Improvements on multiloop control design via net load evaluation

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 50, Issue , 2013, Pages 54-70

  Zumoffen, David ^a,b   Basualdo, Marta ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD TECNOLÓGICA NACIONAL   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Control structure design; Controllability; Disturbance rejection; Plant wide control; Sparse controller

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL CONTROL; CONTROL POLICY; CONTROL STRUCTURE DESIGN; CONTROLLED VARIABLES; CONTROLLER STRUCTURES; IN-PROCESS CONTROL; MULTI VARIABLES; MULTI-LOOP CONTROL; PLANTWIDE CONTROL; ROBUST STABILITY; SELECTION BASED; SUM OF SQUARES;

CONTROLLABILITY; DESIGN; DISTURBANCE REJECTION;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 84871421409     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Assali W., McAvoy T. Optimal selection of dominant measurements and manipulated variables for production control. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2010, 49:7832-7842.
2. Bristol E. On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1966, 11(1):133-134.
3. Buckley P. Techniques of process control 1964, Willey, New York, USA.
4. Castro J., Doyle F. A pulp mill benchmark problem for control: Problem description. Journal of Process Control 2004, 14:17-29.
5. Chang J., Yu C. The relative gain for non-square multivariable systems. Chemical Engineering Science 1990, 45:1309-1323.
6. Chang J., Yu C. Relative disturbance gain array. AIChE Journal 1992, 38:521-534.
7. Chang J., Yu C. Synthesis of controller structures for robust load performance. International Journal of Control 1994, 60:1353-1369.
8. Garcia C., Morari M. Internal model control. 2. Design procedure for multivariable systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 1985, 24:472-484.
9. Golub G., Van Loan C. Matrix computations. 1996, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 3rd ed.
10. Govatsmark M., Skogestad S. Control structure selection for an evaporation process. European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering 2001, 11:657-662.
11. Grosdidier P., Morari M., Holt B. Closed-loop properties from steady-state gain information. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 1985, 24:221-235.
12. He M., Cai W., Ni W., Xie L. RNGA based control system configuration for multivariable processes. Journal of Process Control 2009, 19:1036-1042.
13. Hori E., Skogestad S. Selection of controlled variables: Maximum gain rule and combination of measurements. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2008, 47:9465-9471.
14. Hori E., Skogestad S., Alstad V. Perfect steady-state indirect control. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2005, 44:863-867.
15. Horn R., Johnson C. Matrix analysis 1990, Cambridge University Press.
16. Kariwala V., Cao Y. Bidirectional branch and bound for controlled variable selection. Part III: Local average loss minimization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2010, 6:54-61.
17. Kariwala V., Cao Y. Branch and bound method for multiobjective pairing selection. Automatica 2010, 5:932-936.
18. Khaki-Sedigh A., Moaveni B. Control configuration selection for multivariable plants 2009, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
19. Lin F., Jeng J., Huang H. Multivariable control with generalized decoupling for disturbance rejection. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2009, 48:9175-9185.
20. Ljung L. System identification: Theory for the user 1999, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA. 2nd ed.
21. Luyben W. Simple method for tuning SISO controllers in multivariable systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 1986, 25:654-660.
22. Luyben W., Tyréus B., Luyben M. Plant-wide process control 1998, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
23. Maciejowski J. Predictive control with constraints 2002, Prentice Hall, Harlow, Essex, England.
24. McAvoy T., Arkun Y., Chen R., Robinson D., Schnelle P. A new approach to defining a dynamic relative gain. Control Engineering Practice 2003, 11:907-914.
25. Molina G., Zumoffen D., Basualdo M. A new systematic approach to find plantwide control structures. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 2009, 27:1599-1604.
26. Molina G., Zumoffen D., Basualdo M. Plant-wide control strategy applied to the Tennessee Eastman process at two operating points. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2011, 35:2081-2097.
27. Monica T., Yu C., Luyben W. Improved multiloop single-input/single-output (SISO) controllers for multivariable processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1988, 27:969-973.
28. Shen Y., Cai W., Li S. Multivariable process control: Decentralized, decoupling or sparse?. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2010, 49:761-771.
29. Skogestad S., Postlethwaite I. Multivariable feedback control. Analysis and Design 2005, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
30. Skogetad S., Morari M. Implications of large RGA elements on control performance. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1987, 26:2323-2330.
31. Yuan Z., Chen B., Zhao J. Effect of manipulated variables selection on the controllability of chemical processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2011, 10.1021/ie2001132.
32. Zumoffen D., Basualdo M. Optimal sensor location for chemical process accounting the best control configuration. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 2009, 27:1593-1598.
33. Zumoffen D., Basualdo M. A systematic approach for the design of optimal monitoring systems for large scale processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2010, 49:1749-1761.
34. Zumoffen D., Molina G., Nieto L., Basualdo M. Systematic control approach for the Petlyuk distillation column. 18th IFAC World Congress 2011, 8552-8557.