Improving international research with clinical specimens: 5 achievable objectives

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 5592-5601

  Labaer, Joshua ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

biobank; blood; calibration; case control; clinical; cohort; database; disease; diversity; donors; ethics; governance; healthcare; inclusion; informed consent; proteomics; public partnership; reference standard; sample processing; specimen; standard operating procedure; standardization; tissue; translational

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; HUMAN; ISOLATION PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SAMPLE; STANDARDIZATION; STORAGE; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CALIBRATION; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; PROTEOMICS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SOFTWARE; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84870889596     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: 15353907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr300796m     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Burdall, S. E.; Hanby, A. M.; Lansdown, M. R.; Speirs, V. Breast cancer cell lines: friend or foe? Breast Cancer Res. 2003, 5 (2) 89-95
2. Glenn, G. C.; Hathaway, T. K. Effects of specimen evaporation on quality control Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1976, 66 (4) 645-52
3. Calam, R. R. Reviewing importance of specimen collection J. Am. Med. Technol. 1977, 39 (6) 297-302
4. Marko-Varga, G.; Végvári, Á.; Welinder, C.; Lindberg, H.; Rezeli, M.; Edula, G.; Svensson, K. J.; Belting, M.; Laurell, T.; Fehniger, T. E. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 10.1021/pr300185k
5. Vaught, J. Research & Policy Initiatives in NCI's Office of Biorepositories & Biospecimen Research Translational Research Interest Group; http://sigs.nih.gov/trig/Documents/TRIG-091210-Vaught.pdf (accessed Aug 3, 2012).
6. Blow, N. Biobanking: freezer burn Nat. Methods 2009, 6 (2) 173-178
7. Saha, K.; Hurlbut, J. B. Research ethics: Treat donors as partners in biobank research Nature 2011, 478 (7369) 312-313
8. Kaufman, D. J.; Murphy-Bollinger, J.; Scott, J.; Hudson, K. L. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85 (5) 643-54
9. Forsberg, J. S.; Hansson, M. G.; Eriksson, S. Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 17 (12) 1544-1549
10. Hansson, M. G.; Dillner, J.; Bartram, C. R.; Carlson, J. A.; Helgesson, G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7 (3) 266-9
11. Cambon-Thomsen, A. The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5 (11) 866-873
12. Garcia-Merino, I.; de Las Cuevas, N.; Jimenez, J. L.; Gallego, J.; Gomez, C.; Prieto, C.; Serramia, M. J.; Lorente, R.; Munoz-Fernandez, M. A. The Spanish HIV BioBank: a model of cooperative HIV research Retrovirology 2009, 6, 27
13. Eiseman, E.; Haga, S. B. Handbook of Human Tissue Sources: A National Resource of Human Tissue Samples. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph-reports/ MR954 (accessed Aug 6, 2012).
14. Colditz, G. A.; Manson, J. E.; Hankinson, S. E. The Nurses' Health Study: 20-year contribution to the understanding of health among women J. Women's Health: Off. Publ. Soc. Adv. Women's Health Res. 1997, 6 (1) 49-62
15. Villanueva, J.; Philip, J.; Chaparro, C. A.; Li, Y.; Toledo-Crow, R.; DeNoyer, L.; Fleisher, M.; Robbins, R. J.; Tempst, P. Correcting common errors in identifying cancer-specific serum peptide signatures J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4 (4) 1060-1072
16. Berglund, L.; Bjoerling, E.; Oksvold, P.; Fagerberg, L.; Asplund, A.; Szigyarto, C. A. K.; Persson, A.; Ottosson, J.; Wernerus, H.; Nilsson, P.; Lundberg, E.; Sivertsson, A.; Navani, S.; Wester, K.; Kampf, C.; Hober, S.; Ponten, F.; Uhlen, M.; Genecentric, A Human Protein Atlas for expression profiles based on antibodies Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7 (10) 2019-2027
17. Espina, V.; Mueller, C. Reduction of preanalytical variability in specimen procurement for molecular profiling. In Molecular Profiling; Espina, V.; Liotta, L. A., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, 2012; Vol. 823, pp 49-57.
18. Vaught, J.; Rogers, J.; Myers, K.; Lim, M. D.; Lockhart, N.; Moore, H.; Sawyer, S.; Furman, J. L.; Compton, C. An NCI perspective on creating sustainable biospecimen resources J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2011, 2011 (42) 1-7
19. OECD Best Practice Guidelines for Biological Resource Centers - General Best Practice Guidelines for all BRCs; http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/13/ 38777417.pdf (accessed Aug 2, 2012).
20. Betsou, F.; Lehmann, S.; Ashton, G.; Barnes, M.; Benson, E. E.; Coppola, D.; DeSouza, Y.; Eliason, J.; Glazer, B.; Guadagni, F.; Harding, K.; Horsfall, D. J.; Kleeberger, C.; Nanni, U.; Prasad, A.; Shea, K.; Skubitz, A.; Somiari, S.; Gunter, E.; Biological, I. S. f.; Science, E. R. W. G. o. B. Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: defining the Sample PREanalytical Code Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2010, 19 (4) 1004-1011
21. Riegman, P. H.; Morente, M. M.; Betsou, F.; de Blasio, P.; Geary, P. Biobanking for better healthcare Mol. Oncol. 2008, 2 (3) 213-22
22. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); http://ibb.iarc.fr/ (accessed Aug 6, 2012).
23. European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Biobanking:Human Biological Materials Collection, Storage and Use (POL020); http://www.eortc.org/newsletter-archive/eortc-biobanking-human-biological- materials-collection-storage-and-use-pol020 (accessed Jul 31, 2012).
24. Christine, M. M.; Sharly, J. N.; Gilbert, S. O., Evolution of Translational Omics: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward; The National Academies Press: Washington, D.C., 2012.
25. Ransohoff, D. F.; Gourlay, M. L. Sources of bias in specimens for research about molecular markers for cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28 (4) 698-704
26. Hayden, E. C. Informed consent: a broken contract Nature 2012, 486 (7403) 312-4
27. Longacre, T. A.; Ennis, M.; Quenneville, L. A.; Bane, A. L.; Bleiweiss, I. J.; Carter, B. A.; Catelano, E.; Hendrickson, M. R.; Hibshoosh, H.; Layfield, L. J.; Memeo, L.; Wu, H.; O'Malley F, P. Interobserver agreement and reproducibility in classification of invasive breast carcinoma: an NCI breast cancer family registry study Mod. Pathol. 2006, 19 (2) 195-207
28. Furness, P. A randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of internet-based telepathology compared with conventional microscopy Histopathology 2007, 50 (2) 266-273
29. Molnar, B.; Berczi, L.; Diczhazy, C.; Tagscherer, A.; Varga, S. V.; Szende, B.; Tulassay, Z. Digital slide and virtual microscopy based routine and telepathology evaluation of routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens J. Clin. Pathol. 2003, 56 (6) 433-438
30. Haga, S. B. Impact of limited population diversity of genome-wide association studies Genet. Med. 2010, 12 (2) 81-84
31. Maschke, K. J. Biobanks: DNA and Research; http://www.thehastingscenter. org/uploadedFiles/Publications/Briefing-Book/biobanks%20dna%20and%20research. pdf (accessed Aug 6, 2012).