IT's evolving, they're changing, we're listening: Everybody's learning

ASCILITE 2008 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 809-818

  Robbie, Diane ^a   Zeeng, Lynette ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Critical analysis; Reflection; Web 2.0 technologies

Indexed keywords

BLENDED LEARNING; CASE STUDY APPROACH; CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT; CRITICAL ANALYSIS; DIGITAL AGE; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT; FIRST YEAR DESIGN; INNOVATIVE TEACHING; PARADIGM SHIFTS; PEER LEARNING; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; STUDENT EXPECTATIONS; STUDENT LEARNING; STUDENT MOTIVATION; STUDENT-CENTRED; TEACHER FEEDBACK; TEACHING PRACTICES; VIRTUAL LEARNING; WEB 2.0;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; REFLECTION; TEACHING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84871019565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Adams, M. K. (2008). Exploiting Social Networks to Teach the Art of Critique. The International Journal of the Arts in Society, 2(5), 67-72.
2. Anderson, T. (2005). Distance learning-social software's killer ap? Paper presented at the ODLAA Breaking Down Barriers Adelaide, South Australia.
3. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75.
4. Boud, D., Keough, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan Page.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
6. Carr-Gregg, M. (2007). Real wired Child: What parents need to know about their kids online. Australia: Penguin.
7. Conanan, D. M., & Pinkard, N. (2001). Students' Perceptions of Giving and Receiving Design Critiques in an Online Learning Environment. Paper presented at the Second European Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. from http://www.ll.unimaas.nl/euro-cscl/Papers/29.pdf.
8. Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 2(2006/11).
9. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2008). 7 Things you should know about Flickr [Electronic Version]. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Retrieved October 2008 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7034.pdf.
10. Frascara, J. (2007). Hiding lack of knowledge: Bad words in design education. Design Issues, 23(4), 62-68.
11. Friedman, K. (2004). Teaching students to teach themselves. Paper presented at the Norwegian School of Management: Pedagogical Development Seminar.
12. Jonassen, D. (2000). Learning as Activity. Paper presented at the Meaning of Learning Project, Learning Development Institute.
13. Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/kennedy.html
14. Leslie, S., & Landon, B. (2008). Social Software for Learning: What is it, why use it?
15. McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a Digital Lifestyle: The Role of Ubiquitous Mobile Technology in Supporting the Needs of Millennial Students. Paper presented at the EDUCAUSE AUSTRALASIA Conference: The Next Wave of Collaboration. http://www.educause.auckland.ac.nz/?15
16. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2002). Action Research: Principles and Practice (Second ed.). London: Routledge.
17. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (74), 5-12.
18. Moore, A., Moore, J., Fowler, S., & Tech, V. (2005). Faculty Development for the Net Generation: EDUCAUSE.
19. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0:Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software [Electronic Version]. Retrieved October 2008 from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
20. Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the Net Generation. from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf.
21. Poggenpohl, S. H., & Ahn, S.-S. (2002). Between Word and Deed:The 2000 ICOGRADA Design Education Manifesto Seoul, Korea Design Issues, 18(2), 46-56.
22. Ramaley, J., & Zia, L. (2005). The real versus the possible: Closing the gaps in engagement and learning: EDUCAUSE.
23. Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining Social Presence In Online Courses In Relation To Students' Perceived Learning And Satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
24. Robbie, D., & Zeeng, L. (2008). Engaging student social networks to motivate learning: Capturing, analysing and critiquing visual image. International Journal of Learning, 15.
25. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Archer, W., & Garrison, D. R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51-70.
26. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series.
27. Taylor, M.-J., & McCormack, C. (2006). Creative Critique in Visual Communication: Effective Feedback in Design Projects Through Voice-Centred Studio-Based Communication and Online Delivery. Paper presented at the Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Thinking the Future: Art, Design and Creativity Conference
28. The New Media Consortium, & EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2007). The 2007 Horizon Report [Electronic Version]. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2007_Horizon_Report.pdf.
29. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Wager, J. (2005). Support Services for the Net Generation: EDUCAUSE.