Effectiveness of multimedia aids to enhance comprehension of research consent information: A systematic review

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1-15

  Palmer, Barton W ^a   Lanouette, Nicole M ^a   Jeste, Dilip V ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIMEDIA; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MULTIMEDIA; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84871187326     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Norris DR, Phillips MR. Using instructive videotapes to increase patient comprehension of informed consent, Journal of Clinical Research and Pharmacoepidemiology 1990;4(4):263-268.
2. Dunn LB, Lindamer LA, Palmer BW, et al. Improving understanding of research consent in middle-aged and elderly patients with psychotic disorders. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2002;10(2):142-150.
3. Wirshing DA, Sergi MJ, Mintz J. A videotape intervention to enhance the informed consent process for medical and psychiatric treatment research. American Journal of Psychiatry 2005;162(1):186-188.
4. Moser DJ, Reese RL, Hey CT, et al. Using a brief intervention to improve decisional capacity in schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2006;32(1):116-120.
5. Hutchison C, Cowan C, McMahon T, Paul J. A randomized controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trials. British Journal of Cancer 2007;97(6):705-711.
6. Hutchison C, McCreaddie M. The process of developing audiovisual patient information: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007;16(11):2047-2055.
7. Strevel EL, Newman C, Pond CR, et al. The impact of an educational DVD on cancer patients considering participation in a phase I clinical trial. Supportive Care in Cancer 2007;15(7):829-840.
8. Hultgren B, Zaghi S, Carvas M, et al. Challenges in consenting subjects for studies with brain stimulation: Feasibility of multimedia vide use during the informed consent process. Brain Stimulation 2009;2(3):174-178.
9. Kass NE, Sugarman J, Medley AM, et al. An intervention to improve cancer patients' understanding of early-phase clinical trials. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2009:31(3):1-10.
10. Karunaratne, AS, Korenman SC, Thomas SL, et al. Improving communication when seeking informed consent: A randomized controlled study of a computer-based method for providing information to prospective clinical trial participants. Medical Journal of Australia 2010;192(7):388-392.
11. " O'Lonergan TA, Forster-Harwood JE. Novel approach to parental permission and child assent for research: Improving comprehension. Pediatrics 2011;127(5):917-924.
12. Fureman I, Meyers K, McLellan AT, et al. Evaluation of a video-supplement to informed consent: Injection drug users and preventive HIV vaccine efficacy trials. AIDS Education and Prevention 1997;9(4):330-341.
13. Bandura A. Socio/Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
14. Weston J, Hannah M, Downes J. Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process. Patient Education and Counseling 1997;30(3):239-245.
15. Agre P, Rapkin B. Improving informed consent: A comparison of four consent tools. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2003;25(6):1-7.
16. Bickmore TW, Pfeifer LM, Paasche-Orlow MK. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling 2009;75(3):315-320.
17. Jeste DV, Palmer BW, Colshan S, et al. Multimedia consent for research in people with schizophrenia and normal subjects: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2009;35(4):719-729.
18. Mayer RE. Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
19. McCraw SA, Wood-Nutter CA, Solomon MZ, et al. Clarity and appeal of a multimedia informed consent tool for biobanking. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2012;34(1):9-19.
20. Benson PR, Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, et al. Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research. Law and Human Behavior 1988:455-475.
21. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Thiel EC, Sem FW, Woermke DE. Presenting clinical trial information: A comparison of methods. Patient Education and Counseling 1995;25(2):97-107.
22. Campbell FA, Goldman BD, Boccia ML, Skinner M. The effect of format modifications and reading of print, video, and computer-based presentations. Patient Education and Counseling 2004;53(2):205-216.
23. Mittal D, Palmer BW, Dunn LB, et al. Comparison of two enhanced consent procedures for patients with mild Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2007;15(2):163-167.