The one-to-one principle: Challenges in current practice

Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 150-164

  Miller, Steven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

1:1 principle; Content versus carrier; CONTENTdm; Dublin Core; Manifestations; Metadata; Multiple versions; One to one principle

Indexed keywords

1:1 PRINCIPLE; CONTENT VERSUS CARRIER; CONTENTDM; DUBLIN CORE; MANIFESTATIONS; MULTIPLE VERSIONS; ONE-TO-ONE PRINCIPLE;

PHOTOGRAPHY;

METADATA;

EID: 84871301351     PISSN: 19391358     EISSN: 19391366     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. CDP (2006). CDP Metadata Working Group. Dublin Core metadata best practices, Version 2.1.1, September 2006. Retrieved April 12, 2010. http://www.bcr.org/dps/cdp/best/dublin-core-bp.pdf.
2. Chapman, John (2010). Promoting shareable metadata. Retrieved April 24, 2010. http://community.oclc.org/metalogue/archives/2010/04/promoting-shareable- metadata.html.
3. DCMI metadata basics. Retrieved July 15, 2010. http://dublincore.org/ metadata-basics/.
4. Dekkers, Max (2010). Dublin Core Metadata Initiative-Status report March 2010. Retrieved July 2, 2010. http://dublincore.org/news/communications/ statusreports/2010/03/
5. DLF Aquifer. Retrieved April 14, 2010. http://www.diglib.org/aquifer/ index.htm.
6. FRBR (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records, Final report / IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. München : K.G. Saur. Current text available at http://www.ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic- records
7. Han, Myung-Ja, Christine Cho, Timothy W. Cole, Amy S. Jackson (2009). Metadata for special collections in CONTENTdm: How to improve interoperability of unique fields through OAI-PMH. Journal of Library Metadata, 9(3-4), 213-238.
8. Hillmann, Diane (2005). Using Dublin Core. Retrieved March 15, 2010. http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/.
9. Hutt, Arwen, and Jenn Riley (2005). Semantics and syntax of Dublin Core usage in Open Archives Initiative data providers of cultural heritage materials. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Denver, CO, June 7-11, 2005, 262-270. New York: ACM Press.
10. Nilsson, Mikael, Thomas Baker, Pete Johnston (2008). The Singapore Framework for Dublin Core Application Profiles. Retrieved July 15,2010. http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/01/14/singapore-framework/
11. Powell, Andy, Mikael Nilsson, Ambjörn Naeve, Pete Johnston, Thomas Baker (2007). DCMI Abstract Model. Retrieved April 12, 2010. http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/.
12. Riley, Jenn, John Chapman, Sarah Shreeves, Laura Akerman, and William Landis (2008). Promoting shareability: Metadata activities of the DLF Aquifer Initiative. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(3), 221-248.
13. VRA 3.0 Introduction. Retrieved April 12, 2010. http://www.vraweb.org/ projects/vracore3/index.html.
14. VRA 4.0 Examples. Retrieved April 7,2010. http://www.archivision.com/ outgoing/vracore4/examplescat04.html.
15. VRA 4.0 Introduction. Retrieved April 12, 2010. http://www.vraweb.org/ projects/vracore4/VRA-Core4-Intro.pdf.
16. Woodley, Mary (2005). DCMI glossary. Retrieved March 15, 2010. http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/glossary.shtml.