An empirical study of the smart grid Technology Acceptance Model in Korea

2012 IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition, ENERGYCON 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 836-841

  Park, Chan Kook ^a   Kim, Hyun Jae ^a   Kim, Yang Soo ^a  

^a Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

smart grid; smart grid consumer; smart grid test bed; TAM; technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

CYBER SECURITY; EASE-OF-USE; ECONOMIC BENEFITS; ELECTRICAL POWER; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; MODEL-BASED OPC; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; RESEARCH MODELS; SMART GRID; TAM; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; EXHIBITIONS; SMART POWER GRIDS;

ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS;

EID: 84870784196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EnergyCon.2012.6348268     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Accenture, Revealing the Values of the New Energy Consumer: Accenture end-consumer observatory on electricity management, Accenture, Dublin, 2011.
2. J.C. Anderson, and D.W. Gerbing, "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach," Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp. 411-423, 1988.
3. R.P. Bagozzi, And Y. Yi, "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1), pp. 74-94, 1988.
4. L.D. Chen, M.L. Gillenson, and D.L. Sherrell, "Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective," Information & Management, 39(8), pp. 705-719, 2002.
5. F.D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319-340, 1989.
6. EcoAlign, Separating Smart Grid from Smart Meters? Consumer Perceptions and Expectations of Smart Grid, EcoAlign, Boston, 2010.
7. C. Fornell, and D.F. Larker, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Management Science, 40(4), pp. 440-465, 1981.
8. D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, and M.C. Voudreau, "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), pp. 1-70, 2000.
9. GlobalData, Smart Grid Roll-out: Steps to Overcome Utility and Consumer Barriers, GlobalData, Los Angeles, 2010.
10. Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tahtam, and W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Fifth ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998.
11. Harris Interactive, Consumers Have Little Awareness of Smart Grid and Smart Meters, Harris Interactive, New York, 2010.
12. IBM, 2011 Global Utility Consumer Survey, IBM, New York, 2011.
13. IEA, Smart Grid-Smart Customer Policy Needs, IEA, Vienna, 2011.
14. James, L.R., A. Mulaik, and J.M. Brett, Causal Analysis: Assumptions Models and Data, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1982.
15. Jöreskog, K.G. and D. Sörbom, LISREL-VI User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software, Chicago, IL, 1984.
16. E. Karahanna, D.W. Straub, and N.L. Chervany, "Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison," MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 1999.
17. Kim, H.J. and K.S. Kim, A Survey on Consumer Response and Attitude in Jeju Smart Grid Test-bed, Korea Energy Economics Institute, Uiwang, 2010.11.
18. Kim, H.J. and C.K. Park, Government's Role for Promoting Competition and Mediating Interests among Smart Grid Market Participants, MKE, Gwacheon, 2011.
19. S. Okazaki, "What Do We Know about Mobile Internet Adopters? A Cluster Analysis," Information & Management, 43(2), pp. 127-141, 2006.
20. C.S. Ong, J.Y. Lai, and Y.S. Wang, "Factors Affecting Engineers' Acceptance of Asynchronous e-Learning Systems in High-tech Companies," Information & Management, 41(6), pp. 795-804, 2004.
21. Oracle, Turning Information Into Power Report: Moving Toward the Smart Grid, Oracle, California, 2009.
22. S. Park, S. Kang, and Y. Kim, "A Channel Recommendation System in Mobile Environment," IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 52(1), pp. 33-39, 2006.
23. SGCC, Consumer Voice: Results of Baseline Focus Groups, SGCC, Atlanta, 2010.
24. V. Venkatesh and F.D. Davis, "A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test," Decision Sciences, 27(3), pp. 451-481, 1996.
25. V. Venkatesh and F.D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186-204, 2000.
26. Zpryme, The New Energy Consumer, Zpryme, Mountain City, 2011.