Optimized kernel space based algorithm for quality data analysis

Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 48, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 182-188

  Wang, Meng ^a   Sun, Shudong ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Equivalence relation; Manifold learning; Quality improvement; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTION REDUCTION; DATA COUPLING; DATA PREPARATION; DATA-MINING TOOLS; EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS; IMBALANCE DISTRIBUTIONS; KERNEL SPACE; MANIFOLD LEARNING; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; QUALITY DATA; QUALITY FACTORS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES ALGORITHMS;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; FACTOR ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; SET THEORY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84871144215     PISSN: 05776686     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3901/JME.2012.22.182     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. KÖKSAL G, BATMAZ Ì, TESTIK M C. A review of data mining applications for quality improvement in manufacturing industry[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38: 13448-13467.
2. HARDING J, SHAHBAZ M, KUSIAK A. Data mining in manufacturing: A review[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2006, 128: 969-976.
3. TANG Jiafu, YAO Jianming, et al. Method of determining the importance ratings of customer requirements improvement for house of quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 43(11): 110-118.
4. ZHENG Lianyu, TANG Xiaoqing, WANG Shuchun. QFD-Based optimization planning for process quality in NC machining[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2001, 37(8): 38-42.
5. TANG Xiaoqing, WANG Xuecong. Customer-oriented quality improvement in mass customization[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2005, 41(5): 200-204.
6. ROKACH L, MAIMON O. Data mining for improving the quality of manufacturing: A feature set decomposition approach[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2006, 17(3): 285-299.
7. KARIM M, HALGAMUGE S, SMITH A, et al. Manufacturing yield improvement by clustering[J]. Neural Information Processing, 2006: 526-534.
8. VAPNIK V N. The nature of statistical learning theory[M]. New York: Springer, 2000.
9. VAPNIK V N. Statical learning theory[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
10. FLEURET F, SAHBI H. Scale-invariance of support vector machines based on the triangular kernel[C/CD]// In 3rd International Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision at ICCV, October 12, 2003, France, Nice.
11. LI S, FEVENS T, KRZYZAK A, et al. Automatic clinical image segmentation using pathological modeling, PCA and SVM[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 19(4): 403-410.
12. GUMUS E, KILIC N, SERTBAS A, et al. Evaluation of face recognition techniques using PCA, wavelets and SVM[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(9): 6404-6408.
13. LIN F, YEH C C, LEE M Y. The use of hybrid manifold learning and support vector machines in the prediction of business failure[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24(1): 95-101.
14. ROWEIS S, SAUL L. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding[J]. Science, 2000, 290(5500): 2323-2326.
15. TENENBAUM J, SILVA V, LANGFORD J. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction[J]. Science, 2000, 290(5500): 2319-2322.
16. SCHÖLKOPF B, SMOLA A J. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.
17. COX M, COX T. Multidimensional Scaling[M]. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2001.