NATO and energy security: From philosophy to implementation

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 388-395

  Rühle, Michael ^a  

^a NATO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

critical infrastructure protection; energy security; NATO; Russia; Strategic Concept

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870934694     PISSN: 14794012     EISSN: 17541018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14794012.2012.734673     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. See Jamie Shea, 'Energy Security: NATO's Potential Role', NATO Review, Autumn 2006
2. Thierry Legendre, 'The North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Future Role in Energy Security', The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Summer/Fall 2007, 29-35.
3. The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened'.
4. Riga Summit Declaration, NATO Press Release (2006) 150, 29 November 2006, Paragraph 45.
5. Bucharest Summit Declaration, NATO Press Release (2008) 049, 3 April 2008, Paragraph 48.
6. On the early phase of NATO's role in energy security see Phillip Cornell, Regional and International Energy Security Dynamics: Consequences for NATO's Search for an Energy Security Role, Geneva Paper No. 5 (Geneva Centre for Security Policy, 2012), 30-32.
7. See Michael Rühle, 'NATO and Energy Security. Toward a more Coherent Approach', Internationale Politik (Transatlantic Edition), May 2011.
8. See Johannes Varwick, 'NATO's Role in Energy Security', Internationale Politik (Transatlantic Edition), April 2008.
9. John R. Deni, 'Culture, Institutions, and Defense Cuts: Overcoming Challenges in Operational Energy Security', Journal of Transatlantic Studies 10, no. 4 (2012): 396-410.
10. See Anders Fogh Rasmussen (NATO Secretary General), 'NATO and Climate Change', Huffington Post, December 15, 2009, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anders-fogh-rasmussen/nato-and-climate-change_b_392409.html (accessed June 28, 2012).
11. See Jamie Shea, Keeping NATO Relevant, Carnegie Policy Outlook, April 2012, 7-8.