Risk identification on hydropower project using the IAHP and extension of TOPSIS methods under interval-valued fuzzy environment

Natural Hazards

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 359-373

  Zhang, Sherong ^a   Sun, Bo ^a   Yan, Lei ^b,c   Wang, Chao ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c HydroChina Kunming Engineering Corporation   (China)

Author keywords

Extension of TOPSIS with interval data; Hydropower project; IAHP; Interval valued fuzzy environment; Multi criteria decision making; Risk identification

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; EARTH DAM; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 84870790050     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0367-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albayrak E, Erensal YC (2004) Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: an application of multiple criteria decision making problem. J Intell Manuf 15(4): 491-503.
2. ANCOLD (Australian National Committee on Large Dams). Guidelines on Risk Assessment, 2003.
3. Badri MA (2001) A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems. Int J Prod Econ 72(1): 27-40.
4. Brandsater A (2002) Risk assessment in the offshore industry. Saf Sci 40(1-4): 231-269.
5. Buckley J, Feuring T, Hayashi Y (2001) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited. Eur J Oper Res 129(1): 48-64.
6. Chen S (1996) Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 77(3): 265-276.
7. Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1): 1-9.
8. Daǧdeviren M, Yüksel İ (2008) Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Inf Sci 178(6): 1717-1733.
9. Daǧdeviren M, Yavuz S, Ki{dotless}li{dotless}nç N (2009) Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 36(4): 8143-8151.
10. Duijne FHV, Aken DV, Schouten EG (2008) Consideration in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment. Saf Sci 46(2): 245-254.
11. Ertugrul Ī, Karakasoglu N (2009) Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 36(1): 702-715.
12. Flanagan R, Norman G (1993) Risk management and construction. Blackwell Science Pty. Ltd., Victoria.
13. Hillson D (2002) Use a risk breakdown structure to understand your risks. Project Management Institute Annual Seminars, Texas.
14. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, A state of the art survey. Springer-Verlag, New York.
15. ICOLD Bulletin (2003) Risk assessment in dam safety management.
16. Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Davoodi AR (2009) Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: interval efficiency. Math Comput Model 49(5-6): 1137-1142.
17. Jin Y (2008) Study on the analysis approach for the dangerous situations of dam breach. Hohai University, Nanjing.
18. Kahraman C, Ruan D, Doǧan I (2003) Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Inf Sci 157: 135-153.
19. Kreuzer H (2000) The use of risk analysis to support dam safety decisions and management. ICOLD 20th Congress, Beijing.
20. Kular O, Kahraman C (2005) Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Inf Sci 170(2-4): 191-210.
21. Li L (2009) Risk management of large dams and emergency plan: modern dam safety concept. China Water Resour 22: 63-66.
22. Li S (2011) Key technology research and system development of dam safety risk management. Tianjin University, Tianjin.
23. Li L, Wang R, Sheng J et al (2006) Risk assessment and risk management of large dam. WaterPower Press, Beijing.
24. Lipovetsky S, Tishler A (1999) Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP. Eur J Oper Res 114(1): 153-164.
25. Lou J (2000) Dam safety risk management of BC Hydro Company in Canada. Large dam saf 4: 7-11.
26. Ma F (2006) Risk analysis and early-warning methods for reservoir dams. Hohai University, Nanjing.
27. Mikhailov L (2002) Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega 30(5): 393-401.
28. Mojtahedi SMH, Mousavi SM, Makui A (2010) Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously using multi-attribute group decision making technique. Saf Sci 48(4): 499-507.
29. PMI (Project Management Institute), 2004. A guide to the project management body of knowledge, PMBOK Guide, 3rd ed. Project Management Institute Inc, USA. Chapter 11 on project risk management.
30. Saaty T (1980) Analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, NewYork.
31. Smith NJ, Merna T, Jobling P (2006) Managing risk in construction projects. Blackwell, Oxford.
32. Standards Association of Australia, AS/NZS 4360 (2004) Standard for risk management.
33. Sun Y (2010) Study on characteristic of dam disaster complex adaptive system and model for dam break threshold value. Tianjin University, Tianjin.
34. Yan L (2011) Study on operation safety risk analysis method of dam. Tianjin University, Tianjin.
35. Zhu J (2005) Research on some problems of the analytic hierarchy process and its application. Northeastern University, Shenyang.
36. Zhu J, Liu S, Wang M (2005) Novel weight approach for interval numbers comparison matrix in the analytic hierarchy Process. Syst Eng-Theor Pract 4: 29-34.
37. Zou PXW, Zhang G, Wang J (2007) Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. Int J Proj Manag 25(6): 601-614.