Earthquake behavior of berke arch dam using ambient vibration test results

Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 780-792

  Sevim, Bariş ^a   Altunişik, Ahmet Can ^b   Bayraktar, Alemdar ^b  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Ambient vibration testing; Berke Arch Dam; Dynamic characteristics; Earthquake behavior; Finite element modeling; Model calibration

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT VIBRATION TEST; AMBIENT VIBRATIONS; ANALYTICAL DYNAMICS; CALIBRATED MODEL; CREST LENGTH; DAM HEIGHT; DAMPING RATIO; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; EXPERIMENTAL DYNAMICS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELING; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; FINITE-ELEMENT PROGRAMS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION; LAGRANGIAN APPROACHES; MODE SHAPES; MODEL CALIBRATION; RESERVOIR WATER; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODEL;

ACCELEROMETERS; ARCH DAMS; CALIBRATION; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; EARTHQUAKES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84870913671     PISSN: 08873828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000264     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akkas, N., Akay, H. U., and, YIlmaz, C. (1979). Applicability of general purpose finite element programs in solid-fluid interaction problems. Comput. Struct., 10 (5), 773-783. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(79)90041-5
2. Akköse, M. (2004). Materially linear and nonlinear dynamic analyses of arch dam-water-foundation systems by Lagrangian approach. Ph.D. thesis, Karadeniz Technical Univ., Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish).
3. Akköse, M., Bayraktar, A., and, Dumanoǧlu, A. A. (2008). Reservoir water level effects on nonlinear dynamic response of arch dams. J. Fluids Struct., 24 (3), 418-435. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.08.007
4. Allemang, R. J. (2003). The modal assurance criterion: Twenty years of use and abuse. Sound Vibrat., 37 (8), 14-23.
5. Alves, S. W., and, Hall, J. F. (2006). Generation of spatially nonuniform ground motion for nonlinear analysis of a concrete arch dam. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35 (11), 1339-1357. doi:10.1002/eqe.576
6. Ansys 10.0 [Computer software]. Canonsburg, PA, Ansys.
7. Bathe, K. J. (1996). Finite element procedures in engineering analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B., Akkose, M., and, Calayir, C. (2008). Seismic damage assessment of arch dam reservoir-foundation system using demand capacity ratios. Dam Eng., 18 (3), 195-216.
9. Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B., AltunIşIk, A. C., and, Akköse, M. (2007). Comparison of nonlinear seismic behavior of arch dams to near-fault strong ground motion using Westergaard and Lagrangian approaches. Int. Symp. Adv. Earthquake Struct. Eng., Advances Earthquake Structural Engineering (AESE), Isparta-Antalya, Turkey, 393-405.
10. Bendat, J. S., and, Piersol, A. G. (2004). Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures, Wiley, New York.
11. Brincker, R., Zhang, L., and, Andersen, P. (2000). Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. Proc., 18th Int. Modal Analys. Conf., Vol. 4062, New York, 625-630.
12. CalayIr, Y. (1994). Dynamic analysis of concrete gravity dams using the Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches. Ph.D. thesis, Karadeniz Technical Univ., Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish).
13. Chopra, A. K. (2009). Earthquake analysis of arch dams. Sakarya Int. Symp. Earthquake Eng., Sakarya Univ., Sakarya, Turkey.
14. Clough, R. W., and, Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of structures, McGraw Hill, Singapore.
15. Daniell, W. E., and, Taylor, C. A. (1999). Effective ambient vibration testing for validating numerical models of concrete dams. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28 (11), 1327-1344. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28: 11<1327::AID-EQE869>3.0.CO;2-V
16. Darbre, G. R., De Smet, C. A. M., and, Kraemer, C. (2000). Natural frequencies measured from ambient vibration response of the Arch Dam of Mauvoisin. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29 (5), 577-586. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1096-9845(200005)29:5<577::AID-EQE924>3.0.CO;2-P
17. Darbre, G. R., and, Proulx, J. (2002). Continuous ambient-vibration monitoring of the Arch Dam of Mauvoisin. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31 (2), 475-480. doi:10.1002/eqe.118
18. Espandar, R., and, Lotfi, V. (2003). Comparison of non-orthogonal smeared crack and plasticity models for dynamic analysis of concrete arch dams. Comput. Struct., 81 (14), 1461-1474. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00083-X
19. Ewins, D. J. (1984). Modal testing: Theory and practice, Research Studies Press, New York.
