Phf19 links methylated Lys36 of histone H3 to regulation of Polycomb activity

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1257-1265

  Ballaré, Cecilia ^a,b   Lange, Martin ^a,b   Lapinaite, Audrone ^c   Martin, Gloria Mas ^d   Morey, Lluis ^a,b   Pascual, Gloria ^a,b   Liefke, Robert ^e,f   Simon, Bernd ^c   Shi, Yang ^e,f   Gozani, Or ^d   Carlomagno, Teresa ^c   Benitah, Salvador Aznar ^a,b,g   Di Croce, Luciano ^a,b,g  

^a CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; METHYLTRANSFERASE; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE REPRESSION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; HISTONES; HUMANS; LYSINE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR PROTEINS;

EID: 84870833161     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2434     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Sparmann, A. & van Lohuizen, M. Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 846-856 (2006).
2. Schwartz, Y.B. & Pirrotta, V. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 9-22 (2007).
3. Bracken, A.P., Dietrich, N., Pasini, D., Hansen, K.H. & Helin, K. Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev. 20, 1123-1136 (2006).
4. Boyer, L.A. et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441, 349-353 (2006).
5. O'Carroll, D. et al. The polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4330-4336 (2001).
6. Surface, L.E., Thornton, S.R. & Boyer, L.A. Polycomb group proteins set the stage for early lineage commitment. Cell Stem Cell 7, 288-298 (2010).
7. Sauvageau, M. & Sauvageau, G. Polycomb group proteins: multi-faceted regulators of somatic stem cells and cancer. Cell Stem Cell 7, 299-313 (2010).
8. Schmitges, F.W. et al. Histone methylation by PRC2 is inhibited by active chromatin marks. Mol. Cell 42, 330-341 (2011).
9. Morey, L. et al. Nonoverlapping functions of the Polycomb group Cbx family of proteins in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10, 47-62 (2012).
10. Sing, A. et al. A vertebrate Polycomb response element governs segmentation of the posterior hindbrain. Cell 138, 885-897 (2009).
11. Woo, C.J., Kharchenko, P.V., Daheron, L., Park, P.J. & Kingston, R.E. A region of the human HOXD cluster that confers polycomb-group responsiveness. Cell 140, 99-110 (2010).
12. Mendenhall, E.M. et al. GC-rich sequence elements recruit PRC2 in mammalian ES cells. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001244 (2010).
13. Richly, H. et al. Transcriptional activation of polycomb-repressed genes by ZRF1. Nature 468, 1124-1128 (2010).
14. Landeira, D. et al. Jarid2 is a PRC2 component in embryonic stem cells required for multi-lineage differentiation and recruitment of PRC1 and RNA Polymerase II to developmental regulators. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 618-624 (2010).
15. Pasini, D. et al. JARID2 regulates binding of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 to target genes in ES cells. Nature 464, 306-310 (2010).
16. Peng, J.C. et al. Jarid2/Jumonji coordinates control of PRC2 enzymatic activity and target gene occupancy in pluripotent cells. Cell 139, 1290-1302 (2009).
17. Shen, X. et al. Jumonji modulates polycomb activity and self-renewal versus differentiation of stem cells. Cell 139, 1303-1314 (2009).
18. Nekrasov, M. et al. Pcl-PRC2 is needed to generate high levels of H3-K27 trimethylation at Polycomb target genes. EMBO J. 26, 4078-4088 (2007).
19. Savla, U., Benes, J., Zhang, J. & Jones, R.S. Recruitment of Drosophila Polycomb-group proteins by Polycomblike, a component of a novel protein complex in larvae. Development 135, 813-817 (2008).
20. Casanova, M. et al. Polycomblike 2 facilitates the recruitment of PRC2 Polycomb group complexes to the inactive X chromosome and to target loci in embryonic stem cells. Development 138, 1471-1482 (2011).
21. Walker, E. et al. Polycomb-like 2 associates with PRC2 and regulates transcriptional networks during mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 6, 153-166 (2010).
22. Cao, R. et al. Role of hPHF1 in H3K27 methylation and Hox gene silencing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 1862-1872 (2008).
23. Sarma, K., Margueron, R., Ivanov, A., Pirrotta, V. & Reinberg, D. Ezh2 requires PHF1 to efficiently catalyze H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 2718-2731 (2008).
