Reporting the 'education revolution': MySchool.edu.au in the print media

Discourse

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-16

  Mockler, Nicole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

media analysis; neoliberalism; politics of education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871191530     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2012.698860     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. A little scrutiny goes a long way. [Editorial]. 2010, May 10. Canberra Times, p. 8.
2. A test of schools and governments. [Editorial]. 2010, January 20. The Age, p. 12.
3. A test the teachers must pass. [Editorial]. 2010, April 12. The Australian, p. 15.
4. A victory for everybody who believes in education. [Editorial]. 2010, January 30. The Australian, p. 15.
5. Accountability is essential to improve all our schools. [Editorial]. 2010, May 1. The Australian, p. 15.
6. Apple, M.W. 2006. Educating the 'right' way: Markets, standards, god and inequality, 2nd ed., New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
7. Apple, M.W. 2009. Can critical education interrupt the right?. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3): 239-251. doi:10.1080/01596300903036814
8. Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA) 2010. My School. Retrieved from www.myschool.edu.au
9. Australian Education Union (AEU). 2009a, December 14. AEU calls for negotiations on genuine school accountability and improvement measures [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.aeufederal.org.au/Media/MediaReleases/2009/1412.pdf
10. Australian Education Union. 2009b. Charter of school accountability, improvement, assessment and reporting. Sydney: Australian Education Union.
11. Australian Education Union. 2010a, May 6. AEU lifts moratorium on naplan tests [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.aeufederal.org.au/Media/MediaReleases/2010/0605.pdf
12. Australian Education Union. 2010b, April 9. Failure to meet must be explained [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.aeufederal.org.au/Media/MediaReleases/2010/0904.pdf
13. Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations 2010a. Digital education revolution-overview. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/Pages/default.aspx
14. Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations 2010b. Transparency, reporting and assessment. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/Programs/SmarterSchools/Pages/Trans_report_assess.aspx
15. Ball, S. 2008. The education debate, Bristol: The Policy Press.
16. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and Wiliam, D. 2004. Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1): 8
17. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. 1998. Inside the black box. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2): 139-147.
18. Blackmore, J. and Thomson, P. 2004. Just 'good and bad news'? Disciplinary imaginaries of head teachers in Australian and English print media. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3): 301-320. doi:10.1080/0268093042000207638
19. Boje, D.M. 2001. Narrative methods for organizational and communication research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Brown, R.H. 1991. Rhetoric, textuality and the postmodern turn in sociological theory. Sociological Theory.
21. Cohen, J. 2010. Teachers in the news: A critical analysis of one US newspaper's discourse on education, 2006-2007. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1): 105-119. doi:10.1080/01596300903465450
22. Could do better. [Editorial]. 2010, May 5. The Daily Telegraph, p. 24.
23. Derrida, J. 1999. Hospitality, justice and responsibility: A dialogue with Jacques Derrida. In R. Kearney & M. Dooley, Questioning ethics: Contemporary debates in philosophy (pp. 65-83). London and New York: Routledge.
24. Entman, R. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
25. Entman, R. 2003. Cascading activation: Contesting the white house's frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4): 415-432. doi:10.1080/10584600390244176
26. Entman, R. 2007. Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of communication, 57(1): 163-173. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
27. Entman, R. 2010. Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of campaign 2008. Journalism, 11(4): 389 doi:10.1177/1464884910367587
28. Featherstone, S. 2002. "Yes-but logic: The quasi science of cultural reproduction". In Cultural reproduction, 2nd ed, Edited by: Jenks, C. 55-68. London: Routledge.
29. Gardner, H. and Dyson, V. 1994. Teaching for understanding in the disciplines-and beyond. Teachers College Record, 96(2): 198-218.
30. Gillard, J. 2009, November 17. The education revolution-two years on: Address to the 4th annual Australian National Schools Network Forum [Speech]. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Speeches/Pages/Article_091117_171753.aspx
31. Goffman, E. 1974. Framing analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Informative comparison of schools. [Editorial]. 2010, January 23. The Advertiser, p. 70.
33. Iyengar, S. 1990. Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1): 19-40. doi:10.1007/BF00992330
34. Iyengar, S. 1991. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. League of difference on ranking schools. [Editorial]. 2010, January 30. The Australian, p. 15.
36. Merit-based systems lift quality. [Editorial]. 2010, May 4. The Australian, p. 13.
37. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). 2008. Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Canberra: MCEETYA.
38. Our Schools Should be Accountable. [Editorial]. 2010, January 28. The Courier-Mail, p. 28.
39. Parents are not dunces. [Editorial]. 2010, January 21. Herald Sun, p. 30.
40. Power, M. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Rank schools to get results. [Editorial]. 2010, January 28. Herald Sun, p. 30.
42. Ranson, S. 2003. Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5): 459-480. doi:10.1080/0268093032000124848
43. Schools ranking an important tool. [Editorial]. 2010, January 29. Canberra Times, p. 20.
44. School site a good start. [Editorial]. 2010, January 29. NorthernTerritory News, p. 10.
45. School system must cater for all students. [Editorial]. 2010, June 7. The Advertiser, p. 18.
46. Shine a light into public school shadows. [Editorial]. 2010, January 9. The West Australian, p. 32.
47. Stack, M. 2006. Testing, testing, read all about it: Canadian press coverage of the PISA results. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'Èducation, 29(1): 49-69. doi:10.2307/20054146
48. Street, J. 2001. Mass media, politics and democracy, New York, NY: Palgrave.
49. Students will benefit from school scrutiny. [Editorial]. 2009, December 15. The Advertiser, p. 18.
50. Teachers have no justification for test boycott. [Editorial]. 2010, April 13. The West Australian, p. 20.
51. Testing time for schools. [Editorial]. 2010, May 15. The Australian, p. 15.
52. Testing time for teachers. [Editorial]. 2010, January 21. Sydney Morning Herald, p. 12.
53. The test results will hit the fan this week. [Editorial]. 2010, January 25. Canberra Times, p. 12.
54. Top of the class for selfishness. [Editorial]. 2010, January 19. The Australian, p. 13.
55. Transparency at heart of debate. [Editorial]. 2009, November 19. Canberra Times, p. 18.
56. Union tests limit with ultimatum. [Editorial]. 2010, April 14. Canberra Times, p. 18.
57. Website offers real information for parents. [Editorial]. 2010, January 29. The West Australian, p. 20.
58. Why we are publishing a league table. [Editorial]. 2010, January 29. Sydney Morning Herald, p. 14.