Is there an eGovernment paradox?

Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 90-98

  Castelnovo, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Efficiency; eGovernment; Government expenditures; Local government; Productivity paradox

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; E-GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE; HIGHER EFFICIENCY; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; POTENTIAL USERS; PRODUCTIVITY PARADOX; SHORT PERIODS; STILL MISSING; TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS;

EFFICIENCY; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; PRODUCTIVITY;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 84870924981     PISSN: 20491034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Abhijit, J. (2003), "Performance Paradox: Information Technology Investments and Administrative Performance in the Case of the 50 U.S. State Governments", ICIS 2003 Proceedings. Online: http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2003/33
2. Booz-Allen-Hamilton (2005) Beyond eGovernment", Booz Allen Hamilton. Online: http://egov.sonasi.com/repository/beyond-eGovernment201d/download
3. Bresnahan, T.F., Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (2002),"Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1, pp. 339-376.
4. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993), "The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology", Communications of the ACM, 36, pp. 67-77.
5. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. (1998), "Beyond the Productivity Paradox: Computers are the Catalyst for Bigger Changes", Communications of the ACM, 41, pp. 49-55.
6. CNIPA (2007), Monitoraggio dei progetti di EGovernment - Fase 1. Rapporto finale. Online: http://www.cnipa.gov.it/site/_files/EG000_RP05_0007_V1_RapportoSintesiConclusivo.pdf
7. Codagnone, C. and Undheim, T.A. (2008), Benchmarking eGovernment: tools, theory, and practice, European Journal of ePractice, 4, Online: www.epracticejournal.eu.
8. Estache, A., Gonzalez, M. and Trujillo, L. (2007), "Government Expenditures on Education, Health and Infrastructure. A Naïve Look at levels, outcomes and efficiency", World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4219.
9. (EU 2006), i2010 eGovernment Action Plan: Accelerating eGovernment in Europe for the Benefit of All, SEC(2006) 511.
10. (EU 2009), Making public support for innovation in the EU more effective: Lessons learned from a public consultation for action at Community level - SEC(2009) 1197.
11. Foley, P., Alfonso, X., (2009), "eGovernment and The Transformation Agenda", Public Administration, 87, 2, pp. 371-396.
12. Gunnarsson, G., Mellander, E. and Savvidou, E. (2004), Human capital is the key to the IT productivity paradox, Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU), WORKING PAPER 13.
13. IDABC (2005), The impact of eGovernment on competitiveness, growth and jobs, IDABC eGovernment Observatory - Background Research Paper
14. ISTAT (2009), Conti delle Amministrazioni pubbliche per sottosettore. Online: http://www.istat.it/dati/dataset/20090617_00/
15. Mandl, U., Dierx, A. and Ilzkovitz, F. (2008), The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Public Spending Economic Papers, 301. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication_summary11904_en.htm
16. NOIE (2003), EGovernment Benefits Study, National Office for the Information Economy, Australia. Online: http://www.agimo.gov.au/archive/__data/assets/file/0012/16032/benefits.pdf
17. Promo P.A. (2009), La soddisfazione delle piccole e microimprese nei confronti della pubblica amministrazione - Terzo Rapporto Nazionale 2008. Online: http://www.iss.promopa.it/admin/uploads/file/outlook%202008.pdf
18. Unioncamere(2009), Unioncamere: la burocrazia costa 1.000 euro al mese alle imprese. Online: http://archidata.typepad.com/files/unioncamere_com_costipubblicaamministrazione_x_imprese09.doc