Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology

Journal of Dental Biomechanics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-8

  Hansson, Stig ^a   Halldin, Anders ^a,b  

^a Astra Tech AB   (Sweden)

^b MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone resorption; Implant; Tooth extraction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871176528     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17587360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1758736012456543     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, et al. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 1044-1049.
2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313-323.
3. Lindquist LW, Rockler B and Carlssen GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 59-63.
4. Werbitt MJ and Goldberg PV. The immediate implant: bone preservation and bone regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12: 202-217.
5. Denissen HW, Kalk W, Veldhuis HAH, et al. Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 191-196.
6. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1560-1571.
7. Botticelli D, Berglundh T and Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 820-828.
8. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 645-652.
9. Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, et al. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 351-358.
10. Araújo MG and Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212-218.
11. Cardaropoli G, Araújo M and Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 809-818.
12. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone: a clinical and histological study in humans. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 990-999.
13. Araújo MG and Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss™ collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 433-440.
14. Araújo MG and Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 9-13.
15. Roux W. Der Kampf der Teile im Organismus. Ein Beitrag zur Vervollständigung der mechanischen Zweckmässigkeitslehre. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1881.
16. Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: August Hirschwald, 1892.
17. Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN. Theory of elasticity. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Book Company, 1982.
18. Lanyon LE. Experimental support for the trajectorial theory of bone structure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974; 56: 160-166.
19. Skedros JG and Baucom SL. Mathematical analysis of trabecular 'trajectories' in apparent trajectorial structures: the unfortunate historical emphasis on the human proximal femur. J Theor Biol 2007; 244: 15-45.
20. Pontzer H, Lieberman DE, Momin E, et al. Trabecular bone in the bird knee responds with high sensitivity to changes in load orientation. J Exp Biol 2006; 209: 57-65.
21. Petrtýl M, Hert J and Fiala P. Spatial organization of the haversian bone in man. J Biomech 1996; 29: 161-169.
22. Stanford CM and Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 553-561.
23. Qin Y-X, Rubin CT and McLeod KJ. Nonlinear dependence of loading intensity and cycle number in the maintenance of bone mass and morphology. J Orthop Res 1998; 16: 482-489.
24. Rubin CT, Sommerfeldt DW, Judex S, et al. Inhibition of osteopenia by low magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli. Drug Discov Today 2001; 6: 848-858.
25. Cawson RA and Odell EW. Cawson's essentials of oral pathology and oral medicine. USA: Elsevier Limited, 2008.
26. Pini M, Zysset PH, Botsis J, et al. Tensile and compressive behaviour of the bovine periodontal ligament. J Biomech 2004; 37: 111-119.
27. Sanctuary CS, Wiskott HW, Justiz J, et al. In vitro timedependent response of periodontal ligament to mechanical loading. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 2369-2378.
28. Uhthoff HK and Jaworski ZFG. Bone loss in response to long-term immobilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978; 60: 420-429.
29. Hart RT, Hennebel VV, Throngpreda N, et al. Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Biomech 1992; 25: 261-286.
30. Rønold HJ, Ellingsen JE and Lyngstadaas SP. Tensile force testing of optimized coin-shaped titanium implant attachment kinetics in the rabbit tibiae. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 843-849.
31. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 394-405.
32. Hansson S and Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech 2003; 36: 1247-1258.
33. Palmer RM, Palmer PJ and Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 179-182.
34. Wennström JL, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, et al. Implantsupported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 567-574.
35. Lee D-W, Choi Y-S, Park K-H, et al. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 465-470.
36. Atwood DA and Willard AC. Clinical, cephalometric, and densitometric study of reduction of residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 26: 280-295.
37. Pietrokovski J and Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17: 21-27.
38. Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, et al. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010; 21: 13-21.
39. Fiorellini J, Parker W, Nölken R, et al. Marginal bone support at OsseoSpeed™ profile implants. In: Poster presented at Academy of Osseointegration annual meeting, Washington, DC, March 3-5, 2011, poster #126.