Developing a new hybrid revascularization program: A road map for hospital managers and physician leaders

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 557-564

  Harjai, Kishore J ^a   Samy, Sanjay ^a   Pennypacker, Barbara ^a   Onofre, Bonnie ^a   Stanfield, Pamela ^a   Yaeger, Lynne ^a   Stapleton, Dwight ^a   Esrig, Barry C ^a  

^a GUTHRIE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOPIDOGREL; HEPARIN; HIRULOG;

ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DRUG ELUTING STENT; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; HYBRID CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; LOADING DRUG DOSE; MANAGER; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; RETRACTOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; HUMANS; MAMMARY ARTERIES; OPERATING ROOMS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;

EID: 84871322760     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00756.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al,. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-972.
2. de CD, Jansens JL, Goldschmidt-Clermont P, et al,. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on pump" double bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 563-570.
3. Isomura T, Suma H, Horii T, et al,. Minimally invasive coronary artery revascularization: Off-pump bypass grafting and the hybrid procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 2017-2022.
4. Wittwer T, Cremer J, Boonstra P, et al,. Myocardial "hybrid" revascularization with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with coronary angioplasty: Preliminary results of a multicentre study. Heart 2000; 83: 58-63.
5. Davidavicius G, Van PF, Mansour S, et al,. Hybrid revascularization strategy: A pilot study on the association of robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fractional-flow-reserve- guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2005; 112: I317-I322.
6. Delhaye C, Sudre A, Lemesle G, et al,. Hybrid revascularization, comprising coronary artery bypass graft with exclusive arterial conduits followed by early drug-eluting stent implantation, in multivessel coronary artery disease. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2010; 103: 502-511.
7. Gao C, Yang M, Wu Y, et al,. Hybrid coronary revascularization by endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting on beating heart and stent placement. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 737-741.
8. Hu S, Li Q, Gao P, et al,. Simultaneous hybrid revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 432-438.
9. Kon ZN, Brown EN, Tran R, et al,. Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization reduces postoperative morbidity compared with results from conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 367-375.
10. Lee MS, Wilentz JR, Makkar RR, et al,. Hybrid revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention and robotically assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 419-425.
11. Zhao DX, Leacche M, Balaguer JM, et al,. Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization results from a fully integrated hybrid catheterization laboratory/operating room. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 232-241.
12. Subramanian VA, Sani G, Benetti FJ, et al,. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: A multi-center report of preliminary clinical experience. Circulation 1995; 92 (Suppl 8): 1-645.
13. Harjai KJ, Orshaw P, Shenoy C, et al,. Clinical outcomes following drug-eluting versus bare metal stent implantation for lesion subsets excluded from pivotal clinical trials: Findings from the GHOST Study (Guthrie Health System Off-Label StenT Study). J Interv Cardiol 2008; 21 (4): 315-324.
14. Harjai KJ, Orshaw P, Boura J, et al,. Comparison of long-term outcomes of bare metal or drug-eluting stent implantation in standard versus off-label coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103 (11): 1537-1545.
15. Douville EC, Handy JR Jr, Tsen AC, et al,. MIDCAB: Impact of epicardial stabilization upon outcomes. Heart Surg Forum 1999; 2 (1): 41-46.
16. Kiaii B, McClure RS, Stewart P, et al,. Simultaneous integrated coronary artery revascularization with long-term angiographic follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136 (3): 702-708.
17. Fernandez A, Aboodi MS, Milewski K, et al,. Comparison of adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding complications of loading dose of clopidogrel 300 mg versus 600 mg in stable patients undergoing elective percutaneous intervention (from the CADICE study). Am J Cardiol 2011; 107 (1): 6-9.
18. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al,. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493-1501.
19. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al,. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1597-607.
20. Ferguson TB Jr, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, et al,. A decade of change-risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: A report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 480-489.
21. Maganti M, Brister SJ, Yau TM, et al,. Changing trends in emergency coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142 (4): 816-822.