Effect of foulants on arsenic rejection via polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration (UF) membrane

Desalination

Volumn 309, Issue , 2013, Pages 243-246

  Agarwal, Gopal P ^a   Karan, Raj ^a   Bharti, Sachin ^a   Kumar, Hemant ^a   Jhunjhunwala, Sumit ^a   Sreekrishnan, T R ^a   Kharul, Ulhas ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b NATIONAL CHEMICAL LABORATORY   (India)

Author keywords

Arsenic rejection; Egg white; Humic acid; Ovalbumin; Polyacrylonitrile; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

EGG WHITE; FOULANTS; HUMIC ACID; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; OVALBUMINS; PAN MEMBRANES; ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; ORGANIC ACIDS; POLYACRYLONITRILES; PROTEINS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ARSENIC;

ARSENIC; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DISSOLUTION; FOULING; HUMIC ACID; MEMBRANE; PH; PROTEIN; ULTRAFILTRATION; POLYMER;

EID: 84870940877     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brandhuber P., Amy G. Alternative methods for membrane filtration of arsenic from drinking water. Desalination 1998, 117:1.
2. Brandhuber P., Amy G. Arsenic removal by a charged ultrafiltration membrane-influences of membrane operating conditions and water quality on arsenic rejection. Desalination 2001, 140:1.
3. US EPA Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water 2000, EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Standards and Risk Management Division, EPA 815-R-00-028.
4. Vrijenhoek E.M., Waypa J.J. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a loose nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2000, 130:265.
5. Kang M., Kawasaki M., Tamada S., Kamei T., Magara Y. Effect of pH on the removal of arsenic and antimony using reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2000, 131:293.
6. Amy G., Edwards M., Benjamin M., Carlson K., Chwirka J., Brandhuber P., McNeill L., Vagliasindi F. Arsenic Treatability Options and Evaluation of Residual Management Issues 1998, AWWARF.
7. Lohokare H.R., Muthu M.R., Agarwal G.P., Kharul U.K. Effective arsenic removal using polyacrylonitrile-based ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:159-166.
8. Kruger Nicholas J. The Bradford method for protein quantitation. The Protein Protocols Handbook 2002, 15-21.
9. Ravazzini A.M., Nieuwenhuijzen A.F., van der Graaf J.H.M.J. Direct ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: a comparison between filtration of raw sewage and primary clarifier effluent. Desalination 2005, 178:51-62.
10. Urase Taro, Oh Jeong-ik, Yamamoto Kazuo Effect of pH on rejection of different species of arsenic by nanofiltration. Desalination 1998, 117:11-18.
11. Van der Bruggen B., Manttari M., Nystrom M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
12. 2+ binding to calmodulin loop. Biophys. J. May 2006, 90:3043-3051.
13. Jones K.L., O'Melia C.R. Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects of pH and ionic strength. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165:31-46.
14. Yuan W., Zydney A.L. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 157:1-12.
15. Altundogan H.S., Altundogan S., Tumen F., Bildik M. Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on red mud. Waste Manage. 2000, 20:761.
16. Pattanayak J., Mondal K., Mathew S., Lalvani S.B. A parametric evaluation of the removal of As(V) and As(III) by carbon-based adsorbents. Carbon 2000, 38:589.