Small patients, big ethics

Anaesthesia

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 6-8

  Bailey, C R ^a   Yentis, S M ^a  

^a Anaesthesia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE; SEVOFLURANE;

BREATHING REFLEX; CHILD; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LARYNX MUCOSA; LARYNX SPASM; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNX; LIDOCAINE; MALE; REFLEX; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS;

EID: 84871006854     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12061     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg von BS, Keller K, et al. The effect of intravenous lidocaine on laryngeal and respiratory reflex responses in anaesthetised children. Anaesthesia 2012; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07295.x.
2. Durward A,. Research in children and ethical limits: the water laryngospasm challenge. Anaesthesia 2012; doi: 10.1111/anae.12005.
3. Erb TO, Frei FJ, Exploring laryngeal reflexes in anaesthetised children-the investigators' point of view. Anaesthesia 2012; doi: 10.1111/anae.12042.
4. Perruchoud AP,. Exploring laryngeal reflexes in anaesthetised children-the research ethics committee's point of view. Anaesthesia 2012; doi: 10.1111/anae.12043.
5. Dawson AJ, Yentis SM,. Contesting the science/ethics distinction in the review of clinical research. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007; 33: 165-7.
6. Jones MA,. Consent and other fairy tales. Medical Law Review 1999; 7: 103-34.