Performance of the fullPIERS model in predicting adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia using patient data from the PIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) cohort, collected on admission

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 113-118

  Payne, B ^a   Hodgson, S ^a   Hutcheon, J A ^a   Joseph, K S ^a,b   Li, J ^a   Lee, T ^a   Magee, L A ^a,b,c   Qu, Z ^a   Von Dadelszen, P ^a,b  

^a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology ^*  (Canada)

^b School of Public and Population Health   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Patient care management; PIERS; pre eclampsia; prognosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRE-ECLAMPSIA INTEGRATED ESTIMATE OF RISK; PREECLAMPSIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HELLP SYNDROME; HUMANS; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATIENT ADMISSION; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84871245154     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03496.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, Broughton Pipkin F, Cote AM, etal. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet 2011; 377: 219-27.
2. Tajik P, Rengerink KO, Ganzevoort W, Zwinderman AH, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM,. Prediction of pre-eclampsia complications. Lancet 2011; 377: 1313-1313.
3. Sibai BM,. The HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets): much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 311-6. (Pubitemid 20068487)
4. Swets JA,. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285-93.
5. Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W,. Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 751-60.
6. Deeks JJ, Altman DG,. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 2004; 329: 168-9.
7. Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ,. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 467-71. (Pubitemid 32164897)