The Future of Virtual Compound Screening

Chemical Biology and Drug Design

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 33-40

  Heikamp, Kathrin ^a   Bajorath, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active compounds; Biologically relevant chemical space; Computational methods; Genome information; Ligand based virtual screening; Small molecular probes; Structure based virtual screening; Target proteins

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA PROCESSING; FUTUROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VIRTUAL COMPOUND SCREENING;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; LIGANDS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84871390611     PISSN: 17470277     EISSN: 17470285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12054     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Irwin J.J., Sterling T., Mysinger M.M., Bolstad E.S., Coleman R.G. (2012) ZINC - A free tool to discover chemistry for biology. J Chem Inf Model;52:1757-1768.
2. Harrow J., Denoeud F., Frankish A., Reymond A., Chen C.-K., Chrast J., Lagarde J., Gilbert J.G.R., Storey R., Swarbreck D., Rossier C., Ucla C., Hubbard T., Antonarakis S.E., Guigo R. (2006) GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol;7(Suppl. 1):S4.1-S4.9.
3. Bermanm H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res;28:235-242.
4. Ripphausen P., Nisius B., Peltason L., Bajorath J. (2010) Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. J Med Chem;53:8461-8467.
5. Ripphausen P., Nisius B., Bajorath J. (2011) State-of-the-art in ligand-based virtual screening. Drug Discov Today;16:372-376.
6. Stumpfe D., Ripphausen P., Bajorath J. (2012) Virtual compound screening in drug discovery. Future Med Chem;4:593-602.
7. Ripphausen P., Stumpfe D., Bajorath J. (2012) Analysis of structure-based virtual screening studies and characterization of identified active compounds. Future Med Chem;4:603-613.
8. Vogt M., Bajorath J. (2012) Chemoinformatics: a view of the field and current trends in method development. Bioorg Med Chem;20:5317-5323.
9. Taboureau O., Baell J.B., Fernández-Recio J., Villoutreix B.O. (2012) Established and emerging trends in computational drug discovery in the structural genomics era. Chem Biol;19:29-41.
10. Scior T., Bender A., Tresadern G., Medina-Franco J.L., Martínez-Mayorga K., Langer T., Cuanalo-Contreras K., Agrafiotis D.K. (2012) Recognizing pitfalls in virtual screening: a critical review. J Chem Inf Model;52:867-881.
11. Glick M., Jacoby E. (2011) The role of computational methods in the identification of bioactive compounds. Curr Opin Chem Biol;15:540-546.
12. Sukumar N., Das S. (2011) Current trends in virtual high throughput screening using ligand-based and structure-based methods. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen;14:872-888.
13. Schneider G. (2010) Virtual screening: an endless staircase? Nat Rev Drug Discov;9:273-276.
14. Sousa S.F., Cerqueira N.M., Fernandes P.A., Ramos M.J. (2010) Virtual screening in drug design and development. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen;13:442-453.
15. Köppen H. (2009) Virtual screening - what does it give us? Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel;12:397-407.
16. Cerqueira N.M., Sousa S.F., Fernandes P.A., Ramos M.J. (2009) Virtual screening of compound libraries. Methods Mol Biol;572:57-70.
17. Green D.V.S. (2008) Virtual screening of chemical libraries for drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov;3:1011-1026.
18. Liao Q., Wang J., Webster Y., Watson I.A. (2009) GPU accelerated support vector machines for mining high-throughput screening data. J Chem Inf Model;49:2718-2725.
19. Liao Q., Wang J., Watson I.A. (2011) Accelerating two algorithms for large-scale compound selection on GPUs. J Chem Inf Model;51:1017-1024.
20. Ma C., Wang L., Xie X.-Q. (2011) GPU accelerated chemical similarity calculation for compound library comparison. J Chem Inf Model;51:1521-1527.
21. Liu P., Agrafiotis D.K., Rassokhin D.N., Yang E. (2011) Accelerating chemical database searching using graphics processing units. J Chem Inf Model;51:1807-1816.
22. Dean J., Ghemawat S. MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. In: Proceedings of the Sixth conference on Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, December 2004, p. 107-113.
23. Taylor R.C. (2010) An overview of the Hadoop/MapReduce/HBase framework and its current applications in bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics;11(Suppl. 12):S1.
24. Estrada T., Zhang B., Cicotti P., Armen R.S., Taufer M. (2012) A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach. Comput Biol Med;42:758-771.
