Recreational fishing selectively captures individuals with the highest fitness potential

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 51, 2012, Pages 20960-20965

  Sutter, David A H ^a,b,c   Suski, Cory D ^b   Philipp, David P ^b,d   Klefoth, Thomas ^a   Wahl, David H ^b,d   Kersten, Petra ^a   Cooke, Steven J ^e   Arlinghaus, Robert ^a,c  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND INLAND FISHERIES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^e CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Angler; Catchability; Evolutionary change; Recreational fisheries; Reproduction

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; FISH; FISH STOCK; FISHERY; FISHING; LARGEMOUTH BASS; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SPAWNING; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ANIMALS; BASS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOLOGY; FEMALE; FISHERIES; FISHES; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

MICROPTERUS; MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES;

EID: 84871374296     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212536109     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Jørgensen C, et al. (2007) Managing evolving fish stocks. Science 318(5854): 1247-1248.
2. Kuparinen A, Merilä J (2007) Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 22(12):652-659.
3. Heino M, Godø OR (2002) Fisheries-induced selection pressures in the context of sustainable fisheries. Bull Mar Sci 70(2):639- 656.
4. Conover DO, Munch SB, Arnott SA (2009) Reversal of evolutionary downsizing caused by selective harvest of large fish. Proc Biol Sci 276(1664):2015-2020.
5. Enberg K, Jørgensen C, Dunlop ES, Heino M, Dieckmann U (2009) Implications of fisheries-induced evolution for stock rebuilding and recovery. Evol Appl 2(3): 394-414.
6. Dieckmann U, Heino M (2007) Probabilistic maturation reaction norms: Their history, strengths, and limitations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 335:253-269.
7. Matsumura S, Arlinghaus R, Dieckmann U (2011) Assessing evolutionary consequences of size-selective recreational fishing on multiple life-history traits, with an application to northern pike (Esox lucius). Evol Ecol 25(3):711-735.
8. Kuparinen A, Merilä J (2008) The role of fisheries-induced evolution. Science 320 (5872):47-50, author reply 47-50.
9. Andersen KH, Brander K (2009) Expected rate of fisheries-induced evolution is slow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(28):11657-11660.
10. Kinnison MT, et al. (2009) Some cautionary notes on fisheries evolutionary impact assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(41):E115, author reply E116.
11. Ashley MV, et al. (2003) Evolutionarily enlightened management. Biol Conserv 111(2):115-123.
12. Dunlop ES, Heino M, Dieckmann U (2009) Eco-genetic modeling of contemporary lifehistory evolution. Ecol Appl 19(7):1815-1834.
13. Dunlop ES, Shuter BJ, Dieckmann U (2007) Demographic and evolutionary consequences of selective mortality: Predictions from an eco-genetic model for small-mouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 136(3):749-765.
14. Quinn TP, Hendry AP, Buck GB (2001) Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: Interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evol Ecol Res 3(8):917-937.
15. Wilson AJ, Hutchings JA, Ferguson MM (2003) Selective and genetic constraints on the evolution of body size in a stream-dwelling salmonid fish. J Evol Biol 16(4):584- 594.
16. Myers RA, Hoenig JM (1997) Direct estimates of gear selectivity from multiple tagging experiments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54(1):1-9.
17. Uusi-Heikkilä S, Wolter C, Klefoth T, Arlinghaus R (2008) A behavioral perspective on fishing-induced evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 23(8):419-421.
18. Philipp DP, et al. (2009) Selection for vulnerability to angling in largemouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 138(1):189-199.
19. Cooke SJ, Suski CD, Ostrand KG, Wahl DH, Philipp DP (2007) Physiological and behavioral consequences of long-term artificial selection for vulnerability to recreational angling in a teleost fish. Physiol Biochem Zool 80(5):480-490.
20. Redpath TD, Cooke SJ, Arlinghaus R, Wahl DH, Philipp DP (2009) Life-history traits and energetic status in relation to vulnerability to angling in an experimentally selected teleost fish. Evol Appl 2(3):312-323.
21. Redpath TD, et al. (2010) The metabolic and biochemical basis of vulnerability to recreational angling after three generations of angling-induced selection in a teleost fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67(12):1983-1992.
22. US Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation (US Department of the Interior, US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC).
23. Suski CD, Philipp DP (2004) Factors affecting the vulnerability to angling of nesting male largemouth and smallmouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 133(5):1100-1106.
