Understanding spatial variations in the impact of accessibility on land value using geographically weighted regression

Journal of Transport and Land Use

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 46-59

  Du, Hongbo ^a   Mulley, Corinne ^b  

^a Dongguan Institute of Urban Planning and Construction   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Land value; Land value capture; Public transport

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871332298     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19387849     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.225     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adair, A., S. McGreal, A. Smyth, J. Cooper, and T. Ryley. 2000. House prices and accessibility: The testing of relationships within the Belfast urban area. Housing Studies, 15: 699-716.
2. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principal. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Edited by M. Charlton. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
3. Anselin, L. 1999. Spatial Econometrics. School of Social Sciences, University of Texas, Dallas.
4. Armstrong, R. 1994. Impacts of commuter rail service as reflected in single-family residential property values. Journal of Transportation Research Record, 15: 88-98.
5. Cervero, R. 1998. The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press.
6. Cervero, R. and M. Duncan. 2001. Transit's value-added: effects of light and commuter rail services on commercial land values. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
7. Cervero, R. and M. Duncan. 2002. Land Value Impacts of Rail Transit Services in Los Angeles County. National Association of Realtors, Urban Land Institute.
8. Cervero, R. and M. Duncan. 2002. Land Value Impacts of Rail Transit Services in San Diego County. National Association of Realtors, Urban Land Institute.
9. Cervero, R. and J. Landis. 1993. Assessing the impacts of urban rail transit on local real estate markets using quasi-experimental comparisons. Transportation Research part A: Policy and Practice, 27: 13-22.
10. Chesterton. 2002. Second Property Market Activity Final Report. Jubilee line extension impact study unit, University of Westminster.
11. Debrezion G., E. Pels, and P. Rietveld. 2007. The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: a meta-analysis. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35: 161-180.
12. Des Rosiers, F., M. Theriault, M. Voisin, and J. Dube. 2010. Does an improved urban bus service affect house values? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4 (6): 321-346.
13. Dfe, S. 2004. Performance tables 2003: Key stage 2 test results. Department for Education and Skills.
14. DfT. 2004. Technical guidance on accessibility planning in local transport plans. Guidance on Accessibility Planning in Local Transport Plans. Department for Transport, United Kingdom.
15. Du, H. and C. Mulley. 2007. The short-term land value impacts of urban rail transit: Quantitative evidence from Sunderland, UK. Land Use Policy, 24(1): 223-233.
16. Forrest, D. and J. Glen. 1995. The impact of a light rail system on the structure of house prices. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 30: 15-29.
17. Fotheringham, A.S., C. Brunsdon, and M.E. Charlton. 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Chichester: Wiley.
18. GVA. Grimley. 2004. Developing a methodology to capture land value uplift around transport facilities. Report for the Scottish Executive. ISBN 0-7559-3866-6. URL http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/11/20385/48337 (accessed 21 August 2012)
19. Hack, J. 2002. Regeneration and Spatial Development: a Review of Research and Current Practice. Toronto: IBI Group.
20. Haider, M. and E.J. Miller. 2000. Effects of transportation infrastructure and locational elements on residential real estate values: Application of spatial autoregressive techniques. Transportation Research Record, No. 1722: 1-8.
21. Hall, P. and C. Hass-Klau. 1985. Can Rail Save the City?-The Impacts of Rail Rapid Transit and Pedestrianisation on British and German Cities. Gower Publishing Company Ltd.
22. Handy, S.L. and D.A. Niemeier. 1997. Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29: 1175-1194.
23. Hess, B.D. and T.M. Almeida. 2007. Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York. Urban Studies, 44: 1041-1067.
