Reference buildings for cost optimal analysis: Method of definition and application

Applied Energy

Volumn 102, Issue , 2013, Pages 983-993

  Corgnati, Stefano Paolo ^a   Fabrizio, Enrico ^b   Filippi, Marco ^a   Monetti, Valentina ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cost optimal analysis; Energy performance; Nearly zero energy building; Office building; Reference buildings

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; OFFICE BUILDINGS; OPTIMIZATION;

BUILDING STOCKS; DYNAMIC ENERGY; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; ENERGYPLUS; GENERAL METHODOLOGIES; MINIMUM ENERGY; OPTIMAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMAL LEVEL; REGIONAL LEVELS; ZERO ENERGY BUILDING (ZEB);

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

BUILDING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENERGY PLANNING; NUMERICAL MODEL; OFFICE LOCATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS;

ITALY;

EID: 84870755289     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. EPBD recast. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European parliament and of council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). official journal of the European union; 2010.
2. Guidelines accompanying on supplementing directive 2010/31/EC of the European parliament and of the council on the EPBD (recast) by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements.
3. Loga T, Diefenbach N, editors. Use of building typologies for energy performance assessment of national building stocks. Existent experiences in European countries and common approach. First TABULA synthesis report. Darmstadt; Institut Wohnen und Umwel; 2010. ISBN: 978-3-941140-14-1. http://www.building-typology.eu.
4. Spiekman M, editor. Comparison of energy performance requirements levels: possibilities and impossibilities. Summary report. Report of ASIEPI; March 31, 2010. http://www.asiepi.eu.
5. Tommerup H., Svendsen S. Energy savings in danish residential building stock. Energy Build 2006, 38(6):618-626.
6. Gaglia A.G., Balaras C.A., Mirasgedis S., Georgopoulou E., Sarafidis Y., Lalas D.P. Empirical assessment of the hellenic non-residential building stock. Energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings. Energy Convers Manage 2007, 48(4):1160-1175.
7. Desideri U., Leonardi D., Arcioni L., Sdringola P. European project Educa-RUE: an example of energy efficiency paths in educational buildings. Appl Energy 2012, 3-5. [ISSN 0306-2619]. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.00.
8. Olofsson Thomas, Mahlia T.M.I. Modeling and simulation of the energy use in an occupied residential building in cold climate. Appl Energy 2012, 91(1):432-438.
9. Attia S., Evrard A., Gratia E. Development of benchmark models for the Egyptian residential buildings sector. Appl Energy 2012, 94(6):270-284.
10. Wan K.S.Y., Yik F.W.H. Building design and energy end-use characteristics of high-rise residential buildings in Hong Kong. Appl Energy 2004, 78(1):19-36.
11. Hernandez P., Burke K., Lewis J.O. Development of energy performance benchmarks and building energy ratings for non-domestic buildings: an example for Irish primary schools. Energy Build 2008, 40(3):249-254.
12. Gustavsson L., Joelsson A. Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential building. Energy Build 2010, 42(2):210-220.
13. Verbeeck G., Hens H. Life cycle inventory of buildings: a calculation method. Energy Build 2010, 45(4):1037-1041.
14. CEN [European Committee for Standardization]. Energy performance of buildings - Economic evaluation procedure for energy systems in buildings. Standard EN 15459:2007, Brussels: CEN; 2007.
15. Becchio C, Guglielmino D, Fabrizio E, Filippi M. Whole cost analysis of building envelope technologies according to the European Standard EN 15459. In: Proc of climamed '11 VI congreso mediterraneo de climatizacion, ATECYR, Madrid; 2-3 June 2011. pp. 291-306. [ISBN 978-84-95010-41-4].
16. Jurnitski J. How to calculate cost optimal nZEB energy performance?. REHVA Eur HVAC J 2011, 48(5):36-41.
17. Draft Working Document on supplementing Directive 2010/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the EPBD (recast) by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements.
18. Atanasiu B, Boermans T, Hermelink A, Schimschar S, Grözinger J, Offermann M, et al. Principles for nearly zero energy buildings. Paving the way for effective implementation of policy requirements. Brussels: Building Perfomance Institute Europe (BPIE); 2011 [ISBN: 9789491143021].
19. Economidou M, Atanasiu B, Despret C, Economidou M, Maio J, Nolte I, Rapf O, et al. Europe's building under the microscope. A country by country review of the energy perfomance of buildings. Brussels: Building Perfomance Institute Europe (BPIE); 2011 [ISBN: 9789491143014].
20. Deru M, Griffith B, Torcellini P. DOE commercial building benchmark models. In: Proceedings, ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, Pacific Grove, CA. Golden, CO: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; August, 2008.
21. Ballarini I, Corgnati SP, Corrado V, Talà N. Building typology brochure - Italy [Fascicolo sulla tipologia edilizia italiana]. Italian TABULA, report; october 2011. http://www.building-typology.eu.
22. ECBS. Stock aggregation, in "Annex 31-Energy related environmental impact of buildings", IEA-ECBCS (International Energy Agency-Energy Conservation in Buildgins and Community Systems); 2004.
23. Deru M, Field K, Studer D, Benne K, Griffith B, Torcellini P, et al. Department of energy commercial reference building models of the national building stock. Technical, report NREL/TP-5500-46861; 2011.
24. Spiekman M, Westerlaken N. Reference buildings for EP calculation studies. Report of ASIEPI WP2; 2009. http://www.asiepi.eu.
25. Kurnitski J., Saari A., Kalamees T., Vuolle M., Niemela J., Tark T. Cost optimal and nearly zero (nZEB) energy performance calculations for residential buildings with REHVA definition for nZEB national implementation. Energy Build 2011, 43(11):3279-3288.
26. Citterio M. Analisi statistica sul parco edilizio non residenziale e sviluppo di modelli di calcolo semplificati [Statistical analysis on the non residential building stock and development of simplified calculation tools] report RSE/2009/161, ENEA, Cresme Ricerche Spa e Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; 2009 [in Italian].
27. Dolmans D. Change is going to come. A new mandate: nearly zero energy buildings. Eur HVAC Rehva J 2011, 48(6):34-37.
28. BPIE [Building Perfomance Institute Europe]. Cost optimality. Discussing methodology and challenges within the recast energy perfomance of buildings directive. Report; 2010.
29. Fabrizio E, Guglielmino D, Monetti V. Italian benchmark building models: the office building. In: Soebarto V, Bennetts H, Bannister P, Thomas PC, Leach D, editors. Driving better design through simulation, IBPSA Australia & AIRAH, Melbourne; 2011. p. 1981-88. [ISBN 978-0-646-56510-1].
30. Decreto Legislativo n. 311 del 29 Dicembre 2006, Disposizioni correttive ed integrative al decreto legislativo 19 agosto 2005, n. 192, recante attuazione della direttiva 2002/91/CE, relativa al rendimento energetico nell'edilizia.
31. Decreto del presidente della repubblica 2 aprile 2009, n. 59, Regolamento di attuazione dell'articolo 4, comma 1, lettere a) e b), del decreto legislativo 19 agosto 2005, n. 192, concernente attuazione della direttiva 2002/91/CE sul rendimento energetico in edilizia.
32. UNI, Impianti aeraulici a fini di benessere. Generalità, classificazione e requisiti. Regole per la richiesta d'offerta, l'offerta, l'ordine e la fornitura, Norma UNI 10339; 1995.
33. CEN [European Committee for Standardization]. Energy performance of buildings. Impact of building automation, controls and building management. Standard EN 15232:2007, Brussels: CEN; 2007.