Active learning for relation type extension with local and global data views

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1105-1112

  Sun, Ang ^a,b   Grishman, Ralph ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Intelius Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

co testing; co training; distributional similarity; infactive learning; information extraction; inrelation extraction

Indexed keywords

CO-TESTING; CO-TRAINING; DISTRIBUTIONAL SIMILARITIES; INFACTIVE LEARNING; INFORMATION EXTRACTION;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SEMANTICS;

CHARACTER RECOGNITION;

EID: 84871102140     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2396761.2398409     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory.
2. Razvan C. Bunescu and Raymond J. Mooney. 2005. A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP.
3. Yee Seng Chan and Dan Roth. 2010. Exploiting background knowledge for relation extraction. In Proc. of COLING.
4. Michael Collins and Yoram Singer. 1999. Unsupervised Models for Named Entity Classification. In Proc. of EMNLP-99.
5. Jing Jiang. 2009. Multi-task transfer learning for weakly-supervised relation extraction. In Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP-09.
6. Jing Jiang and ChengXiang Zhai. 2007. A systematic exploration of the feature space for relation extraction. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL- 07.
7. Rosie Jones, Rayid Ghani, Tom Mitchell, Ellen Riloff. 2003. Active learning for information extraction with multiple view feature sets. In ECML 2003 Workshop on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining.
8. Nanda Kambhatla. 2004. Combining lexical, syntactic, and semantic features with maximum entropy models for information extraction. In Proceedings of ACL-04.
9. Zornista Kozareva and Eduard Hovy. 2010. Not all seeds are equal: Measuring the quality of text mining seeds. In NAACL-10.
10. Dekang Lin and Xiaoyun Wu. 2009. Phrase Clustering for Discriminative Learning. In Proc. of ACL-09.
11. Scott Miller, Jethran Guinness and Alex Zamanian. 2004. Name Tagging with Word Clusters and Discriminative Training. In Proc. of HLT-NAACL.
12. Ion Muslea, Steve Minton, and Craig Knoblock. 2000. Selective sampling with redundant views. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
13. Ang Sun and Ralph Grishman. 2010. Semi-supervised Semantic Pattern Discovery with Guidance from Unsupervised Pattern Clusters. In Proc. of COLING-10.
14. Ang Sun and Ralph Grishman. 2011. Semi-supervised Relation Extraction with Large-scale Word Clustering. In Proc. of ACL-11.
15. Vishnu Vyas, Patrick Pantel, Eric Crestan. 2009. Helping Editors Choose Better Seed Sets for Entity Set Expansion. In Proceedings of CIKM-09.
16. Dmitry Zelenko, Chinatsu Aone, and Anthony Richardella. 2003. Kernel methods for relation extraction. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1083-1106.
17. Min Zhang, Jie Zhang, Jian Su, and GuoDong Zhou. 2006. A composite kernel to extract relations between entities with both flat and structured features. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL-06.
18. Zhu Zhang. (2004). Weakly supervised relation classification for information extraction. In Proc. of CIKM'2004.
19. Shubin Zhao and Ralph Grishman. 2005. Extracting relations with integrated information using kernel methods. In Proceedings of ACL.
20. Guodong Zhou, Jian Su, Jie Zhang, and Min Zhang. 2005. Exploring various knowledge in relation extraction. In Proceedings of ACL-05.
21. Guodong Zhou, Min Zhang, DongHong Ji, and QiaoMing Zhu. 2007. Tree kernel-based relation extraction with context-sensitive structured parse tree information. In Proceedings of EMNLPCoNLL-07.