Seven interactional benefits of physical tasks for people with intellectual disability

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 311-321

  Antaki, Charles ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Intellectual disability; Interaction; Physical tasks

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84870989089     PISSN: 19349491     EISSN: 19349556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-50.4.311     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L., Walton, C., and Pate, L. (2008). Offering choice to people with an intellectual impairment: an interactional study. Journal of Intellectual Disability research, 52, 1165-1175.
2. Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L., & Walton, C. (2009). Choice for people with an intellectual impairment in official discourse and in practice. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 260-266.
3. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of joint understanding in the classroom. London, England: Methuen.
4. Finlay, W. M. L., & Antaki, C. (2012). How staff pursue questions to adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 361-370.
5. Finlay, W. M. L., Antaki, C., & Walton, C. (2008). Saying no to the staff'An analysis of refusals in a home for people with severe communication difficulties. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30, 55-75.
6. Gardner, H.,&Forrester, M. (Eds.). (2010). Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
7. Haddington, P. (2010). Turn-taking for turntaking: Mobility, time, and action in the sequential organization of junction negotiations in cars. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 372-400.
8. Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3, 181-199.
9. Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 401-426.
10. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Maynard, D. W., & Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational exams. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 177-202.
12. Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Antaki, C. (1998), Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of "being intellectually disabled."Disability and Society, 13, 807-827
13. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
14. Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 55-62.
15. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, volume 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Williams, V. (2010). Disability and discourse: Analysing inclusive conversation with people with intellectual disabilities. Chichester, England: Wiley/Blackwell.
18. Wootton, A. (1989). Speech to and from a severely retarded young Down's syndrome child. In M. Beveridge, G. Conti-Ramsden, & I. Leudar (Eds.), The language and communication of mentally handicapped people (pp. 157-184). London, England: Chapman-Hall.
19. Zinken, J., & Ogiermann, E. (2011). How to propose an action as objectively necessary. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44, 263-287.