SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 193-196

Reporting on the comparison and interpretation of pattern evidence: Recommendations for forensic specialists

Author keywords

Expert witness; Expression; Guidelines; Identification; Interpretation; Opinion; Report

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871278261 PISSN: 00450618 EISSN: 1834562X Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2011.644260 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (20)

References (10)

1
- 68649108740
- Washington, DC: National Academies Press
- National Research Council (NAS). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
- (2009) Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward
- National Research Council (NAS)¹

2
- 69449098011
- Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
- Association of Forensic Science Providers (AFSP). Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Sci Justice. 2009;49:161-164.
- (2009) Sci Justice , vol.49 , pp. 161-164
- Association of Forensic Science Providers (AFSP)¹

3
- 84926070705
- Guidelines for expert witnesses in proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia. 2009. Available at: www.fedcourt.gov. au/how/prac-direction.html.
- (2009) Guidelines for Expert Witnesses in Proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia

4
- 70350009994
- The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear
- McQuiston-Surrett D, Saks MJ. The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. Law Human Behav. 2009;33:436.
- (2009) Law Human Behav , vol.33 , pp. 436
- McQuiston-Surrett, D.¹ Saks, M.J.²

5
- 0041819877
- Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
- Saks MJ, Risinger DM, Rosenthal R, Thompson WC. Context effects in forensic science: a review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States. Sci Justice. 2003;43:77-90.
- (2003) Sci Justice , vol.43 , pp. 77-90
- Saks, M.J.¹ Risinger, D.M.² Rosenthal, R.³ Thompson, W.C.⁴

6
- 30344478555
- Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications
- Dror IE, Charlton D, Peron AE. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;156:74-78.
- (2006) Forensic Sci Int. , vol.156 , pp. 74-78
- Dror, I.E.¹ Charlton, D.² Peron, A.E.³

7
- 47349123661
- Sequential unmasking: A means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation
- Krane D, Ford S, Gilder J, Inman K, Jamieson A, Koppl R, Kornfield I, Risinger D, Rudin N, Taylor M, Thompson WC. Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:1006-1007.
- (2008) J Forensic Sci. , vol.53 , pp. 1006-1007
- Krane, D.¹ Ford, S.² Gilder, J.³ Inman, K.⁴ Jamieson, A.⁵ Koppl, R.⁶ Kornfield, I.⁷ Risinger, D.⁸ Rudin, N.⁹ Taylor, M.¹⁰ Thompson, W.C.¹¹

8
- 0031796859
- A hierarchy of propositions: Deciding which level to address in casework
- Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ, Lambert JA. A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework. Sci Justice. 1998;38:231-239.
- (1998) Sci Justice , vol.38 , pp. 231-239
- Cook, R.¹ Evett, I.W.² Jackson, G.³ Jones, P.J.⁴ Lambert, J.A.⁵

9
- 0031847738
- A model for case assessment and interpretation
- Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ, Lambert JA. A model for case assessment and interpretation. Sci Justice. 1998;38:151-156.
- (1998) Sci Justice , vol.38 , pp. 151-156
- Cook, R.¹ Evett, I.W.² Jackson, G.³ Jones, P.J.⁴ Lambert, J.A.⁵

10
- 84871333124
- Criminalistics is reasoning backwards
- Berger C. Criminalistics is reasoning backwards. Nederlands Juistenblad. 2010;13:784-789.
- (2010) Nederlands Juistenblad , vol.13 , pp. 784-789
- Berger, C.¹

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.