24. Koh, A.S. et al. Aire employs a histone-binding module to mediate immunological tolerance, linking chromatin regulation with organ-specific autoimmunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15878-15883 (2008).
25. McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K. & Jones, D.T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16, 404-405 (2000).
26. Eissenberg, J.C. Structural biology of the chromodomain: form and function. Gene 496, 69-78 (2012).
27. Bua, D.J. et al. Epigenome microarray platform for proteome-wide dissection of chromatin-signaling networks. PLoS ONE 4, e6789 (2009).
28. Friberg, A., Oddone, A., Klymenko, T., Müller, J. & Sattler, M. Structure of an atypical Tudor domain in the Drosophila Polycomblike protein. Protein Sci. 19, 1906-1916 (2010).
29. Lee, J., Thompson, J.R., Botuyan, M.V. & Mer, G. Distinct binding modes specify the recognition of methylated histones H3K4 and H4K20 by JMJD2A-Tudor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 109-111 (2008).
30. Botuyan, M.V. et al. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127, 1361-1373 (2006).
31. Huang, Y., Fang, J., Bedford, M.T., Zhang, Y. & Xu, R.M. Recognition of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation by the double Tudor domain of JMJD2A. Science 312, 748-751 (2006).
32. Flanagan, J.F. et al. Double chromodomains cooperate to recognize the methylated histone H3 tail. Nature 438, 1181-1185 (2005).
33. Jacobs, S.A. & Khorasanizadeh, S. Structure of HP1 chromodomain bound to a lysine 9-methylated histone H3 tail. Science 295, 2080-2083 (2002).
34. Nielsen, P.R. et al. Structure of the HP1 chromodomain bound to histone H3 methylated at lysine 9. Nature 416, 103-107 (2002).
35. Peña, P.V. et al. Molecular mechanism of histone H3K4me3 recognition by plant homeodomain of ING2. Nature 442, 100-103 (2006).
36. Li, H. et al. Molecular basis for site-specific read-out of histone H3K4me3 by the BPTF PHD finger of NURF. Nature 442, 91-95 (2006).
37. Vezzoli, A. et al. Molecular basis of histone H3K36me3 recognition by the PWWP domain of Brpf1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 617-619 (2010).
38. Margueron, R. et al. Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. Nature 461, 762-767 (2009).
39. Pasini, D., Bracken, A.P., Jensen, M.R., Lazzerini Denchi, E. & Helin, K. Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity. EMBO J. 23, 4061-4071 (2004).
40. Li, G. et al. Jarid2 and PRC2, partners in regulating gene expression. Genes Dev. 24, 368-380 (2010).
41. Yuan, W. et al. H3K36 methylation antagonizes PRC2-mediated H3K27 methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 7983-7989 (2011).
42. Cloos, P.A., Christensen, J., Agger, K. & Helin, K. Erasing the methyl mark: histone demethylases at the center of cellular differentiation and disease. Genes Dev. 22, 1115-1140 (2008).
43. Wagner, E.J. & Carpenter, P.B. Understanding the language of Lys36 methylation at histone H3. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 115-126 (2012).
44. Sun, B. et al. Molecular basis of the interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Eaf3 chromo domain with methylated H3K36. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 36504-36512 (2008).
45. Sánchez, C. et al. Proteomics analysis of Ring1B/Rnf2 interactors identifies a novel complex with the Fbxl10/Jhdm1B histone demethylase and the Bcl6 interacting corepressor. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 820-834 (2007).
46. He, J., Kallin, E.M., Tsukada, Y. & Zhang, Y. The H3K36 demethylase Jhdm1b/Kdm2b regulates cell proliferation and senescence through p15nk4b. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1169-1175 (2008).
47. He, J., Nguyen, A.T. & Zhang, Y. KDM2b/JHDM1b, an H3K36me2-specific demethylase, is required for initiation and maintenance of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 117, 3869-3880 (2011).
48. Liang, G., He, J. & Zhang, Y. Kdm2b promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation by facilitating gene activation early in reprogramming. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 457-466 (2012).
49. Lange, M. et al. Regulation of muscle development by DPF3, a novel histone acetylation and methylation reader of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex. Genes Dev. 22, 2370-2384 (2008).
