Through the eyes of the student: What college students look for, find, and think about sexual health resources on campus

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 306-316

  Eisenberg, Marla E ^a   Garcia, Carolyn M ^b   Frerich, Ellen A ^a,b   Lechner, Kate E ^a   Lust, Katherine A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

College students; Health services; Qualitative methods; Sexual health; Young adults

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870917163     PISSN: 18689884     EISSN: 15536610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13178-012-0087-0     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American College Health Association. (2010). American College Health Association -National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2010. Linthicum: American College Health Association.
2. Blake, S. M., Ledsky, R., Goodenow, C., Sawyer, R., Lohrmann, D., & Windsor, R. (2003). Condom availability programs in Massachusetts high schools: Relationships with condom use and sexual behavior. American Journal of Public Health, 93(6), 955-962. (Pubitemid 38480229)
3. Boynton Health Service. (2008). 2007 Campus tobacco policy report. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
4. Boynton Health Service. (2009). College student health survey report, Minnesota post-secondary students. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come take a walk with me: The "go-along" interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place, 15, 263-272.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance: Tables in the National Profile. Table 10.
8. Chlamydia -Reported Cases and Rates per 100,000 Population by Age Group and Sex, United States, 2005-2009. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/std/ stats09/tables.htm.
9. Cockerham, W. C. (2005a). Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1), 51-67. (Pubitemid 41503892)
10. Cockerham, W. C. (2005b). Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1), 51-67. (Pubitemid 41503892)
11. Cummins, S., Curtis, S., Diez-Roux, A. V., & Macintyre, S. (2007). Understanding and representing 'place' in health research: A relational approach. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1825-1838. (Pubitemid 47503503)
12. Eaton, D. K., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., & Wechsler, H. (2010). Youth risk behavior surveillance, United States, 2009. MMWR, 59(SS-5), 1-142.
13. Eisenberg, M. E. (2002). The association of campus resources for gay, lesbian, and bisexual students with college students' condom use. Journal of American College Health, 51(3), 109-116. (Pubitemid 41566011)
14. Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Casual sex and emotional health in sexually active young adults: Are "friends with benefits" psychologically damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41 (4), 231-237.
15. Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 90-96. (Pubitemid 43882311)
16. Frohlich, K. L., & Potvin, L. (2008). The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 216-221.
17. Frohlich, K. L., Bodnarchuk, J. L., Chateau, D., Roos, L., & Forsyth, S. (2007). What you see is what you get? Questioning the relationship between objective and subjective appraisals of neighbourhood resources in relation to health. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 98(4), 292-6.
18. Garcia C., Eisenberg M. E., Frerich E. A., Lechner K.E., & Lust K. A. (in press). Conducting go-along interviews to understand context and promote health. Qualitative Health Research.
19. Guttmacher, S., Lieberman, L., Ward, D., Freudenberg, N., Radosh, A., & Des Jarlais, D. (1997). Condom availability in New York City public high schools: Relationships to condom use and sexual behavior. American Journal of Public Health, 87(9), 1427-1433. (Pubitemid 27414997)
20. Hamilton, S. F., & Hamilton, M. A. (2006). School, work, and emerging adulthood. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Kirby, D., Brener, N. D., Brown, N. L., Peterfreund, N., Hillard, P., & Harrist, R. (1999). The impact of condom distribution in Seattle schools on sexual behavior and condom use. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 182-187. (Pubitemid 29282794)
22. Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455-485.
23. Leibowitz B. Northwestern Sex Toy Demo: Univ. kids get explicit lesson in human sexuality. Retrieved from www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083-162-20038506- 504083.html 3 March 2011.
24. McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351-377.
25. MinnesotaDepartment ofHealth. (2010). 2010 Minnesota sexually transmitted disease statistics. Retrieved from www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/dtopics/ stds/stats/stdreport2010.pdf.
26. Mosher, W. D., Chandra, A., & Jones, J. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women 15-44 years of age. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Center for Disease Control and Prevention: National Center for Health Statistics.
27. Muhr, T. (2010). ATLAS.ti GmbH v. 6.2 [computer software]. Berlin: ATLAS.ti.
28. National Center for Education Statistics. (2009) Table 1. Enrollment at Title IV institutions, by control and level of institution, student level, attendance status, gender, and race/ethnicity: United States, fall 2009. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/tables-library.
29. National Center for Health Statistics. (2009). Health, United States, 2008, with Chartbook. Hyattsville, MD: 2009.
30. Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd.
31. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE Publications.
32. Sallis, J., Owen, N. (2002). Ecological models of health behavior. In: KG, BK R, FM L, (Ed.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 3rd ed. (pp462-484) San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
33. Schuster, M. A., et al. (1997). Students' acquisition and use of school condoms in a high school condom availability program. Pediatrics, 100(4), 689-694. (Pubitemid 27425995)
34. Schuster, M. A., Bell, R. M., Berry, S. H., & Kanouse, D. E. (1998). Impact of a high school condom availability program on sexual attitudes and behaviors. Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 67-72,88. (Pubitemid 28216338)
35. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36. Trojan Brand Condoms (2006). New survey points to disparity of access to information about sexual health of college campuses. Trojan Brand Condoms. Retrieved from http://www.trojancondoms.com/