Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: A simulation study

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-10

  Hely, F S ^a   Amer, P R ^a   Walker, S P ^b   Symonds, J E ^b  

^a ABACUSBIO LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

aquaculture; breeding programme; inbreeding; simulation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; AQUACULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOTYPE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; AQUACULTURE; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84870892613     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001371     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Belonsky GM and Kennedy BW 1988. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd. Journal of Animal Science 66, 1124-1131.
2. Bentsen HB and Olesen I 2002. Designing aquaculture mass selection programs to avoid high inbreeding rates. Aquaculture 204, 349-359. (Pubitemid 34134725)
3. Berg P and Henryon M 1998. A comparison of mating designs for inference on genetic parameters in fish. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied Livestock Production, vol. 27, Armidale, Australia, pp. 115-118.
4. Blonk RJ, Komen J and van Arendonk JAM2010. Minimizing genotyping in breeding programs with natural mating. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, CD Rom Paper Number 0190.
5. Brown RC, Woolliams JA and McAndrew BJ 2005. Factors influencing effective population size in commercial populations of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata. Aquaculture 247, 219-225. (Pubitemid 40743173)
6. Caballero A, Santiago E and Toro MA 1996. Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Animal Science 62, 431-442.
7. Cécile M, Blonk R, Komen H, de Koning DJ, Haley C, van Arendonk J and Bovenhuis H 2010. Comparison of selection methods for natural mating massspawning species. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, CD Rom Paper Number 0717.
8. Coman GJ and Henshall JM 2010. Maintaining diversity and restricting inbreeding by optimized mating allocation for the giant tiger shrimp. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, CD Rom Paper Number 0945.
9. Doyle RW and Herbinger CM 1994. The use of DNA fingerprinting for high-intensity within-family selection in fish breeding. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, vol. 19, Guelph, ON, Canada, pp. 364-371.
10. Dupont-Nivet M, Haffray P and Vandeputte M 2010. Effect of culling on bias of BLUP estimates - case of fish species. Proceedings of the 9thWorld Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, CD Rom Paper Number 0429.
11. Dupont-Nivet M, Vandeputte M, Haffray P and Chevassus B 2006. Effect of different mating designs in inbreeding, genetic variance and response to selection when applying individual selection in fish breeding programs. Aquaculture 252, 161-170. (Pubitemid 43220193)
12. Falconer DS and Mackay TFC 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. Longman House, Essex, UK.
13. Fauvel C, Suquet M, Severe A, Mylonas CC and Papandroulakis N 2008. Slowrelease GnRHa treatment prevented atresia during vitellogenesis and induced ovulation of captive wreckfish (Polyprion americanus). Cybium 32 (2 suppl.), 191.
14. Gallardo JA, Lhorente JP and Neira R 2010. The consequences of including nonadditive effects on the genetic evaluations of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Genetics Selection Evolution 42, 19.
15. Garber AF, Tosh JJ, Fordham SE, Hubert S, Simpson G, Symonds JE, Robinson JAB, Bowman S and Trippel EA 2010. Survival and growth traits at harvest of communally reared families of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Aquaculture 307, 12-19.
16. Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ and Thompson R 1999. ASREML reference manual. NSW Agriculture Bulletin No. 3.
17. Gjerdrem T and Baranski M 2009. Selective breeding in aquaculture: an introduction, 1st edition. Springer, London, UK.
18. Gjerde B, Gjøen HM and Villanueva B 1996. Optimum designs for fish breeding programmes with constrained inbreeding Mass selection for a normally distributed trait. Livestock Production Science 47, 59-72.
19. Henderson CR 1984. Applications of linear models in animal breeding, 2nd edition. University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
20. Herbinger CM, Doyle RW, Pitman ER, Paquet D, Mesa KA, Morris DB, Wright JM and Cook D 1995. DNA fingerprint based analysis of paternal and maternal effects on offspring growth and survival in communally reared rainbow trout. Aquaculture 137, 245-256.
21. Hill WG 2000. Maintenance of quantitative genetic variation in animal breeding programmes. Livestock Production Science 63, 99-109. (Pubitemid 30231200)
22. Kinghorn BP 2011. An algorithm for efficient constrained mate selection. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 4.
23. Leitch HW, Smith C, Burnside EB and Quinton M 1994. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 1702-1718.
24. Masuma S, Takebe T and Sakakura Y 2010. A review of the broodstock management and larviculture of the Pacific northern bluefin tuna in Japan. Aquaculture 315, 2-8.
25. Meuwissen THE 1997. Maximising the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75, 934-940. (Pubitemid 127441682)
26. Meuwissen THE and Luo Z 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 24, 305-313. (Pubitemid 24407283)
27. Pong-Wong R and Woolliams JA 2007. Optimisation of contribution of candidate parents to maximise genetic gain and restricting inbreeding using semidefinite programming. Genetics Selection Evolution 39, 3-25. (Pubitemid 46103348)
28. Refstie T and Steine TA 1978. Selection experiments with salmon: III. Genetic and environmental sources of variation in length and weight of Atlantic salmon in the freshwater phase. Aquaculture 14, 221-234.
29. Robertson A 1961. Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genetics Research 2, 189-194.
30. Skaarud A, Woolliams JA and Gjøen HM 2011. Strategies for controlling inbreeding in fish breeding programs; an applied approach using optimum contribution (OC) procedures. Aquaculture 311, 110-114.
31. Sonesson AK and Meuwissen THE 2000. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genetics Selection Evolution 32, 231-248. (Pubitemid 30415974)
32. Toro MA, Nieto B and Salgado C 1988. A note on minimization of inbreeding in small-scale selection programmes. Livestock Production Science 20, 317-323.
33. Villanueva B, Woolliams JA and Simm G 1994. Strategies for controlling rates of inbreeding in MOET nucleus schemes for beef cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 26, 517-535.
34. Winkelman AM and Peterson RG 1994. Heritabilities, dominance variation, common environmental effects and genotype by environment interactions for weight and length in chinook salmon. Aquaculture 125, 17-30. (Pubitemid 2138094)
35. Wray NR and Simm G 1990. The use of embryo transfer to accelerate genetic improvement in beef cattle. Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, vol. 15, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 315-318.
36. Wright S 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56, 330-338.