24. Hass-Klau, C., G. Crampton, and R. Benjari. 2004. Economic Impact of Light Rail: The Results of 15 Urban Areas in France, Germany, UK and North America. Environmental and Transport Planning, England.
25. Henneberry, J. 1998. Transport investment and house prices. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 16: 144-158.
26. Horner, M.W. and J.N. Mefford. 2005. GIS-based strategies for measuring worker accessibility to job opportunities: The case of bus transit. Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
27. Hometrack. 2005. Annual house price survey (UK). URL www.hometrack.co.uk.
28. Knight, R.L. 1980. The impact of rail transit on land use: Evidence and a change of perspective. Transportation, 9: 3-16.
29. Laakso, S. 1992. Public transport investment and residential property values in Helsinki. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 9: 217-229.
30. Landis, J., S. Guhathakurta, and M. Zhang. 1994. Capitalization of Transit Investments into Single-Family Home Prices. The University of California Transportation Center.
31. Lawless, P. and G. Dabinett. 1995. Urban regeneration and transport investment-A research agenda. Environment and Planning A, 27: 1029-1048.
32. Leung, Y., C.L. Mei, and W.X. Zhang. 2000. Statistical tests for spatial nonstationarity based on the geographically weighted regression model. Environment and Planning A, 32: 9-32.
33. Ma, K-R. and D. Banister. 2006. Extended excess commuting: a measure of the jobs-housing imbalance in Seoul. Urban Studies, 43 (11): 2099-2113.
34. McMillen, D. and J. McDonald. 2004. Reaction of house prices to a new rapid transit line: Chicago. Real Estate Economics, 32 (3): 463-6.
35. Morris, J.M., P. Dumble, and M. Wigan.1979. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A, 13 (2): 91-109.
36. Munoz-Raskin, R. 2009. Walking accessibility to bus rapid transit: Does it affect property values? The case of Bogota, Colombia. Transport Policy, 17 (2): 72-84.
37. Pasha, H.A. 1995. Comparative statics analysis of urban land values in the presence of government regulation. Urban Studies, 32: 1505-1516.
38. Pickett, M.W. and K. Perrett. 1984. The effect of the Tyne and wear metro on residential property values. SR 825, TRRL 29.
39. RICS. 2002. Land value and public transport stage 1-Summary of findings. RICS Policy Unit, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors. www.rics.org.
40. RICS. 2004. Land value and public transport stage 2-Summary of findings. RICS Policy Unit, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors. www.rics.org.
41. Riley, D. 2001. Taken for a Ride. The Center for Land Policy Studies, London.
42. Rodriguez, D. and F. Targa. 2004.Value of accessibility to Bogota's Bus Rapid Transit System. Transport Reviews 24 (5): 586-610.
43. Smith, J. and T. Gihring, 2006. Financing transit systems through value capture: An annotated bibliography. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 65 (3): 751-786. Updated as Smith and Gihring with Litman. 2009.
44. Smith, J., T. Gihring, with T. Litman. 2009. Financing Transit Systems through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. www.vtpi.org.
45. So, H.M, R. Tse, and S. Ganesan. 1997. Estimating the influence of transport on house prices: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 15: 40-47.
46. Thomas, M. and G. Copley. 2002. Croydon tramlink impact study-Summary report. DfT.
47. Tobler, W. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46: 234-240.
48. TRRL.1984. The impact of metro and public transport integration in Tyne and Wear. Metro Monitoring and Development Study. SR 478, TRRL.
49. TRRL.1993.The longer term effects of the Tyne and wear Metro. CR 357, TRRL.
50. TWWP. 2005. Local transport plan-Tyne and Wear 2006- 2011. Tyne and Wear Plan Partners.
51. Weinberger, R. 2001. Light rail proximity: Benefit or detriment?-The case of Santa Clara County, California. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
52. Wheeler, D. and M. Tiefelsdorf. 2005. Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographic Systems, 7: 161-187
53. Zhu, X. and S. Liu. 2004. Analysis of the impact of the MRT system on accessibility in Singapore using an integrated GIS tool. Journal of Transport Geography, 12: 89-101.
54. Zondag, B. and M. Pieters. 2005. Influence of accessibility on residential location choice. 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.