Federalism, decentralization, and reproductive rights in Argentina and Chile

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 129-150

  Franceschet, Susan ^a   Piscopo, Jennifer M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b Salem College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871222740     PISSN: 00485950     EISSN: 17477107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjs021     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bland, Gary. 2004. Enclaves and elections: The decision to decentralize in Chile. In Decentralization and democracy in Latin America, ed. A. Montero, and D. Samuels. 94-121. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
2. CoNDeRs. 2006. Monitorear los derechos sexuales y reproductivos: Una práctica de democracia participativa. CoNDeRs: Buenos Aires, Argentina.
3. -. 2008a. Derechos sexuales y reproductivos en Argentina. CoNDeRs: Buenos Aires, Argentina.
4. -. 2008b. Proyecto de monitoreo de las provincias: Chubut. CoNDeRs: Buenos Aires, Argentina.
5. Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 2004. Do federal institutions matter? Rules and political practices in resource allocation in Mexico. In Federalism and democracy in Latin America, ed. Edward L. Gibson. 297-322. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
6. -. 2006. Federalism, fiscal authority, and centralization in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dides, Claudia, María C. Benavente, and José M. Morán. 2010. Entrega de la píldora anticonceptiva de emergencia en el sistema de salud municipal, Chile. Santiago: FLACSOChile, UNFPA.
8. -. 2011. Entrega de la píldora anticonceptiva de emergencia en el sistema de salud municipal: Estado de situacio'n 2010. Santiago: FLACSO-Chile, UNFPA.
9. Eaton, Kent. 2004a. Designing subnational institutions: Regional and municipal reforms in postauthoritarian Chile. Comparative Political Studies 37 (2): 218-244.
10. -. 2004b. Risky business: Decentralization from above in Chile and Uruguay. Comparative Politics 37 (1): 1-22.
11. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria. 2001. Decentralization and federalism in Latin America. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 31 (4): 23-41.
12. Falleti, Tulia G. 2004. Federalism and decentralization in Argentina. In Decentralization and democratic governance in Latin America, ed. Joseph S. Tulchin and Andrew Selee. 67-100. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
13. -. 2010. Decentralization and subnational politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Faur, Eleonor, and Natalia Gherardi. 2005. Sexualidades y reproducción. In Informe sobre género y derechos humanos: Vigencia y respeto de los derechos de las mujeres en Argentina, ed. Natalia Gherardi, 169-206. Buenos Aires: ELA, Editorial Biblos.
15. Gervasoni, Carlos. 2010. A rentier theory of subnational regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Politics 62 (2): 302-340.
16. Gibson, Edward L. 2004. Federalism and democracy: Theoretical connections and cautionary insights. In Federalism and democracy in Latin America, ed. Edward L. Gibson, 1-28. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Gideon, Jasmine. 2001. The decentralization of primary health care delivery in Chile. Public Administration and Development 21: 223-231.
18. Guzmán, Virginia, Ute Seibert, and Silke Staab. 2010. Democracy in the country but not in the home? Religion, politics, and women's rights in Chile. Third World Quarterly 31 (6): 971-988.
19. Haggard, Stephen. 2000. The politics of decentralization in Latin America. In Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. Shahid J. Burki and Guillermo E. Perry, 33-44. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
20. Homedes, Núria, and Antonio Ugalde. 2005. Why neoliberal health reforms have failed in Latin America. Health Policy 71: 83-96.
21. Htun, Mala, and S. Laurel Weldon. 2010. When do governments promote women's rights? Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 207-216.
22. Irving, Helen. 2008. Gender and the constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Jones, Mark P., and Wonjae Hwang. 2005. Provincial party bosses: Keystone of the Argentine Congress. In Argentine democracy: The politics of institutional weakness, ed. Steven Levitsky and María V. Murillo, 115-138. Pennsylvania Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
24. Jones, Mark P., Sebastian Saiegh, Pablo T. Spiller, and Mariano Tommasi. 2002. Amateur legislators, professional politicians: The consequences of party-centered electoral rules in a federal system. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 656-669.
25. Kaufman, Robert R., and Joan M. Nelson, eds. 2004. Crucial needs, weak incentives: Social sector reform, democratization, and globalization in Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Kubal, M. Rose. 2006. Contradictions and constraints in Chile's health care and education decentralization. Latin American Politics and Society 48 (4): 105-135.
27. Letelier, Leonardo. 2006. Local government organization and finance: Chile. In Local governance in developing countries, ed. Anwar Shah, 419-447. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
28. Lopreite, D. 2008. Challenging the Argentina Gender Regime? The Politics of Reproductive Rights After Democratization. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
29. McGuire, James. 2010a. Health, wealth, and democracy. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
30. -. 2010b. Political factors and health outcomes: Insight from Argentina's provinces. United Nations Development Research Paper.
31. El Mercurio. 2008a. TC notifica fallo sobre "píldora del día después" que prohibe su distribución en sistema público. April 18.
32. -. 2008b. Presidente de la asociación de municipios: Tenemos autonomía para entregar la píldora. April 21.
33. -. 2008c. Ministra de salud niega que se haya desistido de entregar la píldora en los municipios. July 31.
34. -. 2008d. Alcalde de Puento Alto se opone al entrega de píldora pese a costo electoral. May 22.
35. -. 2009. Tras fallo de Controlaría, Rossi anuncia que distribuirá gratis la píldora del día después. June 19.
36. Molyneux, Maxine. 2007. Change and continuity in social protection in Latin America. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
37. Montero, Alfred P., and David J. Samuels. 2004. The political determinants of decentralization in Latin America: Causes and consequences. In Decentralization and democracy in Latin America, ed. Alfred Montero and David Samuels, 3-32. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
38. Mooney, Christopher Z. 2000. The decline of federalism and the rise of morality policy conflict in the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30 (1/2): 171-188.
39. Mustapic, A. María. 2010. Political parties and democracy in Argentina: 1983-2008. In Political parties and democracy: The Americas, ed. Kay Lawson and Jorge Lanzaro, 51-72. New York: Praeger.
40. La Nación. 2007. Bachelet firma polémico decreto en favor de la píldora del día después. January 30.
41. Pierson, Paul. 1995. Fragmented welfare states: Federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance 8 (4): 449-478.
42. Serrano, Claudia. 2004. State decentralization and regional actors in Chile. In Decentralization, democratic governance, and civil society in comparative perspective, ed. Philip Oxhorn, Joseph Tulchin, and Andrew Selee, 82-118. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Smulovitz, Catalina. 2010. The unequal distribution of legal rights: Who gets what and where in the Argentinean provinces? Paper Presented at the Latin American Studies Association, Toronto, Canada.
44. Vickers, Jill. 2010. A two-way street: Federalism and women's rights policies in Canada and the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 412-435.
45. Wallner, Jennifer. 2010. Beyond national standards: Reconciling the tension between federalism and the welfare state. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (4): 646-671.