Collaborative innovation in emerging economies: Case of India and China

Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 467-476

  Pai, Da Chang ^a   Tseng, Chun Yao ^a   Liou, Cheng Hwai ^b  

^a TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAICHUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Collaborative innovation; Emerging economy; Innovative performance; Patent citation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871231859     PISSN: 14479338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.3.467     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the location of academic research: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145.
2. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
3. Beamish, P. W., & Killing, P. J. (Eds.). (1997). Cooperative strategies: European perspectives. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press.
4. Benner, C. (2003). Learning communities in a learning region: The soft infrastructure of cross-firm learning networks in Silicon Valley. Environment and Planning, 35, 1809-1830.
5. Bloom, N., & Reenen, J. V. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 112, 97-116.
6. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
8. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Todtliong, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe. London, England: Pinter.
9. Coombs, R., & Metcalfe. S. (1998). Distributed capabilities and the governance of the firm. CRIC discussion paper no. 16. Manchester University, England: ESRC Centre in Innovation and Competition.
10. Cusmano, L. (2000). Technology policy and cooperative R&D: The role of relational research capacity. Copenhagen Business School, IIES, Mimeo Druid No.00-3.
11. Dodgson, M., Mathews, J., & Kastelle, T. (2006). The evolving role of research consortia in East Asia. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 84-101.
12. Ernst, H. (2001). Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy, 30, 143-157.
13. Fisher, M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35, 199-216.
14. Fritch, M. (2004). R&D cooperation and the efficiency of regional innovation activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(6), 829-846.
15. Gertler, M., & Levitte, Y. (2005). Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation, 12(4), 487-507.
16. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London, England: Sage.
17. Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: Why they have distributed rather than distinctive core competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), 8-25.
18. Grant, R. M. (1996a). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 109-122.
19. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Prospering in dynamicallycompetitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 375-387.
20. Grupp, H., & Schmooh, U. (1999). Patent statistics in the age of globalization: New legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation. Research Policy, 28, 377-96.
21. Hall, B. H. (1999). Innovation and market value. NBER Working Paper # 6984. Berkeley, California: Department of Economics, University of California.
22. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
23. Love, J., & Roper, S. (2001). Location and network effects on innovation success: Evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants. Research Policy, 30, 643-662.
24. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
25. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. (Eds.). (1992). Networks and structure: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
26. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
27. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York, NY: Wiley.
28. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
29. Raven, R., & Verbong, G. (2004). Ruling out innovations - Technological regimes, rules and failures: The cases of heat pump power generation and bio-gas production in The Netherlands. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 6(2), 178-198.
30. Ritter, T., & Gemunden, H. G. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745-755.
31. Ronde, P., & Hussler, C. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does really matter? Research Policy, 3, 1150-1172.
32. Sherry, E. F., & Teece, D. J. (2004). Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation. Research Policy, 33, 179-191.
33. Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45-62.
34. Thomas, P., & McMillan, G. S. (2001). Using science and technology indicators to manage R&D as a business. Engineering Management Journal, 13, 9-14.
35. Tseng, C., & Wu, L. Y. (2007). Innovation quality in the automobile industry - measurement indicators and performance implications. International Journal of Technology Management, 37(1/2), 162-177.
36. Tseng, C. (2009). Technological innovation and knowledge network in Asia: Evidence from comparison of information and communication technologies among six countries. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76(5), 654-663.