Plant diversity and conservation value of continental temporary pools

Biological Conservation

Volumn 158, Issue , 2013, Pages 393-400

  Lukács, Balázs A ^a   Sramkó, Gábor ^b   Molnár V, Attila ^c  

^a MTA CENTRE FOR ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Hungary)

^b EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Additive diversity partitioning; Agriculture; Elatine; Habitat types; Iso to Nanojuncetea; Lindernia procumbens; Temporary ponds; Vascular plants

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC PLANT; ARABLE LAND; BIOINDICATOR; CLIMATIC REGION; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DICOTYLEDON; ECOREGION; EPHEMERAL POOL; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT TYPE; NICHE PARTITIONING; PLANT COMMUNITY; RED LIST; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WATERLOGGING; WETLAND;

PANNONIAN BASIN;

ELATINE; LINDERNIA PROCUMBENS; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 84871123587     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Albrecht H. Vergesellschaftung, Standorteigenschaften und Populationsökologie von Arten der Klasse Isoëto-Nanojuncetea auf Ackerflächen. Mitt. Bad. Landesver. Naturk. 1999, 17:403-417.
2. Bagella S., Caria M.C. Diversity and ecological characteristics of vascular flora in Mediterranean temporary pools. Compt. Rend. Biol. 2012, 335:69-76.
3. Bambaradeniya C.N.B., Edirisinghe J.P., De Silva D.N., Gunatilleke C.V.S., Ranawana K.B., Wijekoon S. Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in Sri Lanka. Biodiv. Conserv. 2004, 13:1715-1753.
4. Baumann K., Täuber T. Kleinseggenriede und Zwergbinsen-Gesellschaften der Stauteiche des Westharzes-ökologische Bedingungen und Schutzkonzepte. Hercynia 1999, 32:127-147.
5. Bissels S., Donath T.W., Hölzel N., Otte A. Ephemeral wetland vegetation in irregularly flooded arable fields along the northern Upper Rhine: the importance of persistent seedbanks. Phytocoenologia 2005, 35:469-488.
6. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie 1951, Springer Verlag, Wien.
7. Csiky J., Oláh E. The red list of Nanocyperion like species in Dráva Plain (South Hungary). Nat. Somogy. 2006, 9:5-26.
8. Davies B.R., Biggs J., Williams P., Whitfield M., Nicolet P., Sear D., Bray S., Maund S. Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 125:1-8.
9. Deil U. A review on habitats, plant traits and vegetation of ephemeral wetlands - a global perspective. Phytocoenologia 2005, 35:533-705.
10. den Hartog C., Segal S. A new classification of water plant communities. Acta Botan. Neerl. 1964, 13:367-393.
11. Dierschke, H., 1994. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundlagen und Methoden, Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
12. Dudgeon D., Arthington A.H., Gessner M.O., Kawabata Z., Knowler D., Léveque C., Naiman R.J., Prieur-Richard A.-H., Soto D., Stiassny M.L.J., Sullivan C.A. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, status, and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81:163-182.
13. EEA, 2002. Ecoregion for Rivers and Lakes. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/biogeographical-regions-in-europe.
14. Ellenberg H. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe 1988, Cambridge University Press, New York.
15. Eros T. Partitioning the diversity of riverine fish: the roles of habitat types and non-native species. Freshwater Biol. 2007, 52:1400-1415.
16. Fairchild G.W., Cruz J., Faulds A.M., Short A.E.Z., Matta J.F. Microhabitat and landscape influences on aquatic beetle assemblages in a cluster of temporary and permanent ponds. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2003, 22:224-240.
17. Giora M., Schaffers A., Barco G., Freehan J. The conservation value of farmland ponds: predicting water beetle assemblages using vascular plants as a surrogate group. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:1125-1133.
18. Grillas, P., Gauthier, P., Yavercovski, N., Perennou, C., 2004. Mediterranean Temporary Pools, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles.
19. Hoffmann J., Mirschel W., Cebulsky I., Kretschmer H. Zur Soziologie und witterungsabhängigen Ausbildung von Zwergbinsen-Gesellschaften auf Ackerböden in Ostbrandenburg. Verh. Bot. Ver. Berl. Brandenbg. 2000, 133:119-144.
20. IUCN, 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2011.2.
21. Király, G. (Eds.) 2007. Red List of the Vascular Flora of Hungary (Private edition).
22. Király, G. (Eds.), 2009. New Hungarian Herbal. The Vascular Plants of Hungary. Identification key, Aggtelek National Park Directorate, Jósvafo.
23. Lukács B.A., Dévai Gy., Tóthmérész B. Aquatic macrophytes as bioindicators of water chemistry in nutrient rich backwaters along the Upper-Tisza River (in Hungary). Phytocoenologia 2009, 39:287-293.
24. Lukács B.A., Dévai Gy., Tóthmérész B. Small scale macrophyte-environment relationship in an oxbow-lake of the Upper-Tisza valley (Hungary). Comm. Ecol. 2011, 12:259-263.
