Condylar volume and condylar area in class I, class II and class III young adult subjects

Head and Face Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Saccucci, Matteo ^a   D'Attilio, Michele ^b   Rodolfino, Daria ^b   Festa, Felice ^b   Polimeni, Antonella ^a   Tecco, Simona ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

CBCT; Class I, class II and class III; Mandibular condyle; Volume

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CEPHALOMETRY; COHORT STUDIES; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCIDENCE; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84870955076     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1746160X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-8-34     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Katsavrias EG. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006, 129:470-478.
2. Krisjane Z, et al. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion. Stomatologija 2007, 9:67-71.
3. Krisjane Z, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients. Stomatologija 2009, 11:32-36.
4. Alexiou K, et al. Evolution of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2009, 38:141-147. 10.1259/dmfr/59263880, 19225084.
5. Ali AM, Sharawy M. Enlargement of the rabbit mandibular condyle after experimental induction of anterior disc displacement: a histomorphometric study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995, 53:544-560. 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90068-3, 7722724.
6. Chen J, et al. Altered functional loading causes differential effects in the subchondral bone and condylar cartilage in the temporomandibular joint from young mice. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009, 17:354-361. 10.1016/j.joca.2008.05.021, 2646810, 18789726.
7. White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Heal Phys 2008, 95:628-3637.
8. Berghan S, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. Tex Dent J 2012, 129:289-302.
9. Hussain AM, et al. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2008, 37:63-71. 10.1259/dmfr/16932758, 18239033.
10. Honey OB, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007, 132:429-438.
11. Schluetera B, et al. Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle. Angle Orthodontics 2008, 78:880-888.
12. van Vlijmen OJC, et al. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67:92-97.
13. Song WC. Female-to-male proportions of the head and face in Koreans. J Craniofac Surg 2009, 20:356-361. 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181843620, 19326486.
14. Gray RJ, et al. Condylar hyperplasia: correlation of histological and scintigraphic features. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1994, 23:103-107.
15. Ueki K, et al. Comparison of the stress direction on the TMJ in patients with class I, II, and III skeletal relationships. Orthodontic and Craniofacial Research 2008, 11:43-50.
16. Ogawa Y. Investigation of the relationship between the inclination of the condylar head and maxillofacial morphology. Journal of Fukuoka Dental College 1991, 18:137-153.
17. Widman DJ. Functional and morphologic considerations of the articular eminence. Angle Orthodontics 1988, 58:221-236.
18. Yamaki M, et al. The relationship between mandibular movement and dentofacial morphology: a preliminary report. Nihon Ago Kansetsu Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japanese Society for Temporomandibular Joint) 1990, 2:22-33.
19. Enomoto A, et al. Effects of mastication on mandibular growth evaluated by microcomputed tomography. Eur J Orthod 2010, 32:66-70. 10.1093/ejo/cjp060, 19648440.
20. Fangha J, Gedrange T. On the development, morphology and function of the temporomandibular joint in the light of the orofacial system. Ann Anat 2007, 189:314-319. 10.1016/j.aanat.2007.02.024, 17695983.
21. Saccucci M, et al. Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis. Head Face Med 2012, 8:15. 10.1186/1746-160X-8-15, 3484012, 22587445.
22. Willems NMBK, et al. Age-related changes in microarchitecture and mineralization of cancellous bone in the porcine mandibular condyle. J Struct Biol 2007, 158:421-427. 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.12.011, 17300959.
23. Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005, 128:337-346.
24. Periago DR, et al. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthodontics 2008, 78:387-395.