The Attitudes, Perceptions and Concerns of Pedestrians and Vulnerable Road Users to Shared Space: A Case Study from the UK

Journal of Urban Design

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 78-97

  Hammond, Victoria ^a   Musselwhite, Charles ^b  

^a Herefordshire Council   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; ESTHETICS; PEDESTRIAN; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; PUBLIC SPACE; URBAN DESIGN;

ENGLAND; HEREFORD; HEREFORDSHIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84870987460     PISSN: 13574809     EISSN: 14699664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2012.739549     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams, J. 1995. Risk, London: Routledge.
2. Amey. 2010. Widemarsh Street, Hereford Kerb Design Review Report. Amey UK plc
3. Aronson, J. 1994. A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1) http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html
4. Atkin, R. 2010. Sight Line. Designing Better Streets for People with Low Vision, London: Helen Hamlyn Centre, Royal College of Art.
5. Avineri, E., Shinar, D. and Susilo, Y. O. 2012. Pedestrians' Behaviour in Cross Walks: The Effects of Fear of Falling and Age. Accidents Analysis and Prevention, 44(1): 30-4.
6. Barker, P. 2005. "Shared Space in the Public Realm, Policy Statement. Joint Committee on Mobility of Blind and Partially Sighted People.",http://www.jcmbps.org.uk/fileadmin/gdba/downloads/JCMBPS/JCMBPS_Shared_Space_October_2005.pdf
7. Bean, C., Kearns, R. and Collins, D. 2008. Exploring Social Mobilities: Narratives of Walking and Driving in Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Studies, 45(13): 2829-48.
8. Berlyne, D. E. 1960. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Berlyne, D. E. 1974. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, New York: Academic Press.
10. Broadbent, D. E. 1958. Effects of Noise on an Intellectual Task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30: 824-7.
11. CIHT (Chartered Institute of Highway Transportation). 2010. Manual for Streets 2: Wider Applications of the Principles
12. DfT (Department for Transport, UK). 2001. Older Drivers: A Literature Review
13. DfT (Department for Transport, UK). 2007. Manual for Streets
14. DfT (Department for Transport, UK). 2009. DfT Shared Space Project: Stage 1- Appraisal of Shared Space
15. Hamilton-Baillie, B. 2008. Towards Shared Space. Urban Design International, 13: 130-8.
16. Herefordshire Council. 2009. The State of Herefordshire Report 2009: Keys Findings from the 2009 State of Herefordshire Report, Herefordshire Council
17. Herefordshire Council. 2011. LGN Street Design Awards 2011: Widemarsh Street, Hereford Refurbishment Scheme Report, Herefordshire Council
18. Imrie, R., and M. Kumar. 2010. Shared Space and Sight Loss: Policies and Practices in English Local Authorities, Thomas Pilkington Trust. January 2010
19. Kaparias, I., M. G. H. Bell, A. Miri, S. Cheng, J. Greensted, and C. Taylor. 2010. "Modelling the Willingness of Pedestrians to Share Space with Vehicles." Paper presented at the UTSG Conference, Imperial College, London: 1-12
20. Keefe, J., Lam, D., Cheung, A., Dinh, T. and McCarty, C. 1998. Impact of Vision Impairment on Functioning. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology,: S1: S16-S18. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.1998.tb01360.x/abstract
21. Kent County Council. 2010. Ashford Shared Space Monitoring, Joint Transport Board. June 2010
22. Living Streets. 2009. Putting People at the Hearts of Your Improvements, London: Living Streets.
23. Milgram, S. 1970. The Experience of Living in Cities. Science, 167: 1461-8.
24. Moody, S. 2011. "How do Pedestrians Move in a Shared Space Scheme with High Traffic Flows? Is the Pedestrian Empowered or does a Perception of Risk give Rise to Anxiety and a Disincentive to Share the Street with Vehicles?." MSc Transport Planning diss
25. Moody, S., and S. Melia. in press. "Shared Space - Implications of Recent Research for Transport Policy." Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers - Transport
26. Musselwhite, C. 2011. Successfully Giving up Driving for Older People, Discussion paper London: International Longevity Centre-UK.
27. Musselwhite, C. B. A., Avineri, E., Fulcher, E. and Susilo, Y. O. 2010. Understanding Public Attitudes to Road-user Safety-Literature Review: Final Report, Road Safety Research Report No. 112 London: DfT.
28. MVA Consultancy. 2010a. Designing the Future: Shared Space: Operational Research, London: MVA Consultancy.
29. MVA Consultancy. 2010b. Designing the Future: Shared Space: Qualitative Research, London: MVA Consultancy.
30. Parkin, J. and Smithies, N. 2012. Accounting for the Needs of Blind and Visually Impaired People in Public Realm Design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1): 135-49.
31. Quimby, A., and J. Castle. 2006. A Review of Simplified Streetscape Schemes. Published Project Report PPR292. TRL
32. Reid, S., Kocak, N. and Hunt, L. 2009. DfT Shared Spaces Project-Stage 1: Appraisal of Shared Space, London: MVA Consultancy.
33. Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
34. Swinburne, G. 2006. Report of Road Safety on Kensington High Street. Report,http://www.hamilton-baillie.co.uk/_files/_projects/13-1.pdf
35. Thomas, C. 2008a. Discussion: Shared Space-Safe Space?. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers Municipal Engineer, 161(2): 59-60.
36. Thomas, C. 2008b. Guide Dogs Announces Results of Shared Surfaces Research. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers Municipal Engineer, 161(2): 77-9.