Kinetic cross coupling between nonconserved and conserved fields in phase field models

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Brener, Efim A ^a   Boussinot, G ^a,b  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR EISENFORSCHUNG GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION FIELDS; CROSS-COUPLINGS; FREE-BOUNDARY PROBLEMS; IN-PHASE; ISOTHERMAL TRANSFORMATIONS; ONSAGER; PHASE FIELD MODELS; PHASE FIELDS; PHASE-FIELD SIMULATION; SOLUTE TRAPPING; TWO-COMPONENT;

PHASE INTERFACES; TWO PHASE FLOW;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 84871442079     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.060601     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. B. Caroli, C. Caroli, and B. Roulet, Acta Metall. AMETAR 0001-6160 10.1016/0001-6160(86)90131-8 34, 1867 (1986). (Pubitemid 16637045)
2. J. C. Baker and J. W. Cahn, in Solidification (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1971), p. 23.
3. N. Provatas and K. Elder, Phase-Field Methods in Materials Science and Engineering (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2010).
4. I. Steinbach, L. Zhang, and M. Plapp, Acta Mater. ACMAFD 1359-6454 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.035 60, 2689 (2012).
5. Z. Bi and R. F. Sekerka, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/S0378- 4371(98)00364-1 261, 95 (1998).
6. S. R. De Groot and P. Mazur, Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962).
7. E. A. Brener and D. E. Temkin, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.031601 85, 031601 (2012).
8. A. Karma, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115701 87, 115701 (2001).
9. B. Echebarria, R. Folch, A. Karma, and M. Plapp, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.061604 70, 061604 (2004). (Pubitemid 40219639)
10. A. Karma and W. J. Rappel, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.R3017 53, R3017 (1996);
11. A. Karma and W. J. Rappel, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.4323 57, 4323 (1998).
12. K. R. Elder, M. Grant, N. Provatas, and J. M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.021604 64, 021604 (2001).
13. D. E. Temkin, J. Cryst. Growth JCRGAE 0022-0248 10.1016/0022-0248(81) 90209-8 52, 299 (1981).
14. This is the case because we consider a locally flat interface. For a curved interface, the integral which involves the Laplacian of leads to the classical Gibbs-Thomson curvature correction which is proportional to the interface free energy. Moreover we do not discuss surface diffusion and interface stretching (see, for example,) which are generically smaller than interface kinetic effects in the macroscopic limit.
15. R. Folch and M. Plapp, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.72. 011602 72, 011602 (2005). (Pubitemid 41521209)
16. H. Löwen, J. Bechhoefer, and L. S. Tuckerman, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.2399 45, 2399 (1992).
17. A. L. Korzhenevskii, R. Bausch, and R. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.041609 83, 041609 (2011).
18. C. Misbah, O. Pierre-Louis, and Y. Saito, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.981 82, 981 (2010).