Fun and feedback at the press of a button

ASCILITE 2006 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 695-705

  Richards, Debbie ^a   Braiding, Catherine ^a   Vaughan, Alan ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Computerised audience response systems (CARS); Feedback; Keypad based technology; Personal response system; Socratic learning

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC RESPONSE; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; LEARNING OUTCOME; LEARNING PROCESS; PERSONAL RESPONSE SYSTEMS; RESPONSE SYSTEMS; SOCRATIC LEARNING; STUDENT EVALUATION;

FEEDBACK; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84870922186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. th Int. l W'shop "New Trends in Physics Teaching", Puebla, Mexico, May 27-30.
2. Banks, D. (2003). Using KEEpad-based group process support systems to facilitate student reflection. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker and J. Baron (Eds), Proc. of ascilite'03, Adelaide, SA, 37-46. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide03/docs/pdf/37.pdf
3. Butler, M. & Butler, F. (2006). Introduction to Personal Response Systems and Studies of their Use, Proc. Education and Technology, ACTA Press.
4. Draper, S.W., Cargill, J., & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 13-23.
5. Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Mestre, J.P., & Leonard, W.J. (2000). "ASK•IT/A2L: Assessing student knowledge with instructional technology. UMPERG 2000-09-SEP, 1-28. http://umperg.physics.umass. edu/library/UMPERG-2000-09/entirePaper/
6. Hake, R.R. (1999). Search, Development, And Change In Undergraduate Biology Education (Redcube): A Web Guide For Non-Biologists. Physics Department, Indiana University (Emeritus). http://physics.indiana.edu/~redcube/redcube.pdf
7. Laundauer, D. (1995) The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability, and productivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Russell, G. and Pitt, I. (2004). Visions of a Wireless Future in Education Technology. In Proceedings InSITE'2004, http://proceedings.informingscience.org/ InSITE2004/101russe.pdf
9. Sokoloff, D.R. & Thornton, R.K. (1997). Using Interactive Lecture Demonstrations to Create an Active Learning Environment. The Physics Teacher, 35, 340-346.
10. Su, Q. (2002). Teaching innovation using a computerised audience response system. http://www.cs.uq.edu.au/~aupec/aupec02/Final-Papers/Q-SU1.pdf
11. Tsvetinov, P., Abercrombie. D. & Do, H. (2005). Individual versus group reasoning: A comparison study using a keypad support system. ascilite'05 poster, http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/ brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/P9_Tsvetinov.pdf
12. Williams, J, (2003). Learning by remote-control: exploring the use of an audience response system as a vehicle for content delivery. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker and J. Baron (Eds). Proc. of ascilite'03, Adelaide, SA, 739-742.