Assessing the quality of qualitative research

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-3

  Salmon, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLING; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84870780396     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.018     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Britten N. Qualitative research on health communication: what can it contribute?. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 82:384-388.
2. Finset A. Qualitative methods in communication and patient education research. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:1-2.
3. Hsu I., Saha S., Korthuis P.T., Sharp V., Cohn J., Moore R.D., Beach M.C. Providing support to patients in emotional encounters: a new perspective on missed empathic opportunities. Patient Educ Counsel 2012, 88:436-442.
4. Tiitinen S., Ruusuvuori J. Engaging parents through gaze: speaker selection in three-party interactions in maternity clinics. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 89:38-43.
5. Brien S.B., Leydon G.M., Lewith G. Homeopathy enables rheumatoid arthritis patients to cope with their chronic ill health: a qualitative study of patient's perceptions of the homeopathic consultation. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 89:507-516.
6. Thorne S., Oliffe J.L., Stajduhar KI Communicating shared decision-making: cancer patient perspectives. Patient Educ Couns 2012, E-pub ahead of print. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.018.
7. Evans M., Sharp D., Shaw A. Developing a model of decision-making about complementary therapy use for patients with cancer: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 89:374-380.
8. van Vliet L., Francke A., Tomson S., Plum N., van der Wall E., Bensing J When cure is no option: how explicit and hopeful can information be given? A qualitative study in breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2012, E-pub ahead of print. 10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.021.
9. Salmon P. How do we recognise good research?. Psychologist 2003, 16:24-27.
10. Barbour R.S. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. Brit Med J 2001, 322:1115-1117.
11. Chamberlain K. Methodolatry and qualitative health research. J Health Psychol 2000, 5:285-294.
12. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet 2001, 358:483-488.
13. Neumann M., Kreps G., Visser A. Methodological pluralism in health communication research. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 82:281-284.
14. Kreps G.L. Methodological diversity and integration in health communication inquiry. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 82:285-291.
15. Orwell G Politics and the English language April 1946, Horizon.