25. Médail, F. 2004. Biodiversity and conservation issues. Plant species. In: Grillas, P., Gauthier, P., Yaverkovski, N., Perennou, C. (Eds.), Mediterranean Temporary Pools 1, Station biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles, 2004, pp. 18-24.
26. Meynell P.-J. Use of IUCN red listing process as a basis for assessing biodiversity threats and impacts in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2005, 23:65-72.
27. Moran P.A.P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomenon. Biometrika 1950, 37:17-23.
28. Nilsson A.N., Svensson B.W. Assemblages of dytiscid predators and culicid prey in relation of environmental factors in natural and clear-cut boreal swamp forest pools. Hydrobiologia 1995, 308:183-196.
29. Oertli B., Biggs J., Céréghino R., Grillas P., Joly P., Lachavanne J.-B. Conservation and monitoring of pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 2005, 15:535-540.
30. Pál, R., Pinke, Gy., Oláh, E., Csiky, J., Koltai, P., 2006. Untersuchung der Unkrautvegetation auf überstauten Ackerflächen in Süd-West Ungarn. J. Plant Dis. Prot. Spec. Issue XX, 567-576.
31. Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:289-290.
32. Pietsch W. Beitrag zur Gliederung der europäischen Zwergbinsengesellschaften (Isoëto-Nanojuncetea Br.-Bl. et Tx. 1943). Vegetatio 1973, 28:401-438.
33. Pinheiro, J., Douglas, B., Saikat, D., Deepayan, S., R Development Core Team 2012. NLME: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-104.
34. Pinto-Cruz C., Molina J.A., Barbour M., Silva V., Espírito-Santo M.D. Plant communities as a tool in temporary ponds conservation in SW Portugal. Hydrobiologia 2009, 634:11-24.
35. Pinto-Cruz C., Barbosa A.M., Molina J.A., Espírito-Santo M.D. Biotic and abiotic parameters that distinguish types of temporary ponds in a Portuguese Mediterranean ecosystem. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11:1658-1663.
36. Popiela A. Isoëto-Nanojuncetea species and plant communities in their eastern distribution range (Poland). Phytocoenologia 2005, 35:283-304.
37. Poschlod P. Underground floristics - keimfähige Diasporen im Boden als Beitrag zum floristischen Inventar einer Landschaft am Beispiel der Teichbodenflora. Natur Landschaft 1993, 68:155-159.
38. Poschlod P., Böhringer J., Fennel S., Prume C., Tiekötter A. Aspekte der Biologie und ökologie von Arten der Zwergbinsenfluren. Mitt. Bad. Landesver. Naturkd. Naturschutz Freib. i. Br. 1999, 17:219-260.
39. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.
40. Rhazi L., Grillas P., Toure A.M., Ham L.T. Impact of land use in catchment and human activities on water, sediment and vegetation of Mediterranean temporary pools. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. III 2001, 324:165-177.
41. Rhazi M., Grillas P., Charpentier A., Méedail F. Experimental management of Mediterranean temporary pools for conservation of the rare quillwort isoetes setacea. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 118:675-684.
42. Soó R. Tiszántúli flórakutatásaink újabb eredményei. Borbásia 1948, 8:48-57.
43. Rodrigues A.S.L., Pilgrim J.D., Lamoreux J.F., Hoffmann M., Brooks T.M. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:71-76.
44. Täuber T. Phänologische Daten als Hilfsmittel zur syntaxonomischen Differenzierung von Pionierbeständen-dargestellt am Beispiel von Zwergbinsen-Gesellschaften. Tuexenia 2000, 20:365-374.
45. Täuber, T. Petersen, J., 2000. Isoëto-nanojuncetea, Zwergbinsen-Gesellschaften. In: Dierschke, H. (Eds.): Synopsis der Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands, Heft 7. Göttingen.
46. ter Braak, C.J.F., Šmilauer, P., 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination Version 4.5. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA.
47. Thiere G., Milenkovski S., Lindgren P.-E., Sahlén G., Berglund O., Weisner S.E.B. Wetland creation in agricultural landscapes: biodiversity benefits on local and regional scales. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:964-973.
48. Timár L. Egyéves növénytársulások a Szeged környéki szikesek iszapján I. Ann. Biol. Univ. Hung. 1952, 2:311-321.
49. Timár L. Zonációtanulmányok szikes vizek partján. Bot. Közlem. 1957, 47:157-163.
50. Ubrizsy G. A rizs hazai gyomnövényzete. (La végétation des mauvaises herbes dans les cultures de riz en Hongrie). Acta Agrobot. Hung. 1948, 1:1-43.
51. Ubrizsy G. Unkrautvegetation der reiskulturen in Ungarn. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1961, 7:175-220.
52. Veech J.A., Summerville K.S., Crist T.O., Gering J.C. The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 2002, 99:3-9.
53. Williams P., Whitfield M., Biggs J., Bray S., Fox G., Nicolet P., Sear D. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 115:329-341.
54. Zacharias I., Zamparas M. Mediterranean temporary ponds. A disappearing ecosystem. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:3827-3834.