-
1
-
-
43049113533
-
GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, G.E. Vist, R. Kunz, Y. Falck-Ytter, and P. Alonso-Coello GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 336 2008 924 926
-
(2008)
BMJ
, vol.336
, pp. 924-926
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Vist, G.E.3
Kunz, R.4
Falck-Ytter, Y.5
Alonso-Coello, P.6
-
2
-
-
79951944676
-
GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, H.J. Schünemann, P. Tugwell, and A. Knotterus GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 380 382
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 380-382
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Schünemann, H.J.3
Tugwell, P.4
Knotterus, A.5
-
3
-
-
79951952372
-
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
-
G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, E.A. Akl, R. Kunz, G. Vist, and J. Brozek GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 383 394
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 383-394
-
-
Guyatt, G.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Akl, E.A.3
Kunz, R.4
Vist, G.5
Brozek, J.6
-
4
-
-
79951951792
-
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz, D. Atkins, J. Brozek, and G. Vist GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 395 400
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 395-400
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Kunz, R.3
Atkins, D.4
Brozek, J.5
Vist, G.6
-
5
-
-
79951955198
-
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of the evidence
-
H. Balshem, M. Helfand, H.J. Schünemann, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz, and J. Brozek GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of the evidence J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 401 406
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 401-406
-
-
Balshem, H.1
Helfand, M.2
Schünemann, H.J.3
Oxman, A.D.4
Kunz, R.5
Brozek, J.6
-
6
-
-
79951955368
-
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence - Study limitations (risk of bias)
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, G. Vist, R. Kunz, J. Brozek, and P. Alonso-Coello GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence - study limitations (risk of bias) J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 407 415
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 407-415
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Vist, G.3
Kunz, R.4
Brozek, J.5
Alonso-Coello, P.6
-
7
-
-
84863034391
-
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence - Publication bias
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, V. Montori, G. Vist, R. Kunz, and J. Brozek GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence - publication bias J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1277 1282
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 1277-1282
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Montori, V.3
Vist, G.4
Kunz, R.5
Brozek, J.6
-
8
-
-
80054997769
-
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence - Imprecision
-
G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz, J. Brozek, P. Alonso-Coello, and D. Rind GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence - imprecision J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1283 1293
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 1283-1293
-
-
Guyatt, G.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Kunz, R.3
Brozek, J.4
Alonso-Coello, P.5
Rind, D.6
-
9
-
-
80054981259
-
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - Inconsistency
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxmand, R. Kunz, J. Woodcock, J. Brozek, and M. Helfand GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1294 1302
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 1294-1302
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxmand, A.D.2
Kunz, R.3
Woodcock, J.4
Brozek, J.5
Helfand, M.6
-
10
-
-
80054972197
-
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - Indirectness
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz, J. Woodcock, J. Brozek, and M. Helfamd GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1303 1310
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 1303-1310
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Kunz, R.3
Woodcock, J.4
Brozek, J.5
Helfamd, M.6
-
11
-
-
80055023010
-
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, S. Sultan, P. Glasziou, E.A. Akl, and P. Alonso-Coello GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1311 1316
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 1311-1316
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Sultan, S.3
Glasziou, P.4
Akl, E.A.5
Alonso-Coello, P.6
-
12
-
-
85054107948
-
Attitudes of guideline development groups to the use of GRADE in evidence evaluation and development of recommendations
-
Chicago, IL
-
Thornton J, Siddiqui F, Nyong J, Kelly V, Tan TPY, Sharma T, et al. Attitudes of guideline development groups to the use of GRADE in evidence evaluation and development of recommendations. Guideline International Annual Conference; 2010; Chicago, IL.
-
(2010)
Guideline International Annual Conference
-
-
Thornton, J.1
Siddiqui, F.2
Nyong, J.3
Kelly, V.4
Tan, T.P.Y.5
Sharma, T.6
-
13
-
-
71749104066
-
The tyranny of power: Is there a better way to calculate sample size?
-
J.M. Bland The tyranny of power: is there a better way to calculate sample size? BMJ 339 2009 1133 1135
-
(2009)
BMJ
, vol.339
, pp. 1133-1135
-
-
Bland, J.M.1
-
14
-
-
79954510437
-
Chapter 10: Grading economic evidence
-
I. Shemilt, M. Mugford, L. Vale, K. Marsh, C. Donaldson, Wiley-Blackwell Oxford, UK
-
M. Brunetti, F. Ruiz, J. Lord, S. Pregno, and A.D. Oxman Chapter 10: Grading economic evidence I. Shemilt, M. Mugford, L. Vale, K. Marsh, C. Donaldson, Evidence-based decisions and economics: health care, social welfare, education and criminal justice 2010 Wiley-Blackwell Oxford, UK 114 133
-
(2010)
Evidence-based Decisions and Economics: Health Care, Social Welfare, Education and Criminal Justice
, pp. 114-133
-
-
Brunetti, M.1
Ruiz, F.2
Lord, J.3
Pregno, S.4
Oxman, A.D.5
-
15
-
-
85054115876
-
Incorporating cost effectiveness into guidelines using GRADE-like evidence profiles
-
S. Reken, and F. Ruiz Incorporating cost effectiveness into guidelines using GRADE-like evidence profiles Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143 1 suppl 2010 44 45
-
(2010)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
, vol.143
, Issue.1 SUPPL.
, pp. 44-45
-
-
Reken, S.1
Ruiz, F.2
-
17
-
-
85054114559
-
Validation of a reporting guideline for mixed treatment comparisons
-
S. Reken, D. Wonderling, and P. Alderson Validation of a reporting guideline for mixed treatment comparisons Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143 1 suppl 2010 16 17
-
(2010)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
, vol.143
, Issue.1 SUPPL.
, pp. 16-17
-
-
Reken, S.1
Wonderling, D.2
Alderson, P.3
-
18
-
-
43749120754
-
GRADE: Going from evidence to recommendations
-
G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz, Y. Falck-Ytter, G.E. Vist, and A. Liberati GRADE: going from evidence to recommendations BMJ 336 2008 1049 1051
-
(2008)
BMJ
, vol.336
, pp. 1049-1051
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Kunz, R.3
Falck-Ytter, Y.4
Vist, G.E.5
Liberati, A.6
-
19
-
-
35848930992
-
Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: A randomized trial
-
E.A. Akl, N. Maroun, G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, P. Alonso-Coello, and G.E. Vist Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial J Clin Epidemiol 60 2007 1298 1305
-
(2007)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.60
, pp. 1298-1305
-
-
Akl, E.A.1
Maroun, N.2
Guyatt, G.3
Oxman, A.D.4
Alonso-Coello, P.5
Vist, G.E.6
-
20
-
-
0142025355
-
Letters, numbers, symbols and words: How to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations
-
GRADE Working Group
-
H.J. Schunemann, D. Best, G. Vist, A.D. Oxman GRADE Working Group Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations CMAJ 169 2003 677 680
-
(2003)
CMAJ
, vol.169
, pp. 677-680
-
-
Schunemann, H.J.1
Best, D.2
Vist, G.3
Oxman, A.D.4
|