Hierarchical object-based classification of dense urban areas by integrating high spatial resolution satellite images and LiDAR elevation data

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 38, Issue 4C7, 2010, Pages

  Dinis, J ^a   Navarro, A ^a   Soares, F ^a   Santos, T ^b   Freire, S ^b   Fonseca, A ^c   Afonso, N ^c   Tenedorio J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING   (Portugal)

Author keywords

LiDAR data; Object oriented classification; QuickBird; Shadows classification; Urban areas

Indexed keywords

IMAGE RESOLUTION; OBJECT DETECTION; OPTICAL RADAR; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SATELLITES; TREES (MATHEMATICS); VEGETATION;

HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGERY; HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGERY; LIDAR DATA; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING; NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX; OBJECT ORIENTED CLASSIFICATION; QUICKBIRD; URBAN AREAS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84871326548     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Alexander, C., Smith-Voysey, S., Jarvis, C., Tansey, K., 2009. Integrating building footprints and LiDAR elevation data to classify roof structures and visualize buildings. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(4), pp. 285-292.
2. Benz, U. C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., Heynen, M., 2004. Multiresolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 58, pp. 239-258.
3. Chen, Y., Su, W., Li, J., Sun, Z., 2009. Hierarchical object oriented classification using very high resolution imagery and LIDAR data over urban areas. Advances in Space Research, 43, pp. 1101-1110.
4. Congalton, R.G., 1988. A comparison of sampling schemes used in generating error matrices for assessing the accuracy of maps generated from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(5), pp. 593-600.
5. Congalton, R. G., Green, K., 2009. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC Press, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL.
6. Definiens (2006). Definiens Professional 5 Reference Book, Definiens AG. http:// www.definiens.com (accessed Sep. 2009).
7. Dou, W., Chen, Y. H., 2005. Report of Urban Planning Module in MACRES Airborne Remote Sensing Programme. Malaysian Center for Remote Sensing (MACRES), Malaysia, 2005.
8. Gamanya, R., De Maeyer, P., De Dapper, M., 2007. An automated satellite image classification design using objectoriented segmentation algorithms: A move towards standardization. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), pp. 616-624.
9. Gamba, P., Houshmand, B., 2002. Joint analysis of SAR, LIDAR and aerial imagery over an urban environment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(20), pp. 4439-4450.
10. Holland, D.A., Boyd, D.S., Marshall, P., 2006. Updating topographic mapping in Great Britain using imagery from highresolution satellite sensors. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 60, pp. 212-223.
11. Madhok, V., Landgrebe, D., 1999. Supplementing hyperspectral data with digital elevation. In: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS-99), Hamburg, Germany, June 1999, vol. I, pp. 59-61.
12. Navulur, K. (2007). Multispectral image analysis using the object-oriented paradigm. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
13. Priestnall, G., Glover, R., 1998. A control strategy for automated land use change detection: an integration of vectorbased GIS, remote sensing and pattern recognition. Carver, S. Editor, Innovations in GIS 5 Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 162-175.
14. Schiewe, J., 2002. Segmentation of high-resolution remotely sensed data concepts, applications and problems. In: Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications.
15. Shackelford, A. K., Davis, C.H., 2003. A combined fuzzy pixelbased and object-based approach for classification of highresolution multispectral data over urban areas. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions, 41(10), pp. 2354-2363.
16. Sohn, G., Dowman, I., 2007. Data fusion of high-resolution satellite imagery and LiDAR data for automatic building extraction. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62, pp. 43-63.
17. Stehman, S.V., 1999. Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, pp. 2423-2441.
18. Stehman, S.V., Czaplewski, R.L., 2003. Introduction to special issue on map accuracy. Environmental and Ecology Statistics, 10, pp. 301-308.
19. Van der Sande, C.J., de Jong, S.M., de Roo, A.P.J., 2003. A segmentation and classification approach of IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4, pp. 217-229.
20. Vu, T.T., Matsuoka, M., Yamazaki, F., 2004. LIDAR-based change detection of buildings in dense urban areas. In: Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE, CD-ROM, 4pp.
21. Yuan, F., Bauer, M.E., 2006. Mapping impervious surface area using high resolution imagery: a comparison of object-oriented classification to per-pixel classification. In: Proceedings of American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference, May 1-5, 2006, Reno, NV, CD-ROM.
22. Zhou,W., Troy, A., 2008. An object-oriented approach for analyzing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(11), pp.3119-3135.
23. Zhou, W., Huang, G., Troy, A., Cadenasso, M.L., 2009. Objectbased land cover classification of shaded areas in high spatial resolution imagery of urban areas: A comparison study. Journal of Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, pp. 1769-1777.