24. Philipp DP, Toline CA, Kubacki MF, Philipp DBF, Phelan FJS (1997) The impact of catch-and- release angling on the reproductive success of smallmouth bass and large-mouth bass. N Am J Fish Manage 17(2):557-567.
25. Steinhart GB, Marschall EA, Stein RA (2004) Round goby predation on smallmouth bass offspring in nests during simulated catch-and-release angling. Trans Am Fish Soc 133(1):121-131.
26. Steinhart GB, Dunlop ES, Ridgway MS, Marshall EA (2008) Should I stay or should I go? Optimal parental care decisions of a nest-guarding fish. Evol Ecol Res 10:351-371.
27. Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: Tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15(10):397-402.
28. Parkos JJ, Wahl DH (2010) Intra- and intersystem variation in largemouth bass recruitment: Reproduction, prey availability, and the timing of year-class establishment. Trans Am Fish Soc 139(5):1372-1385.
29. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
30. Vøllestad LA, Quinn TP (2003) Trade-off between growth rate and aggression in juvenile coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Anim Behav 66(3):561-568.
31. Nannini MA, Wahl DH, Philipp DP, Cooke SJ (2011) The influence of selection for vulnerability to angling on foraging ecology in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. J Fish Biol 79(4):1017-1028.
32. Binder TR, et al. (2012) Largemouth bass selected for differential vulnerability to angling exhibit similar routine locomotory activity in experimental ponds. Trans Am Fish Soc 141(5):1252-1259.
33. Ludsin SA, DeVries DR (1997) First-year recruitment of largemouth bass: The interdependency of early life stages. Ecol Appl 7(3):1024-1038.
34. Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: "The sexy son hypothesis." Am Nat 113(2):201-208.
35. Andersson MB (1994) Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
36. Gwinn DC, Allen MS (2010) Exploring population-level effects of fishery closures during spawning: An example using largemouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 139(2):626-634.
37. Enberg K, Jørgensen C, Mangel M (2010) Fishing-induced evolution and changing reproductive ecology of fish: The evolution of steepness. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67(10):1708-1719.
38. Dorow M, Beardmore B, Haider W, Arlinghaus R (2010) Winners and losers of conservation policies for European eel, Anguilla anguilla: An economic welfare analysis for differently specialised eel anglers. Fish Manag Ecol 17(2):106-125.
39. Benz GW, Jacobs RP (1986) Practical field methods of sexing largemouth bass. Prog Fish-Cult 48(3):221-225.
40. Raffetto NS, Baylis JR, Serns SL (1990) Complete estimates of repreductive success in a closed population of smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) . Ecology 71(4):1523-1535.
41. Landsman SJ, Gingerich AJ, Philipp DP, Suski CD (2011) The effects of temperature change on the hatching success and larval survival of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu. J Fish Biol 78(4):1200-1212.
42. Renshaw MA, Saillant E, Bradfield SC, Gold JR (2006) Microsatellite multiplex panels for genetic studies of three species of marine fishes: red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), and cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Aquaculture 253(1-4):731-735.
43. Colbourne JK, Neff BD, Wright JM, Gross MR (1996) DNA fingerprinting of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) using (GT)n microsatellites and its potential for assessment of mating success. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53(2):342-349.
44. DeWoody JA, Fletcher DE, Wilkins SD, Nelson WS, Avise JC (2000) Genetic monogamy and biparental care in an externally fertilizing fish, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Proc Biol Sci 267(1460):2431- 2437.
45. Phillips JM, Noltie DB, Phillips CL (2005) Development and characterization of microsatellites in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides: Potential use for determining parentage. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/nuccore/75992742. Accessed November 10, 2012.
46. Lutz-Carrillo DJ, Hagen C, Dueck LA, Glenn TC (2008) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for Florida largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides floridanus, and other micropterids. Mol Ecol Resour 8(1):178-184.
47. Holm LE, Loeschcke V, Bendixen C (2001) Elucidation of the molecular basis of a null allele in a rainbow trout microsatellite. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 3(6):555-560.
48. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16(5):1099-1106.
49. Kuehl RO (2000) Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA), 2nd Ed.
50. Littel RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for Mixed Models (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), 2nd Ed.
51. Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70(4):967-971.