Barriers and opportunities for integrating social science into natural resource management: Lessons from national estuarine research reserves

Environmental Management

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 998-1011

  Robinson, Patrick ^a   Genskow, Ken ^a   Shaw, Bret ^a   Shepard, Robin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Human dimensions; Interdisciplinary; Natural resource management; Social Science

Indexed keywords

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS; CASE STUDY RESEARCH; CRITICAL FACTORS; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY APPROACHES; HUMAN DIMENSIONS; INTERDISCIPLINARY; MANAGEMENT ISSUES; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RESERVE SYSTEM; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR;

ESTUARIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESEARCH WORK; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CASE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ESTUARY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BELIEF; SOCIOLOGY; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 84871296195     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9930-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179-211
2. Ajzen I (2002) Residual effects of past on later behavior: habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6:107-122
3. Ajzen I (2006) Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb. measurement.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2009
4. Anderson LG, Bishop R, Davidson M, Hanna S, Holliday M, Kildow J, and others (2003) Social science research within NOAA: review and recommendations. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring
5. Boldero J (1995) The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: the role of attitudes, intentions, and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25:440-462
6. Cheung SF, Chan DK-S, Wong ZS-Y (1999) Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environment and Behavior 31:587-612
7. Conner M, Armitage CJ (1998) Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28:1429-1464
8. Corbert JB (2002) Motivations to participate in riparian improvement programs: applying the theory of planned behavior. Science Communication 23:243-263
9. Decker DJ, Brown TL, Connelly NA, Enck JW, Pomerantz GA, Purdy KG, Siemer WF (1992) Toward a comprehensive paradigm of wildlife management: Integrating the human and biological dimensions. In: Mangun WR (ed) American fish and wildlife policy: the human dimension. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp 33-54
10. DeMaio TJ, Rothgeb J, Hess J (1998) Improving survey quality through pretesting. Proceedings of the survey research methods section. American Statistical Association, Alexandria
11. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
12. Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M (1998) A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 8:891-904
13. Ewel KC (2001) Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems 4:716-722
14. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, and others (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behavior: a manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research, Newcastle upon Tyne
15. Fulton DC, Nelson KC, Anderson DH, Lime DW (eds) (2000) Priority issues and future directions in human dimensions research. In: Human dimensions of natural resource management: emerging issues and practical applications. Cooperative Park Studies Program, University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources, pp 1-8
16. Gardner GT, Stern PC (2002) Environmental problems and human behavior, 2nd edn. Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston
17. Global Evaluation and Applied Research Solutions Inc (2009) NOAA Coastal Services Center and NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System Coastal Training Program joint external review of training activities: findings and improvement options. Author, Decatur
18. Hiwasaki L, Arico S (2007) Integrating the social sciences into ecohydrology: facilitating an interdisciplinary approach to solve issues surrounding water, environment, and people. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 17:3-9
19. Hsiu-Fang H, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15:1277-1288
20. Janesick VJ (1998) The dance of qualitative research design: metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 35-55
21. Mangel M, Talbot LM, Meffe GK, Tundi Agardy M, Averson DL, Barlow J, and others (1996) Principles for the conservation of wild living resources. Ecological Applications 6:338-362
22. McDermaid KK, Barnstable DC (2001) Step-by-step guide to conducting a social profile for watershed planning. University of Illinois, Urbana
23. Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1992) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
24. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2005) Social science plan, vol 1. National Ocean Service. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
25. Nowak P, Cabot P (2004) The human dimension of resourcemanagement programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59: 128A-135A
26. Nowak P, Korsching P (1998) The human dimension of soil and water conservation: a historical and methodological perspective. In: Pierce FJ, Frye WW (eds) Advances in soil and water conservation. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, pp 159-184
27. Nowak P, Bowen S, Cabot P (2006) Disproportionality as a framework for linking social and biophysical systems. Society and Natural Resources 19:153-173
28. Ocean Studies Board and National Research Council (1995) Science, policy, and the coast: improving decision making. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
29. Ouellette JA, Wood W (1998) Habitat and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin 124:54-74
30. Pasquini L, Twyman C, Wainwright J (2010) Toward a conceptual framework for blending social and biophysical attributes in conservation planning: a case-study of privately-conserved lands. Environmental Management 46:659-670
31. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
32. Perry JA, Perry EK (1988) Contemporary society: an introduction to social science, 5th edn. Harper & Row Publishers, New York
33. Poliakoff E, Webb TL (2007) What factors predict scientists' intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication 29:242-263
34. Richmond RH, Rongo T, Golbuu Y, Victor S, Idechong N, Davis G, Kostka W, Neth L, Hamnett M, Wolanski E (2007) Watersheds and coral reefs: conservation science, policy, and implementation. BioScience 57:598-607
35. Riley C (2005) National estuarine research reserve system strategic plan, 2005-2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Estuarine Reserves Division, Silver Spring
36. Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edn. The Free Press, New York
37. Scheffer M, Westley F, Brock WA, Holmgren M (2002) Dynamic interaction of societies and ecosystems-linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 195-239
38. Seidman IE (1991) Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press, New York
39. Sinclair J, Mazzotti F, Graham J (2003) Motives to seek threatened and endangered species information for land-use decisions. Science Communication 25:39-55
40. Singleton RA, Straits BC (2001) Survey interviewing. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA (eds) Handbook of interview research. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 59-82
41. Snow DA, Anderson L (1991) Researching the homeless: the characteristic features and virtues of the case study. In: Feagan JR, Orum AM, Sjoberg G (eds) A case for the case study. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, pp 148-173
42. Society for Conservation Biology (2009) Catalog of conservation social science tools. http://www.conbio.org/workinggroups/sswg/catalog/. Accessed 11 Jan 2011
43. Tellis W (1997) Application of a case study methodology. The qualitative report 3. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-3/tellis2. html. Accessed 25 Feb 2008
44. United States Department of Agriculture (2010) People and their environments. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/units/socialscience/. Accessed 11 Jan 2011
45. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2008) Social science research. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/es/science/social/. Accessed 11 Jan 2011
46. Yin R (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oak