50. Grzesiek, S. & Bax, A. Improved 3D triple-resonance NMR techniques applied to a 31-kDa protein. J. Magn. Reson. 96, 432-440 (1992).
51. Kay, L.E., Xu, G.Y., Singer, A.U., Muhandiram, D.R. & Formankay, J.D. A gradient-enhanced HCCH-TOCSY experiment for recording side-chain H-1 and C-13 correlations in H2O samples of proteins. J. Magn. Reson. B 101, 333-337 (1993).
52. Schleucher, J., Sattler, M. & Griesinger, C. Coherence selection by gradients without signal attenuation-application to the 3-dimensional HNCO experiment. Angew. Chem. 32, 1489-1491 (1993).
53. Wittekind, M. & Mueller, L. HNCACB, a high-sensitivity 3D NMR experiment to correlate amide proton and nitrogen resonances with the alpha-carbon and beta-carbon resonances in proteins. J. Magn. Reson. B 101, 201-205 (1993).
54. Muhandiram, D.R. & Kay, L.E. Gradient-enhanced triple-resonance 3-dimensional NMR experiments with improved sensitivity. J. Magn. Reson. B 103, 203-216 (1994).
55. Yamazaki, T., Lee, W., Arrowsmith, C.H., Muhandiram, D.R. & Kay, L.E. A suite of triple-resonance NMR experiments for the backbone assignment of N-15, C-13, H-2 labeled proteins with high sensitivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 11655-11666 (1994).
56. Grzesiek, S., Anglister, J. & Bax, A. Correlation of backbone amides and aliphatic side-chain resonances in C-13/N-15-enriched proteins by isotropic mixing of C-13 magnetization. J. Magn. Reson. B 101, 114-119 (1993).
57. Montelione, G.T., Lyons, B.A., Emerson, S.D. & Tashiro, M. An efficient triple resonance experiment using C-13 isotropic mixing for determining sequence-specific resonance assignments of isotopically enriched proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10974-10975 (1992).
58. Yamazaki, T., Forman-Kay, J.D. & Kay, L.E. 2-dimensional NMR experiments for correlating C-13-beta and H-1-delta/epsilon chemical shifts of aromatic residues in C-13-labeled proteins via scalar couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 11054-11055 (1993).
59. Zwahlen, C. et al. Methods for measurement of intermolecular NOEs by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy: Application to a bacteriophage lambda N-peptide/boxB RNA complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 6711-6721 (1997).
60. Wishart, D.S. & Sykes, B.D. The C-13 chemical shift index-a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using C-13 chemical shift data. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 171-180 (1994).
61. Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPIPE-A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277-293 (1995).
62. Johnson, B.A. & Blevins, R.A. NMR VIEW-A computer program for the visualization and analysis of NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 603-614 (1994).
63. Linge, J.P., Habeck, M., Rieping, W. & Nilges, M. ARIA: automated NOE assignment and NMR structure calculation. Bioinformatics 19, 315-316 (2003).
64. Nederveen, A.J. et al. RECOORD: a recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank. Proteins 59, 662-672 (2005).
65. Bernard, A., Vranken, W.F., Bardiaux, B., Nilges, M. & Malliavin, T.E. Bayesian estimation of NMR restraint potential and weight: a validation on a representative set of protein structures. Proteins 79, 1525-1537 (2011).
66. Linge, J.P. & Nilges, M. Influence of non-bonded parameters on the quality of NMR structures: A new force field for NMR structure calculation. J. Biomol. NMR 13, 51-59 (1999).
67. Cornilescu, G., Delaglio, F. & Bax, A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR 13, 289-302 (1999).
68. Linge, J.P., Williams, M.A., Spronk, C., Bonvin, A. & Nilges, M. Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent. Proteins 50, 496-506 (2003).
69. Nozinovic, S., Furtig, B., Jonker, H.R.A., Richter, C. & Schwalbe, H. High-resolution NMR structure of an RNA model system: the 14-mer cUUCGg tetraloop hairpin RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 683-694 (2010).
70. Laskowski, R.A., Macarthur, M.W., Moss, D.S. & Thornton, J.M. PROCHECK-A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283-291 (1993).
71. Vriend, G. WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52-56, 29 (1990).