A model for bidirectional community-academic engagement (CAE): Overview of partnered research, capacity enhancement, systems transformation, and public trust in research

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1806-1824

  Baquet, Claudia R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bidirectional community academic partnerships; Bioethics; Community engagement; Partnered research; Public trust in research; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SMOKING CESSATION; TRUST; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MARYLAND; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; SMOKING CESSATION; TRUST; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84871269995     PISSN: 10492089     EISSN: 15486869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0155     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jones L, Wells K. Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in communityparticipatory partnered research. JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):407-10.
2. Moreno G, Rodríguez MA, Lopez GA, et al. Eight years of building community partnerships and trust: the UCLA Family Medicine community-based participatory research experience. Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10):1426-33.
3. Michener JL, Champagne MT, Yaggy D, et al. Making a home in the community for the academic medical center. Acad Med. 2005 Jan;80(1):57-61.
4. The Clinical and Translational Science Award Committee. The challenge of meaningful community engagement. Boston, MA: The Clinical and Translational Science Award Committee, 2009.
5. National Institutes of Health. Meeting summary: improving health with communities: the role of community engagement in clinical and translational research. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 2009.
6. U.S. Census Bureau. State and county quickfacts. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009.
7. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Maryland plan to eliminate minority health disparities plan of action 2010-2014. Bethesda, MD: Maryland Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities, 2010.
8. Baquet CR, Bezuneh M, Novicky M, et al. Addressing health disparities through community-academic partnerships: the Maryland model. National AHEC Bulletin. 2005 Spring/Summer;21(2):47-9.
9. Baquet CR, Mack KM, Bramble J, et al. Maryland's special population cancer network: cancer health disparities reduction model. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 May;16(2):192-206.
10. Harris KJ, Berkley JY, Fisher JL, et al. Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. Am J Community Psychol. 1995 Oct;23(5):677-97.
11. Baquet CR, Mack KM, Mishra SI, et al. Maryland's special populations network. a model for cancer disparities research, education, and training. Cancer. 2006 Oct 15; 107(8 Suppl):2061-70.
12. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, et al. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 2011.
13. Baquet CR, Ellison GL, Mishra SI. Analysis of Maryland cancer patient participation in national cancer institute-supported cancer treatment clinical trials. J Clin Oncol.2008 Jul 10;26(20):3380-6.
14. Baquet CR, Henderson K, Commiskey P, et al. Clinical trials: the art of enrollment. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008 Nov;24(4):262-9.
15. Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Mullins CD, et al. Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):24-33. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A model for increasing availability of community-based cancer trials in rural eastern shore Maryland. Bethesda, MD: Committee on Public Health and Science, 2004.
17. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Prom. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):282-98.
18. Sandoval JA, Lucero J, Oetzel J, et al. Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res. 2011 Aug;27(4):680-90. Epub 2011 Sep 21.