Following the money': The political economy of gambling research

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 17-18

  Young, Martin ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871416827     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: 14767392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/16066359.2012.719053     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Babor, T.F. (2009). Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: Issues, concerns and conflicts of interest. Addiction, 104, 34-47.
2. Barnes, D.E., & Bero, L.A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1566-1570. (Pubitemid 28233013)
3. Hacking, I. (2006). Making up people. London Review of Books, 28, 23-26.
4. Malone, R., & Bero, L. (2003). Chasing the dollar: Why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 546-548. (Pubitemid 36930272)
5. Miller, P., Carter, A., & de Groot, F. (2012). Investment and vested interests in neuroscience research of addiction: Ethical research requires more than informed consent. In A. Carter, W. Hall, & J. Illes (Eds.), Addiction neuroethics: The ethics of addiction neuroscience research and treatment (pp. 277- 300). London: Elsevier.
6. Shaffer, H.J., & LaPlante, D.A. (2013). Considering a critique of pathological gambling prevalence research. Addiction Research and Theory, 21, 12-14.
7. Volberg, R.A., & Wray, M. (2013). Beyond social control: Prevalence research and the uses of expert knowledge. Addiction Research and Theory, 21, 15-16.
8. Young, M. (2013). Statistics, scapegoats and social control: A critique of pathological gambling prevalence research. Addiction Research and Theory, 21, 1-11.