Event-based criteria in GT-STAF information indices: Theory, exploratory diversity analysis and QSPR applications

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-34

  Barigye, S J ^a   Marrero Ponce, Y ^a,b   López, Y Martínez ^a,c   Santiago, O Martínez ^a   Torrens, F ^b   Domenech, R García ^b   Galvez, J ^b  

^a CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF LAS VILLAS   (Cuba)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE CAMAGÜEY   (Cuba)

Author keywords

cluster analysis; conditional and joint entropy; event; GT STAF; magnitude criterion; QSPR; Shannon's, mutual; TOMOCOMD CARDD

Indexed keywords

ENTROPY; INFORMATION THEORY; INFORMATION USE; QUANTUM THEORY;

CONDITIONAL ENTROPY; EVENT; EVENT-BASED; GT-STAF; JOINT ENTROPY; MAGNITUDE CRITERIA; QSPR; SHANNON; SHANNON, MUTUAL; TOMOCOMD-CARDD;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

EID: 84871224613     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2012.728994     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Crum-Brown, A. 1867. On an application of mathematics to chemistry. Proc. Roy. Soc., VI: 89-90.
2. Crum-Brown, A and Fraser, TR. 1868. On the connection between chemical constitution and physiological action. Part 1. On the physiological action of salts of the ammonium bases, derived from strychnia, brucia, thebia, codeia, morphia and nicotia. Trans. Roy. Soc., 25: 151-203.
3. Todeschini, R and Consonni, V. 2009. Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics, 1st, Vol. 1, 667Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
4. Brown, SD, Blank, TB, Sum, ST and Weyert, LG. 1994. Chemometrics. Anal. Chem., 66: 315R-359R.
5. Lavine, BK. 1998. Chemometrics. Anal. Chem., 70: 209R-228R.
6. Krishna Murty, EV. 1985. Computer Modeling of Complex Biological Systems, 77Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
7. Barigye, SJ, Marrero-Ponce, Y, Martínez-Santiago, O, Martínez-López, Y and Torrens, F. 2012. Shannon's, mutual, conditional and joint entropy-based information indices. Generalization of molecular descriptors defined from LOVIs. Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des.,
8. Barigye, SJ, Marrero-Ponce, Y, Martínez López, Y, Artiles Martínez, LM, Pino-Urias, RW, Martínez Santiago, O and Torrens, F. 2012. Relations frequency hypermatrices in mutual, conditional and joint entropy-based information indices. J. Comput. Chem., DOI:10.1002/jcc.23123
9. Gorbátov, VA. 1988. Fundamentos de la Matematica discreta, Mir, Moscow: URSS.
10. Hall, LH and Kier, LB. 1978. Molecular Connectivity and Substructure Analysis. J. Pharm. Sci., 67: 1743-1747.
11. Hall, LH and Kier, LB. 1978. A comparative analysis of molecular connectivity, Hansch, Free-Wilson and Darc-Pelco methods in the SAR of halogenated phenols. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 13: 89-92.
12. Kier, LB and Hall, LH. 1999. Molecular Structure Description. The Electrotopological State, San Diego: Academic Press.
13. Jäntschi, L. 2002. Graph Theory. 1. Fragmentation of Structural Graphs. Leonardo Electron. J. Pract. Technol., 1: 19-36.
14. Janezic, D, Milicevic, A, Nikolic, S and Trinajstic, N. Graph Theoretical Matrices in Chemistry, University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Kragujevac, Serbia, 2007
15. Skvortsova, MI and Stankevich, IV. 2005. Eigenvectors of weighted graphs: A supplement to Sachs' theorem. J. Mol. Struct., 719: 213-223.
16. Sachs, H. 1964. Beziehungen zwischen den in einem graphen enthaltenen Kreisen und seinem characteristischen Polynom. Publ. Math., 11: 119-134.
17. Cvetkovi¢, D, Doob, M and Sachs, H. 1979. Spectra of Graphs-Theory and Application, Academic Press.
18. Gutman, I. 2003. Impact of the Sachs Theorem on theoretical chemistry: A participant's testimony. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 48: 17-34.
19. Jun-ichi, A. 1975. General rules for constructing Huckel molecular orbital characteristic polynomials. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98: 6840-6844.
20. Mallion, RB, Schwenk, AJ and Trinajstic, N. 1974. A graphical study of heteroconjugated molecules. Croat. Chem. Acta, 46: 171
21. Morrison, RT and Boyd, RN. 1992. Organic Chemistry, 6th, New Delhi: Prentice-Hall.
22. Guha, R. The CDK Descriptor Calculator, 0.94 ed., Indiana, 1991, available athttp://cheminfo.informatics.indiana.edu/~rguha/code/java/cdkdesc.html
23. Steinbeck, C, Han, YQ, Kuhn, S, Horlacher, O, Luttmann, E and Willighagen, EL. 2003. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An open-source Java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43: 493-500.
