Human papillomavirus type 16 causes larger colposcopic lesions than other HPV types in patients with grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-5

  Nam, Kyehyun ^a   Kwak, Jeongja ^a   Kim, Jeongsig ^a   Jeon, Seob ^a  

^a Soonchunhyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Human papillomavirus; Hybrid Capture 2; Lesion size; Squamous intraepithelial lesion

Indexed keywords

VIRUS DNA;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; COLPOSCOPY; DNA DETERMINATION; ELECTROSURGERY; EXCISION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 16; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENOPAUSE; PUNCH BIOPSY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; VIRUS IDENTIFICATION; VIRUS LOAD;

ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS 16; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VIRAL LOAD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871291001     PISSN: 10892591     EISSN: 15260976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825afd5b     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Scheungraber C, Koenig U, Fechtel B, Kuehne-Heid R, Duerst M, Schneider A. The colposcopic feature ridge signis associated with the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 and human papillomavirus 16 in young women. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2009;13:13-6.
2. Kierkegaard O, Byralsen C, Hansen KC, Frandsen KH, Frydenberg M. Association between colposcopic findings and histology in cervical lesions: the significance of the size of the lesion. Gynecol Oncol 1995;57:66-71.
3. Barton SE, Jenkins D, Hollingworth A, Cuzick J, Singer A. An explanation for the problem of false-negative cervical smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:482-5.
4. Kierkegaard O, Byrjalsen C, Frandsen KH, Hansen KC, Frydenberg M. Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and colposcopy in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:648-51.
5. Belinson JL, PretoriusRG, ZhangWH,Wu LY, Qiao YL, Elson P. Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:441-4.
6. Sherman ME, Wang SS, Tarone R, Rich L, Schiffman M. Histopathologic extent of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia3 lesions in the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study: implications for subject safety and lead-time bias. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:372-9.
7. Shafi MI, Finn CB, Luesley DM, Jordan JA, Dunn J. Lesion size and histology of atypical cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:490-2.
8. Jarmulowicz MR, Jenkins D, Barton SE, Goodall AL, Hollingworth A, Singer A. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:1061-6.
9. Jeronimo J, Massad LS, Schiffman M. Visual appearance of the uterine cervix: correlation with human papillomavirus detection and type. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197: 47.e1-8.
10. Louwers JA, Kocken M, van der Bijl JC, Berkhof J, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ, et al. Colposcopic characteristics of highrisk human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010;14:49-55.
11. Safaeian M, Schiffman M, Gage J, Solomon D, Wheeler CM, Castle PE. Detection of precancerous cervical lesions is differential by human papillomavirus type. Cancer Res 2009;69: 3262-6.
12. Ryu A, Nam K, Chung S, Kim J, Lee H, Koh E, et al. Absence of dysplasia in the excised cervix by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol 2010;21:87-92.
13. Nam K, Chung S, Kim J, Jeon S, Bae D. Factors associated with HPV persistence after conization in patients with negative margins. J Gynecol Oncol 2009;20:91-5.
14. Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Rollason M. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:1273-6.
15. Jeronimo J, Schiffman M. Colposcopy at a crossroads. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:349-53.
16. Pretorius RG, Bao YP, Belinson JL, Burchette RJ, Smith JS, Qiao YL. Inappropriate gold standard bias in cervical cancer screening studies. Int J Cancer 2007;121:2218-24.
17. Cox JT. More questions about the accuracy of colposcopy: what does this mean for cervical cancer prevention? Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1266-7.
18. Stoler MH, Vichnin MD, Ferenczy A, Ferris DG, Perez G, Paavonen J, et al. The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy: analyses from the placebo arm of the Gardasil clinical trials. Int J Cancer 2011;128:1354-62.
19. Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Zhang WH, Burchette RJ, Elson P, Qiao YL. The colposcopic impression. Is it nfluenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear? J Reprod Med 2001;46:724-8.
20. Sun CA, Lai HC, Chang CC, Neih S, Yu CP, Chu TY. The significance of human papillomavirus viral load in prediction of histologic severity and size of squamous intraepithelial lesions of uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:95-9.
21. Kovacic MB, Castle PE, Herrero R, Schiffman M, Sherman ME, Wacholder S, et al. Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality. Cancer Res 2006;66:10112-9.
22. Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1279-84.