Transforming government through eparticipation: Challenges for eDemocracy

Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 438-446

  Millard, Peter ^a   Millard, Kate ^a   Adams, Carl ^a   Millan, Stuart Mc ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b McMillan Group Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

Democratic processes; Disenfranchisement; e Petitions; eDemocracy; eParticipation

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRATIC PROCESS; DISENFRANCHISEMENT; E-DEMOCRACY; E-PARTICIPATION; E-PETITIONS;

SURVEYS;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84870864434     PISSN: 20491034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Australian Bureau of Statistics Multipurpose Household Survey, (Australian Bureau of Statistics Publishing). Retrieved January 12, 2012, from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/absat.nsf/mf/8146.0.
2. Barber, B. (2001/2002). Which Technology for Which Democracy? Which Democracy for Which Technology? International Journal of Communications Law and Policy (6).
3. Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J.A. (1998). Governing in the information age. Open University Press: Buckingham.
4. Cameron, D. (2007). Cameron Speech in Full. Retrieved 9/10/2011, 2011, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7026435.stm Dahl, R.A. (2000). On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
5. Dahl, R.A. (2000). On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
6. Diaz, C., Kosta, E., Dekeyser, H., Kohlweiss, M. and G. Nigusse (2008), Privacy preserving electronic petitions, Identity in the Information Society, 1(1).
7. Guibernau, M. (2001). Governing European Diversity. London: Sage Publications.
8. Hutton, W. (2011, Nov 6th). Is capitalism broken... and what is the world going to do to fix it? Retrieved January 14, 2012, from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2011/nov/06/is-capitalism-broken-occupy.
9. Lathrop, D. and Ruma, L. (eds) (2010) Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. Cambridge: O'Reilly.
10. Lindner, R. and U. Riehm (2009), Electronic Petitions and Institutional Modernization: International Parliamentary E-Petition Systems in Comparative Perspective, Journal of eDemocracy and Open Government.
11. Murton, K. Adams, C. and Millard, P. (2010). Is eDemocracy the democracy or an illusion of participation? Paper presented at the mLife Conference on mGovernment.
12. OECD. (2011). OECD Communications Outlook 2011. (OECD Publishing). Retrieved January 12, 2012, from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/comms_outlook-2011-en.
13. Palmieri, S. (2007), Petitions effectiveness: improving citizens' direct access to parliament, presented at the ASPG Conference-Parliament's Accountability to the People, 23-25 August, Adelaide.
14. Peters, B.G. (1986). American public policy: Promise and performance. London: Macmillan.
15. Poster, M. (1995). Postmordern Virtualties. In Featherstone, M. & Burrows, R. Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 79-96). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
16. Reading the Riots: Investigating England's summer of disorder-full report, (2011, Dec 14th) The Guardian and London School of Economics & Political Science. Retrieved March 3rd, 2012, from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2011/dec/14/reading-the-riots-investigating-england-s-summer-ofdisorder-full-report.
17. Silcock, R. (2001). What is EGovernment. Parliamentary Affairs, 54 (1), 88-101.
18. van Dijk, J. (2006). The Network Society (Second Edition). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
19. Chand, K. (2012, March 2nd) Why won't the government debate the 'Drop the health bill' e-petition?, The Guardian. Retrieved March 7th, 2012, from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/mar/02/government-debate-health-bill-epetition.
20. Wraith, R. (1977). Open Government, The British Interpretation. London: Royal Institute of Public Administration.