24. Guha, R, Howard, MT, Hutchison, GR, Murray-Rust, P, Rzepa, H, Steinbeck, C, Wegner, JK and Willighagen, EL. 2006. The Blue Obelisk-Interoperability in Chemical Informatics. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46: 991-998.
25. Landrum, G. RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics, available athttp://www.rdkit.org
26. Durant, JL, Leland, BA, Henry, DR and Nourse, JG. 2002. Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 42: 1273-1280.
27. MACCS Drug Data Report, 2000.2, MDL Information Systems, Inc. 14600 Catalina Street, San Leandro, CA 94577, 2000
28. Kier, LB and Hall, LH. 1990. An electrotopological-state index for atoms in molecules. Pharm. Res., 7: 801-807.
29. Hall, LH and Kier, LB. 1995. Electrotopological state indices for atom types: A novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 35: 1039-1045.
30. Ghose, AK and Crippen, GM. 1987. Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional-structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 2. Modeling dispersive and hydrophobic interactions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 27: 21-35.
31. Bonchev, D. 2005. My life-long journey in mathematical chemistry. Internet Electron. J. Mol. Des., 4: 434-490.
32. Bonchev, D. 1983. Information-Theoretic Indices for Characterization of Chemical Structures, Chichester, UK: Research Studies Press.
33. Barnard, JM and Downs, GM. 1992. Clustering of chemical structures on the basis of two-dimensional similarity measures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32: 644-649.
34. Basak, SC, Gute, BD and Balaban, AT. 2004. Interrelationship of major topological indices evidenced by clustering. Croat. Chem. Acta, 77: 331-344.
35. Brown, RD and Martin, YC. 1996. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36: 572-584.
36. MacCuish, J, Nicolaou, C and MacCuish, NE. 2001. Ties in proximity and clustering compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41: 134-146.
37. Jain, AK and Dubes, RC. Algorithms for Clustering Data, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, March 1988
38. Milligan, GW. 1996. "Clustering validation: Results and implications for applied analyses". In Clustering and Classification, Edited by: Arabie, P, Hubert, L and Soete, GD. 345-375. Singapore: World Scientific.
39. Estrada, E and Molina, E. 2001. Novel local (fragment-based) topological molecular descriptors for QSPR/QSAR and Molecular Design. J. Mol. Graphics Model, 20: 54-64.
40. Wold, S and Erikson, L. 1995. "Statistical validation of QSAR results. Validation tools". In Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design, Edited by: van de Waterbeemd, H. 309-318. Weinheim, Germany: VCH Publishers.
41. Todeschini, R, Consonni, V, Mauri, A and Pavan, M. MOBYDIGS version 1.0, Milano, 2005; available athttp://www.talete.mi.it/mobydigs.htm
42. Topliss, JG and Edwards, RP. 1979. Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem., 22: 1238-1244.
43. Zhao, Y and Karypis, G. 2004. Empirical and theoretical comparisons of selected criterion functions for document clustering. Machine Learning, 55: 311-331.
44. Mannhold, R, Dross, K and Rekker, RF. 1990. Drug lipophilicity in QSAR practice.1. A comparison of experimental with calculative approaches. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat., 9: 21-28.
45. Rekker, RF, Mannhold, R and ter Laak, AM. 1993. On reliability of calculated P-values: Rekker,Hansch/Leo and Suzuki approach. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat., 12: 152-157.
46. Mannhold, R, Rekker, RF, Sonntag, C, ter Laak, AM, Dross, K and Polymeropoulos, EE. 1995. Comparative evaluation of the predictive power of calculation procedures for molecular lipophilicity. J. Pharm. Sci., 84: 1410-1419.
47. Mannhold, R, Cruciani, G, Dross, K and Rekker, RF. 1998. Multivariate analysis of experimental and computational descriptors of molecular lipophilicity. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 12: 573-581.
48. Ghose, AK, Viswanadhan, VN and Wendoloski, JJ. 1998. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods. J. Phys. Chem. A, 102: 3762-3772.
49. Petrauskas, AA and Kolovanov, EA. 2000. ACD approaches for PHYS-Chem data prediction, Düsseldorf: 13th Eur. Symp on QSAR. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat., p. 84
50. Moriguchi, I, Hirono, S, Liu, Q, Nakagome, I and Matsushita, Y. 1992. Simple method of calculating octanol/water partition coefficient. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 40: 127-130.