How do developers use parallel libraries?

Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, FSE 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Okur, Semih ^a   Dig, Danny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

C ; empirical study; multi core; parallel libraries

Indexed keywords

C; DIFFERENT SIZES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HARD PROBLEMS; LARGE SCALE EXPERIMENTS; LINES OF CODE; MICROSOFT; MULTI CORE; OPEN-SOURCE; PARALLEL CODE; PARALLEL LANGUAGES; PARALLEL LIBRARY; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; STATE OF THE PRACTICE; TASK PARALLEL;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

PARALLEL PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84871292962     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2393596.2393660     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. O. Callaú, R. Robbes, É. Tanter, and D. Röthlisberger. How developers use the dynamic features of programming languages: the case of smalltalk. In MSR '11: Proceedings of the 8th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pages 23-32, 2011.
2. C. Campbell, R. Johnson, A. Miller, and S. Toub. Parallel Programming with Microsoft .NET: Design Patterns for Decomposition and Coordination on Multicore Architectures. Microsoft Press, 2010.
3. Collections.Concurrent (CC). July'12, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ library/dd997305.aspx/.
4. CodePlex. July'12, http://codeplex.com.
5. T. Dey, Wei Wang, J.W. Davidson, and M.L. Soffa. Characterizing multi-threaded applications based on shared-resource contention. In Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 76-86, 2011.
6. D. Dig. A refactoring approach to parallelism. Software, IEEE, 28(1):17-22, 2011.
7. D. Dig, J. Marrero, and M. D. Ernst. How do programs become more concurrent? a story of program transformations. In IWMSE '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Multicore Software Engineering, pages 43-50, 2011.
8. Github. July'12, https://github.com.
9. M. Gladwell. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Back Bay Books, 2002.
10. B. Goetz, T. Peierls, J. Bloch, J. Bowbeer, D. Holmes, and D. Lea. Java Concurrency in Practice. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2006.
11. M. Grechanik, C. McMillan, L. DeFerrari, M. Comi, S. Crespi, D. Poshyvanyk, C. Fu, Q. Xie, and C. Ghezzi. An empirical investigation into a large-scale java open source code repository. In ESEM '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pages 1-10, 2010.
12. L. Hochstein, F. Shull, and L. B. Reid. The role of mpi in development time: a case study. In SC Conference, pages 1-10, 2008.
13. S. Karus and H. Gall. A study of language usage evolution in open source software. In MSR '11: Proceedings of the 8th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pages 13-22, 2011.
14. D. Lea. Concurrent Programming in Java l: Design Principles and Pattern. Prentice Hall, 1999.
15. D. Leijen, W. Schulte, and S. Burckhardt. The design of a task parallel library. ACM SIGPLAN Not., 44(10):227-242, 2009.
16. B. P. Lester. The Art of Parallel Programming. 1st World Publishing, Inc., 2006.
17. T. G. Mattson, B. A. Sanders, and B. L. Massingill. Patterns for Parallel Programming. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2005.
18. M. Monperrus, M. Eichberg, E. Tekes, and M. Mezini. What should developers be aware of? an empirical study on the directives of api documentation. Empirical Software Engineering, Online Edition, 2011.
19. Survival of the Forgest. July'12, http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2011/06/02/ blackduck-webinar/.
20. V. Pankratius. Automated usability evaluation of parallel programming constructs. In ICSE '11 (NIER track): Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 936-939, 2011.
21. V. Pankratius, C. Schaefer, A. Jannesari, and W. F. Tichy. Software engineering for multicore systems: an experience report. In IWMSE '08: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Multicore software engineering, pages 53-60, 2008.
22. C. Parnin, C. Bird, and E. Murphy-Hill. Java generics adoption: how new features are introduced, championed, or ignored. In MSR '11: Proceedings of the 8th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pages 3-12, 2011.
23. Parallel Language Integrated Query (PLINQ). July'12, http://msdn. microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd460688.aspx/.
24. AppVisum Project. July'12, https://github.com/Alxandr/AppVisum.Sys.
25. Backgrounded Project. July'12, http://www.github.com/swedishkid/ backgrounded.
26. DotNetWebToolkit Project. July'12 https://github.com/chrisdunelm/ DotNetWebToolkit.
27. Gpxviewer Project. July'12, https://github.com/andrewgee/gpxviewer.
28. PasswordGenerator Project. July'12, https://github.com/PanosSakkos/ PasswordGenerator.
29. Profit Project. July'12, http://profit.codeplex.com/.
30. Ravendb Project. July'12, https://github.com/ravendb/ravendb.
31. The Roslyn Project. July'12, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/hh500769.
32. Martin P. Robillard and Robert Deline. A field study of api learning obstacles. Empirical Software Engineering, 16(6):703-732, 2011.
33. System.Threading. July'12, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ system.threading.
34. Threading Building Block (TBB). July'12, http://threadingbuildingblocks. org/.
35. W. Torres, G. Pinto, B. Fernandes, J. P. Oliveira, F. A. Ximenes, and F. Castor. Are java programmers transitioning to multicore?: a large scale study of java oss. In SPLASH '11 Workshops, pages 123-128, 2011.
36. Companion TPL usage data. July'12, http://learnparallelism.net.
37. ForkJoinTask Doug Lea's Workstation. July'12, http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/ dl/jsr166/dist/ jsr166ydocs/jsr166y/ForkJoinTask.html.