Conversion of cardiovascular conference abstracts to publications

Circulation

Volumn 126, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 2819-2825

  Fosbøl, Emil L ^a   Fosbøl, Philip L ^b   Harrington, Robert A ^a   Eapen, Zubin J ^a   Peterson, Eric D ^a  

^a DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cardiology; Knowledge; Publications; Publishing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AUTOMATION; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; ALGORITHMS; CARDIOLOGY; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LOGISTIC MODELS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84870903061     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120535     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Byerly WG, Rheney CC, Connelly JF, Verzino KC. Publication rates of abstracts from two pharmacy meetings. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34: 1123-1127.
2. Goldman L, Loscalzo A. Fate of cardiology research originally published in abstract form. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:255-259.
3. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;272: 158-162.
4. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007: MR000005.
5. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14:iii, ix-xi,1-193.
6. Green M. Are international medical conferences an outdated luxury the planet can't afford? Yes. BMJ. 2008;336:1466.
7. Ioannidis JP. Are medical conferences useful? And for whom? JAMA. 2012;307:1257-1258.
8. Circulation archives. Circulation Web site. http://circ.ahajournals.org/ content/by/year. Accessed March 29, 2012.
9. JACC archives. Journal of the American College of Cardiology Web site. http://content.onlinejacc.org/archive/. Accessed March 29, 2012.
10. European Heart Journal archives. European Heart Journal Web site. http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/by/year. Accessed March 29, 2012.
11. ISI Web of Knowledge. Web of Knowledge Web site. http://apps. webofknowledge.com/WOS-GeneralSearch-input.do?highlighted-tab=WOS&product= WOS&last-prod=WOS&SID=4EG7gB3GNMLo5KHh1cat&search-mode= GeneralSearchFirst. Accessed September 20, 2011.
12. Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM, Hong Y, Grant AO, Daniels SR, Hachinski VC, Gibbons RJ, Gardner TJ, Krumholz HM. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA. 2006;295:1675-1680.
13. Abstracts selected for ESC 2008 30 August-3 September 2008, Munich-Germany. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:iii-vi.
14. von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramér MR. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:12.
15. Lyman S. Industry access to the literature. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29: 571-572.
16. Gitlin JM. Do we need an alternative to peer-reviewed journals? ARS Technica Web site. http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/07/do-we-need-an- alternative-to-peer-reviewed-journals.ars. Accessed October 2011.
17. Lin T. Cracking open the scientific process. The New York Times Web site. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal- tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?-r=1&scp=5&sq= alzheimers%20blog%20collaboration&st=cse. Accessed March 21, 2012.
18. Evans JA, Foster JG. Metaknowledge. Science. 2011;331:721-725.
19. Jones BF, Wuchty S, Uzzi B. Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science. 2008;322: 1259-1262.
20. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 2007;316:1036-1039.