20. Fok, K. L., and, Chopra, A. K. (1986). Earthquake analysis of arch dams including dam-water interaction, reservoir boundary absorption and foundation flexibility. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 14 (2), 155-184. doi:10.1002/eqe. 4290140202
21. Ghanaat, Y. (2002). Seismic performance and damage criteria for concrete dams. Proc., 3rd U.S.-Japan Workshop Adv. Res. Earthquake Eng. Dams, San Diego.
22. Ghanaat, Y., Clough, R. W., and, Redpath, B. B. (1992). Experimental study of dam-water-foundation interaction. Proc., 10th World Conf. Earthquake Eng., Madrid, Spain.
23. Greeves, E. J. (1990). The investigation and calibration of a novel Lagrangian fluid finite element with particular reference to dynamic fluid-structure interaction. Rep. No. UBCE-EE-90-05, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
24. Imregun, M., Visser, W. J., and, Ewins, D. J. (1995). Finite element model updating using frequency response function data I: Theory and initial investigation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 9 (2), 187-202. doi:10.1006/mssp. 1995.0015
25. Jacobsen, N. J., Andersen, P., and, Brincker, R. (2006). Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis. Proc., ISMA 2006: Int. Conf. Noise Vibrat. Eng., Katholieke Univ., Leuven, Belgium.
26. Jaishi, B., and, Ren, W. X. (2005). Structural finite element model updating using ambient vibration test results. J. Struct. Eng., 131 (4), 617-628. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(617)
27. Larsson, P. O., and, Sas, P. (1992). Model updating based on forced vibration testing using numerically stable formulations. Proc., 10th Int. Modal Analys. Conf., Vol. 2, San Diego, 966-974.
28. Lord, J. F., Ventura, C. E., and, Dascotte, E. (2004). Automated model updating using ambient vibration data from a 48-storey building in Vancouver. Proc., 22nd Int. Modal Analys. Conf., Dearborn, Detroit, 26-29.
29. Lotfi, V., and, Espandar, R. (2004). Seismic analysis of concrete arch dams by combined discrete crack and non-orthogonal smeared crack technique. Eng. Struct., 26 (1), 27-37. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.007
30. Modak, S. V., Kundra, T. K., and, Nakra, B. C. (2002). Comparative study of model updating methods using experimental data. Comput. Struct., 80 (5-6), 437-447. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00017-2
31. Nasserzare, J., Leib, Y., and, Eskandari-Shiria, S. (2000). Computation of natural frequencies and mode shapes of arch dams as an inverse problem. Adv. Eng. Softw., 31 (11), 827-836. doi:10.1016/S0965-9978(00)00045-4
32. Operational Modal Analysis 4.0 (OMA) [Computer software]. Denmark, Structural Vibration Solution A/S.
33. Porter, C. S., and, Chopra, A. K. (1982). Hydrodynamic effects in dynamic response of simple arch dams. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10 (3), 417-431.
34. Proulx, J., Paultre, P., Rheault, J., and, Robert, Y. (2001). An experimental investigation of water level effects on the dynamic behavior of a large arch dam. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30 (8), 1147-1166. doi:10.1002/eqe.55
35. PULSE, Release 11.2 [Computer software]. Nærum, Denmark, Bruel & Kjaer Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S.
36. Shahkarami, A., Delforouzi, M., and, Salarirad, H. (2004). Study of the compression and tension factors of safety with a 3D FE model for an arch dam and rock foundation: A case study of the Karun zIII Arch Dam in Iran. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41 (3), 623-628.
37. Szczesiak, T., Weber, B., and, Bachmann, H. (1999). Non-uniform earthquake input for arch dam-foundation interaction. Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 18 (7), 487-493. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00021-4
38. Strong ground motion database of Turkey. © http://angora.deprem.gov. tr/ftpt.htm (May 20, 2009).
39. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2003). Time-history dynamic analysis of concrete hydraulic structures, Rep. No. EM 1110-2-6051, Washington, DC.
40. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1994). Arch dam design, Engineering and Design.
41. Westergaard, H. M. (1933). Water pressures on dams during earthquakes. Transactions, 98 (1835), 418-433.
42. Wilson, E. L., and, Khalvati, M. (1983). Finite elements for the dynamic analysis of fluid-solid systems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 19 (11), 1657-1668. doi:10.1002/nme.1620191105
43. Wu, J. R., and, Li, Q. S. (2004). Finite element model updating for a high-rise structure based on ambient vibration measurements. Eng. Struct., 26 (7), 979-990. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.002
44. Zienkiewicz, O. C., and, Taylor, R. L. (1989). The finite element method, Vol. I, McGraw Hill, London.
45. Zivanovic, S., Pavic, A., and, Reynolds, P. (2007). Finite element modelling and updating of a lively footbridge: The complete process. J. Sound Vibrat., 301 (1-2), 126-145. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2006.09.024