Reproductive Images: The Autonomous Cell

Science as Culture

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 475-496

  Lie, Merete ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

assisted reproduction; entification; gender; Human cells; molecularization; scientific imaging

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871356387     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2012.679728     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anker, S. and Nelkin, D. 2003. The Molecular Gaze. Art in the Genetic Age, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
2. Åsberg, C. 2005. Genetiska föreställningar. Mellan genus och gener i populärvitenskapens visuella kulturer [Genetic imaginations. Between gender and genes in the visual cultures of popular science], PhD dissertation, Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, Linköping universitet, Linköping
3. Berg, A-J. and Lie, M. (1995) Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender?, Science, Technology & Human Values, 20(3), pp. 332-351.
4. Berger, J. 1972. Ways of Seeing, London: Penguin.
5. Burri, R. V. and Dumit, J. 2008. "Social studies of scientific imaging and visualization". In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3, Edited by: Hackett et al., E. J. 299-317. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Carsten, J. 2004. After Kinship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cartwright, L. 1995. Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine's Visual Culture, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Cobb, M. 2006. The Egg and Sperm Race. The Seventeenth Century Scientists Who Unravelled the Secrets of Sex, Life and Growth, London: Free Press/Simon Schuster.
9. Dijck, J. van. 2005. The Transparent Body. A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging, Seattle, WA and London: University of Washington Press.
10. Duden, B. 1993. Disembodying Women, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
11. Dumit, J. 2004. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Franklin, S. 2000. "Life itself. Global nature and the genetic imaginary". In Global Nature, Global Culture, Edited by: Franklin, S., Lury, C. and Stacey, J. 188-227. London: Sage.
13. Franklin, S., Lury, C. and Stacey, J. 2000. Global Nature, Global Culture, London: Sage.
14. Ginsburg, F. D. and Rapp, E. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order. The Global Politics of Reproduction, Edited by: Ginsburg, F. D. and Rapp, E. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15. Hall, S. 2007. "Encoding, decoding". In The Cultural Studies Reader, 3, Edited by: During, S. 477-506. London and New York: Routledge.
16. Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. Feminism and Technoscience, New York and London: Routledge.
17. Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
18. Joyce, K. 2005. Appealing images: MRI and the production of authoritative knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 35(3): 437-462. (doi:10.1177/0306312705050180)
19. Keller, E. F. 2000. The Century of the Gene, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
20. Keller, E. F. 2002. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Kemp, M. 2006. Seen/Unseen: Art, Science and Intuition from Leonardo to the Hubble Telescope, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Kvande, L. 2008. Bilete av svangerskap-bilete av foster. Ultralyd-diagnostikk i norsk svangerskapsomsorg 1970-1995 [Pictures of pregnancy-pictures of fetuses. Ultrasound diagnostics in Norwegian prenatal care 1970-1995], PhD dissertation, NTNU, Trondheim
23. Landecker, H. 2007. Culturing Life. How Cells Became Technologies, Cambridge: MA and London: Harvard University Press.
24. Laqueur, T. 1990. Making Sex. Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25. Larsen, T. 2010. "Acts of entification. The emergence of thinghood in social life". In Human Nature as Capacity. Transcending Discourse and Classification, Edited by: Rapport, N. 154-178. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
26. Lie, M. 2002. Science as father? Sex and gender in the age of reproductive technologies. European Journal of Women's Studies, 9: 381-399. (doi:10.1177/13505068020090040201)
27. Lie, M., Ravn, M. N. and Spilker, K. 2011. Reproductive imaginations. Stories of egg and sperm. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19(4): 231-248. (doi:10.1080/08038740.2011.618463)
28. Lock, M. (2003) On making up the good-as-deadin a utilitarian world, in: S. Franklin and M. Lock (Eds) Remaking Life and Death. Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences, pp. 165-192 (Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press/Oxford: James Currey).
29. Lock, M. and Nguyen, V-K. (2010) An Anthropology of Biomedicine (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).
30. Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice, Edited by: Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Martin, E. 1991. The egg and the sperm. How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles. SIGNS, 16(3): 485-501. (doi:10.1086/494680)
32. Martin, E. 1992. "Body narratives: body boundaries". In Cultural Studies, Edited by: Grossberg et al, L. 409-419. London: Routledge.
33. Myers, N. 2008. Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modelling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38: 163-199. (doi:10.1177/0306312707082969)
34. Nelkin, D. and Lindee, S. 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon, Oxford: Freeman.
35. Nilsson, L. 1977. A Child is Born, London: Faber & Faber.
36. Rabinow, R. 1996. Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Rose, N. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Sætnan, A. R., Oudshoorn, N. and Kirejczyk, M. 2000. Bodies of Technology: Women's Involvement with Reproductive Medicine, Edited by: Sætnan, A. R., Oudshoorn, N. and Kirejczyk, M. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
39. Sontag, S. (1990) On photography (New York: Anchor Books).
40. Strathern, M. 1992. After Nature. English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Sturken, M. and Cartwright, L. 2001. Practices of Looking. An Introduction to Visual Culture, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Taylor, J. C. 1997. "Image of contradiction: obstetrical ultrasound in American culture". In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation, Edited by: Franklin, S. and Ragoné, H. 15-45. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43. Thompson, C. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Treichler, P. A., Cartwright, L. and Penley, C. 1998. The Visible Woman. Imaging, Technologies, Gender, and Science, Edited by: Treichler, P. A., Cartwright, L. and Penley, C. New York and London: New York University Press.
45. Waldby, C. 2000. The Visible Human Project: Informatic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine, London: Routledge.
46. Watson, J. D. (1969) The Double Helix (New York: New American Library).
47. Wingate, R. and Kwint, M. 2006. Imaging the brain cells: the neuron in visual culture. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7: 745-752. (doi:10.1038/nrn1973)