Innovative business models for smart cities: Overview of recent trends

Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 483-492

  Molinari, Francesco ^a  

^a Polymedia SpA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Business models; eGovernment; Future internet; Public service; Smart cities

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS MODELS; E-GOVERNMENT; FUTURE INTERNET; PUBLIC SERVICES; SMART CITIES;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INNOVATION; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WEB SERVICES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84870937525     PISSN: 20491034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Anderson, C. (2004) The Long Tail, [online], http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html.
2. Anderson, C. (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More, Hyperion.
3. Antiroikko, A. (2010) "Innovation in Democratic Governance: Benefiting from Web 2.0 Applications in the Public Sector". International Journal of Electronic Government Research Vol. 6, No. 2, pp 110-130.
4. AT Kearney (2010) A Viable Future Model for the Internet, [online], http://www.atkearney.com/index.php/Publications/a-viable-future-model-for-the-internet.html.
5. Boniface, M. (2011) Investigating How the Future Internet Amplifies Societal Trends, [online], http://www.seserv.org/fise-conversation/investigatinghowthefutureinternetamplifiessocietaltrends.
6. Caragliu A., Del Bo C. and Nijkamp P. (2009): "Smart cities in Europe". Research Memoranda 0048, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
7. Cave J. (2010) "The socio-economic impacts of the Future Internet", presentation delivered at ICT 2010, [online], http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/ict2010/item-display.cfm?id=3546.
8. Chatterjee K., Darnton A., Lyons G., Musselwhite C., Pilkington P., Rayner G., Tapp A., Owen E., Waygood D. and Wiltshire P. (2009) Individual behaviour change. Evidence in transport and public health, UK Department of Transport.
9. Chen Y.-C. (2010) "Citizen-Centric E-Government Services: Understanding Integrated Citizen Service Information Systems". Social Science Computer Review Vol. 28, No. 4, pp 427-442.
10. Damsgaard O., Lindqvist M., Roto J. and Sterling J. (2009) Territorial Potentials in the European Union, Nordregio.
11. Deloitte (2010) Study on user expectations of a life events approach for designing e-Government services, SMART 2009/0075, promoted by Unit H2 (ICT for Government and Public Services) of the Directorate General for Information Society and Media of the European Commission, Final Report, December.
12. DETECON (2009) ICT Development in New Urban Areas-Smart Cities, mimeo.
13. ECOTEC (2007) State of European Cities Report, European Commission, DG Regio.
14. European Commission (2007) Pre-commercial Procurement: Driving innovation to ensure sustainable high quality public services in Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2007) 799 final.
15. Figge S. (2009) Smart Cities, DETECON, [online], http://ikt.nrw.de/fileadmin/SITE_MASTER/content/Dokumente/Downloads/IKTNRWArchiv/2.RoundTableSmartCities/FiggeMehrLebensqualitatdurchSmartCities.pdf.
16. Gagnon Y.-C., Posada E., Bourgault M., Naud A. (2010) "Multichannel Delivery of Public Services: A New and Complex Management Challenge". International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp 213-222.
17. Gartner (2011) Hype Cycle for Smart City Technologies and Solutions, July. Governance International (2011) Co-Production Model, [online], http://www.govint.org/english/main-menu/ourservices/co-production.html.
18. Hassenzahl, M. (2003) "The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product". In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A.F. Monk, and P.C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, Kluwer, pp 31-42.
19. Iribarren M., Concha G., Valdes G., Solar M., Villarroel M.T., Gutierrez P. and Vasquez A. (2008) "Capability Maturity Framework for eGovernment: A Multi-dimensional Model and Assessing Tool". In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic Government (EGOV '08), Maria A. Wimmer, Hans J. Scholl, and Enrico Ferro (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 136-147.
20. ISA (Interoperabilty Solutions for European Public Administrations) Multimedia Assets Library (2011), [online], http://ec.europa.eu/isa/library/index_en.htm,[online].
21. ISO (2005) IWA 4. Quality management systems. Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2000 in local government. Ref. No. IWA 4:2005(E).
22. Klievink B. and Janssen M. (2008) "Improving Government service delivery with private sector intermediaries", European Journal of ePractice N° 5, October, [online], http://www.epractice.eu.
23. Misuraca G., Reid A. and Deakin M. (2011) Exploring emerging ICT-enabled governance models in European cities, JRC/IPTS Technical Note 65581.
24. OASIS (2011) Transformational Government Framework Primer Version 1.0, Committee Note Draft 01, [online], http://docs.oasis-open.org/tgf/TGF-Primer/v1.0/cnd01/TGF-Primer-v1.0-cnd01.docx.
25. Peedu G. (2011) Enhancing Public Service User Experience in Information Society, Master Thesis, University of Tallinn.
26. The PERIPHÈRIA Manifesto (2010), [online], http://www.peripheria.eu.
27. Punie Y., Misuraca G. and Osimo D. (Eds.) (2009) Public Services 2.0: The Impact of Social Computing on Public Services. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Commission, JRC/IPTS Technical Note 54203.
28. The Smart Cities project (2007), [online], http://www.smart-cities.eu.
29. Tapscott, D. (1997) The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence, McGraw-Hill.
30. Toth, A.G. (1992) "The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Maastricht Treaty". Common Market Law Review Vol. 29, pp 1079-1105.