1 + 1 = 3: Development and validation of a SNP-based algorithm to identify genetic contributions from three distinct inbred mouse strains

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 136-146

  Gorham, James D ^a,b,c   Ranson, Matthew S ^a,c,d   Smith, JaneBeth C ^a,c,d   Gorham, Beverly J ^b,d   Muirhead, Kristen Ashley ^a,c,d  

^a Departments of Microbiology and Immunology   (United States)

^b Departments of Pathology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus   (United States)

^c Cellular   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Congenic; Mice; Microsatellite marker; Multiplex PCR; Polymorphism; Single nucleotide

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED DBA; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MULTIPLEX POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

MUS;

EID: 84870823007     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7171/jbt.12-2304-004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. European Commission, SixthReportontheStatisticsontheNumber of Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
2. Hedrich H. The Laboratory Mouse, Bullock G, Petrusz P (eds). San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier, 2004.
3. Schauwecker PE. The relevance of individual genetic back-ground and its role in animal models of epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2011; 97: 1-11.
4. Doetschman T. Influence of genetic background on genetically engineered mouse phenotypes. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 530: 423-433.
5. Eisener-Dorman AF, Lawrence DA, Bolivar VJ. Cautionary insights on knockout mouse studies: the gene or not the gene? Brain Behav Immun 2009; 23: 318-324.
6. Vijayaraj P, Sohl G, Magin TM. Keratin transgenic and knock-out mice: functional analysis and validation of disease-causing mutations. Methods Mol Biol 2007; 360: 203-251.
7. Yoshiki A, Moriwaki K. Mouse phenome research: implications of genetic background. ILAR J 2006; 47: 94-102.
8. Barthold SW. Genetically altered mice: phenotypes, no pheno-types, and Faux phenotypes. Genetica 2004; 122: 75-88.
9. Taft RA, Davisson M, Wiles MV. Know thy mouse. Trends Genet 2006; 22: 649-653.
10. Trask H, Tomlinson C, Fiering S, Gorham JD. Introducing DartMouse: the Mouse Speed Congenic Facility at Dartmouth Medical School. J Biomol Tech 2010; 21(Suppl 3): S70.
11. Cornall RJ, Aitman TJ, Hearne CM, Todd JA. The generation of a library of PCR-analyzed microsatellite variants for genetic mapping of the mouse genome. Genomics 1991; 10: 874-881.
12. Dietrich WF, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Miller JC, Jenkins NA, Lander ES. Mapping the mouse genome: currentstatusand future prospects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 10849-10853.
13. Dietrich W, Katz H, Lincoln SE, et al. A genetic map of the mouse suitable for typing intraspecific crosses. Genetics 1992; 131: 423-447.
14. Love JM, Knight AM, McAleer MA, Todd JA. Towards con-struction of a high resolution map of the mouse genome using PCR-analysed microsatellites. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18: 4123-4130.
15. Hearne CM, McAleer MA, Love JM, et al. Additional microsat-ellite markers for mouse genome mapping. Mamm Genome 1991; 1: 273-282.
16. Markel P, Shu P, Ebeling C, et al. Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains. Nat Genet 1997; 17: 280-284.
17. Tsang S, Sun Z, Luke B, et al. A comprehensive SNP-based genetic analysis of inbred mouse strains. Mamm Genome 2005; 16: 476-480.
18. Kofler R, Duchosal MA, Johnson ME, et al. The genetic origin of murine lupus-associated autoantibodies. Immunol Lett 1987; 16: 265-271.
19. Permutt MA. Use of DNA polymorphisms for genetic analysis of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Baillieres Clin En-docrinol Metab 1991; 5: 495-526.
20. Lawrie NM, Tease C, Hulten MA. Chiasma frequency, distri-bution and interference maps of mouse autosomes. Chromosoma 1995; 104: 308-314.
21. Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP. Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr Genomics 2010; 11: 91-102.