25. Shaw D.E., Deneroff M.M., Dror R.O., Kuskin J.S., Larson R.H., Salmon J.K., Young C. et al. (2008) Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation. Commun ACM;51:91-97.
26. Blum L.C., Reymond J.-L. (2009) 970 million druglike small molecules for virtual screening in the chemical universe database GDB-13. J Am Chem Soc;131:8732-8733.
27. Swamidass S.J., Baldi P. (2007) Bounds and algorithms for fast exact searches of chemical fingerprints in linear and sublinear time. J Chem Inf Model;47:302-317.
28. Baldi P., Hirschberg D.S., Nasr R.J. (2008) Speeding up chemical database searches using a proximity filter based on the logical exclusive OR. J Chem Inf Model;48:1367-1378.
29. Baldi P., Hirschberg D.S. (2009) An intersection inequality sharper than the Tanimoto triangle inequality for efficiently searching large databases. J Chem Inf Model;49:1866-1870.
30. Nasr R., Hirschberg D.S., Baldi P. (2010) Hashing algorithms and data structures for rapid searches of fingerprint vectors. J Chem Inf Model;50:1358-1368.
31. Kristensen T.G., Nielsen J., Pedersen C.N.S. (2010) A tree-based method for the rapid screening of chemical fingerprints. Algorithms Mol Biol;5:9.
32. Smellie A. (2009) Compressed binary bit trees: a new data structure for accelerating database searching. J Chem Inf Model;49:257-262.
33. Shoichet B.K., Kobilka B.K. (2012) Structure-based drug screening for G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci;33:268-272.
34. Bajorath J. (2002) Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat Rev Drug Discov;1:882-894.
35. Nicholls A. (2008) What do we know and when do we know it? J Comput Aided Mol Des;22:239-255.
36. Bajorath J. (2012) Progress in computational medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem;55:3593-3594.
37. Rohrer S.G., Baumann K. (2009) Maximum unbiased validation (MUV) data sets for virtual screening based on PubChem bioactivity data. J Chem Inf Model;49:169-184.
38. Huang N., Shoichet B.K., Irwin J.J. (2006) Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem;49:6789-6801.
39. Nisius B., Vogt M., Bajorath J. (2009) Development of a fingerprint reduction approach for Bayesian similarity searching based on Kullback-Leibler divergence analysis. J Chem Inf Model;49:1347-1358.
40. Nisius B., Bajorath J. (2009) Molecular fingerprint recombination: generating hybrid fingerprints for similarity searching from different fingerprint types. ChemMedChem;4:1859-1863.
41. Nisius B., Bajorath J. (2010) Reduction and recombination of fingerprints of different design increase compound recall and the structural diversity of hits. Chem Biol Drug Des;75:152-160.
42. Cover T.M., Thomas J.A. (1991) Elements of Information Theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
43. Kullback S. (1997) Information Theory and Statistics. Mineola, MN: Dover Publications; p. 1-11.
44. Vogt M., Bajorath J. (2007) Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints. ChemMedChem;2:1311-1320.
45. Muchmore S.W., Debe D.A., Metz J.T., Brown S.P., Martin Y.C., Hajduk P.J. (2008) Application of belief theory to similarity data fusion for use in analog searching and lead hopping. J Chem Inf Model;48:941-948.
46. Swann S.L., Brown S.P., Muchmore S.W., Patel H., Merta P., Locklear J., Hajduk P.J. (2011) A unified, probabilistic framework for structure- and ligand-based virtual screening. J Med Chem;54:1223-1232.
47. Vogt M., Bajorath J. (2011) Introduction of the conditional correlated Bernoulli model of similarity value distributions and its application to the prospective prediction of fingerprint search performance. J Chem Inf Model;51:2496-2506.
48. Paolini G.V., Shapland R.H.B., van Hoorn W.P., Mason J.S., Hopkins A.L. (2006) Global mapping of pharmacological space. Nat Biotechnol;24:805-815.
49. Geppert H., Vogt M., Bajorath J. (2010) Current trends in ligand-based virtual screening: molecular representations, data mining methods, new application areas, and performance evaluation. J Chem Inf Model;50:205-216.
50. Rognan D. (2007) Chemogenomic approaches to rational drug design. Br J Pharmacol;152:38-52.
51. Jacoby E. (2011) Computational chemogenomics. WIRES Comp Mol Sci;1:57-67.
52. Keiser M.J., Roth B.L., Armbruster B.N., Ernsberger P., Irwin J.J., Shoichet B.K. (2007) Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry. Nat Biotech;25:197-206.
53. Bajorath J. (2008) Computational analysis of ligand relationships within target families. Curr Opin Chem Biol;12:352-358.
54. Young D.W., Bender A., Hoyt J., McWhinnie E., Chirn G.-W., Tao C.Y., Tallarico J.A., Labow M., Jenkins J.L., Mitchison T.J., Feng Y. (2008) Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action. Nat Chem Biol;4:59-68.