Evaluation of the NICE mini-GRACE risk scores for acute myocardial infarction using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) 2003-2009: National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR)

Heart

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 35-40

  Simms, Alexander D ^a,b,c   Reynolds, Stephanie ^a   Pieper, Karen ^d   Baxter, Paul D ^a   Cattle, Brian A ^a   Batin, Phillip D ^e   Wilson, John I ^e   Deanfield, John E ^f   West, Robert M ^g   Fox, Keith A A ^h   Hall, Alistair S ^a,i   Gale, Christopher P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c YORK TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e PINDERFIELDS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADJUSTED MINI GLOBAL REGISTRY OF ACUTE CORONARY EVENTS RISK SCORE; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART FAILURE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINI GLOBAL REGISTRY OF ACUTE CORONARY EVENTS RISK SCORE; MORTALITY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; AGED; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; WALES;

EID: 84871279575     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302632     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bradshaw PJ, Ko DT, Newman AM, et al. Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set. Heart 2006;92:905-9. (Pubitemid 43974050)
2. Fox KAA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ 2006;333:1091-4. (Pubitemid 44863647)
3. Center for Outcomes Research UoMMS. Methods and formulas used to calculate the GRACE risk scores for patients presenting to hospital with an acute coronary syndrome. Worcester, MA: University of Massachusetts Medical School, 2011.
4. Gale CP, Manda SOM, Weston CF, et al. Evaluation of risk scores for risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes in the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) database. Heart 2009;95:221-7.
5. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2345-53. (Pubitemid 37310196)
6. Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al. Risk scores for risk stratifi cation in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1072-8. (Pubitemid 47343862)
7. Fox KA, Eagle KA, Gore JM, et al. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, 1999 to 2009 - GRACE. Heart 2010;96:1095-101.
8. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054.
9. Gray HH, Henderson RA, de Belder MA, et al. Early management of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance. Heart 2010;96:1662-8.
10. Gale CP, Cattle BA, Moore J, et al . Impact of missing data on standardised mortality ratios for acute myocardial infarction: evidence from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) 2004-7. Heart 2011;97:1926-31.
11. Herrett E, Smeeth L, Walker L, et al . The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Heart 2010;96:1264-7.
12. Royal College of Physicians. Unstable angina and NSTEMI: the early management of unstable angina and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: clinical guideline 94. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2010.
13. Department of Health. The National Service Framework for coronary heart disease: modern standards and service models. London: DOH, 2000.
14. Birkhead J, Walker L. National audit of myocardial infarction (MINAP): a project in evolution. Hosp Med 2004;65:452-3. (Pubitemid 39163804)
15. Birkhead JS. Responding to the requirements of the national service framework for coronary disease: a core data set for myocardial infarction. Heart 2000;84:116-17. (Pubitemid 30619719)
16. Rickards A, Cunningham D. From quantity to quality: the central cardiac audit database project. Heart 1999;82:II18-22. (Pubitemid 29469882)
17. National Institute Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR). The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) . London: University College London, 6 November, 2011.
18. Gale CP, Weston C, Denaxas S, et al. Engaging with the clinical data transparency initiative: a view from the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR). Heart 2012;98:1040-3.
19. National Institute Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR). Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP): How the NHS manages heart attacks. Tenth Public Report 2011. London: University College London, 2011.
20. Myocardial infarction redefined. A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1502-13.
21. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le CS, et al. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997;16:965-80. (Pubitemid 27198985)
22. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P Frontiers of econometrics . New York: Acad Press, 1974:105-42.
23. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 2010;21:128-38.
24. Great Britain. Health and social care act. London: The Stationary Office, 2012.
25. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. London: The Stationary Office, 2010.
26. Department of Health. Transparency in outcomes - a framework for the NHS. A consultation on proposals. London: The Stationary Office, 2010.
27. Fox KA, Anderson FA Jr, Dabbous OH, et al. Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Heart 2007;93:177-82. (Pubitemid 46180290)
28. Bhatt DL, Roe MT, Peterson ED, et al. Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2004;292:2096-104. (Pubitemid 39435100)
29. Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG, et al. Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest 2004;126:461-9. (Pubitemid 39093431)
30. Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2004;291:2727-33.
31. Elbarouni B, Goodman SG, Yan RT, et al. Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada. Am Heart J 2009;158:392-9.
32. Cattle BA, Baxter PD, Greenwood DC, et al. Multiple imputation for completion of a national clinical audit dataset. Stat Med 2011;30:2736-53.
33. Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet 2004;363:1147-54. (Pubitemid 38452790)