Sample selection for the National Children's Study: Form must follow function

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 31-33

  Savitz, David A ^a,b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD CARE; CHILD HEALTH; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE;

CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; PEDIATRICS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLING STUDIES;

EID: 84870923015     PISSN: 02695022     EISSN: 13653016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12021     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Belanger K, Buka S, Cherry DC, Dudley DJ, Elliott MR, Hale DE, et al,. Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2012 Sept 27 [Epub ahead of print].
2. Olsen J,. Random sampling-is it worth it? Commentary to Belanger et al. Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. In press.
3. Savitz DA, Ness RB,. Saving the National Children's Study. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 598-601.